X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly

Yi Liang; Long-Bin Chen; Cong-Feng Qiao

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063105

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(6) : 063105 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063105

X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly

Yi Liang ^1,, ,
Long-Bin Chen ^1,2,, ,
Cong-Feng Qiao ^1,2,,

1.
School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road 19A, Beijing 100049, China
2.
School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road 19A, Beijing 100049, China
3.
CAS Center for Excellence in Particle Physics, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
A recent experimental study of excited ⁸Be decay to its ground state revealed an anomaly in the angular distribution of the final states. This exceptional result is attributed to a new vector gauge boson X(16.7). We study the significance of this new boson, especially its effect in anomalies observed in long-lasting experimental measurements. By comparing the discrepancies between the Standard Model predictions and the experimental results, we find the values and regions of the couplings of X(16.7) to the muon and muon neutrino. In this work, we find that the newly observed boson X(16.7) may be the solution of both the NuTeV anomaly and the (g-2)_μ puzzle.
- NuTeV anomaly ,
- new gauge boson ,
- (g-2) anomaly ,
- neutrino trident production.

References

[1]	A. J. Krasznahorkay et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116: 042501 (2016)
[2]	J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117: 071803 (2016)
[3]	P. H. Gu and X. G. He, arXiv:1606.05171
[4]	L. B. Chen, Y. Liang, and C. F. Qiao, arXiv:1607.03970
[5]	J. P. Zeller, K. S. McFarland, T. Adams et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88: 091802 (2002)
[6]	F. Reines, H. S. Gurr, and H. W. Sobel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 37: 315-318 (1976)
[7]	P. Vilain et al, Phys. Lett. B, 302: 351 (1993)
[8]	P. Vilain et al, Phys. Lett. B, 335: 246 (1994)
[9]	R. Casalbuoni, S. D. Curtis, D. Dominici et al, Z'indication from new APV data in Cesium and searches at linear colliders, 5th Workshop of the 2nd ECFA-DESY Study on Physics and Detectors for a Linear Electron-Positron Collider Obernai, (1999) 480-489, arXiv:hepph/0001215
[10]	G. W. Bennett et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92: 161802 (2004)
[11]	W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113: 091801 (2014)
[12]	S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and V. A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. D, 91: 095015 (2015)
[13]	S. Davidson, S. Forte, P. Gambino, N.Rius, and A. Strumia, JHEP, 02: 37 (2002)
[14]	K. S. McFarland and S. Moch, Conventional physics explanations for the NuTeV sin**2theta(W), in Proceedings of the Electroweak precision data and the Higgs mass Workshop (Zeuthen, Germany, February 28-March 1, 2003), p.61-83, arXiv:hepph/0306052
[15]	S. Kretzer, F. Olness, J. Pumplin et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93: 041802 (2004)
[16]	F. Olness, J. Pumplin, D. Stump et al, Eur. Phys. J. C, 40: 145 (2005)
[17]	J. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon et al, arXiv:1608.03591
[18]	H. Davoudiasl, H. S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 095006 (2014)
[19]	E. M. Riordan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59: 755 (1987)
[20]	J. D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D, 80: 075018 (2009)
[21]	M. Deniz et al, Phys. Rev. D, 81: 072001 (2010)
[22]	D. Abbaneo et al, A Combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model, in Proceedings of the SLD Heavy Flavor and Electroweak Groups (DELPHI, ALEPH, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, L3, 2003), p.61-83, arXiv:hepex/0112021
[23]	C. Boehm, Phys. Rev. D, 70: 055007 (2004)
[24]	K. A. Olive et al, Chin. Phys. C, 38: 090001 (2014)
[25]	W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 095033 (2014)
[26]	C. F. von Weizsacker, Z. Phys., 88: 612 (1934)
[27]	E. J. Williams, Phys. Rev., 45: 729 (1934)
[28]	V. Shtabovenko, FeynCalc 9, 17th International workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in physics research (Valparaiso, Chile, January, 2016), p.18-22, arXiv:1604.06709
[29]	R. Belusevic and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D, 37: 2419 (1988)
[30]	T. Hahn, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 559: 273 (2006)
[31]	J. Lovseth and M. Radomiski, Phys. Rev. D, 3: 2686 (1971)
[32]	R. W. Brown, R. H. Hobbs, J. Smith, and N. Stanko, Phys. Rev. D, 6: 3273 (1972)
[33]	D. Geiregat et al, Phys. Lett. D, 245: 271 (1990)
[34]	S. R. Mishra et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66: 3117 (1991)
[35]	T. Adams et al, Phys. Rev. D, 61: 092001 (2000)
[36]	M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D, 80: 095002 (2009)
[37]	R. Gauld, F. Goertz, and U. Haisch, Phys. Rev. D, 89: 015005 (2014)
[38]	A. J. Buras and J. Girrbach, JHEP, 12: 009 (2013)
[39]	R. Gauld, F. Goertz, and U. Haisch, JHEP, 01: 069 (2014)
[40]	A. J. Buras, F. D. Fazio, and J. Girrbach, JHEP, 02: 112 (2014)
[41]	S. Bilmis, I. Turan, T. M. Aliev et al, Phys. Rev. D, 92: 033009 (2015)

[1]	Jiajun Wu , Da Huang , Chao-Qiang Geng . W-boson mass anomaly from a general SU(2)_L scalar multiplet. Chinese Physics C, 2023, 47(6): 063103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acc8bf
[2]	Nilanjana Kumar , Takaaki Nomura , Hiroshi Okada . A multi-charged particle model with local U(1)_μ-τ to explain muon g–2, flavor physics, and possible collider signature. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(4): 043106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac425a
[3]	António P. Morais , Roman Pasechnik , J. Pedro Rodrigues . What can a heavy ${{U(1)}_{\bf B-L} \; {Z^\prime}}$ boson do to the muon ${{(g-2)}_{\mu}}$ anomaly and to a new Higgs boson mass?. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(1): 013103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abc16a
[4]	Ishtiaq Ahmed , Abdur Rehman . LHCb anomaly in B→K^*μ⁺μ^- optimised observables and potential of Z' model. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(6): 063103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/063103
[5]	Wen Yin . Fixed point and anomaly mediation in partial N=2 supersymmetric standard models. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(1): 013104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/1/013104
[6]	Hong-Lei Li , Peng-Cheng Lu , Zong-Guo Si , Ying Wang . Associated production of Higgs boson and tt at LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(6): 063102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/6/063102
[7]	ZHAO Dong , LI Ming-Hua , WANG Ping , CHANG Zhe . Inflation in de Sitter spacetime and CMB large scale anomaly. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(9): 095101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/9/095101
[8]	W. J. Marciano , A. Sirlin . Muon g－2 discrepancy: new physics or a relatively light Higgs?. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 735-740. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/020
[9]	Michel Davier . New results on the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g－2. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 718-727. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/018
[10]	Gabriel López Castro . Recent progress on isospin breaking corrections and their impact on the muon g－2 value. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 712-717. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/017
[11]	Tsutomu Mibe , for the , PARC g . New g－2 experiment at J-PARC. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 745-748. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/022
[12]	Daisuke Nomura . Update of g－2 of the muon and Δα. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 728-734. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/019
[13]	Lee Roberts , on behalf , of the , New Muon . Status of the Fermilab muon (g－2) experiment. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 741-744. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/021
[14]	Abdolmajid Izadpanah . Causality principle and nuclear dispersion anomaly in the elastic scattering for α+¹²C system. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(12): 1842-1845.
[15]	LIU Wei , YUE Chong-Xing , SU Xue-Song , WANG Yong-Zhi . LHT model and Higgs boson production in association with a weak gauge boson at the LHC. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(10): 1565-1569. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/003
[16]	D. Werthmüller (for the Crystal Ball/TAPS collaborations) . Investigation of the anomaly in η-photoproduction off the neutron. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1345-1348. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/051
[17]	WANG Xue-Lei , JIN Zhen-Lan , ZENG Qing-Guo . Production of the new gauge boson B_H via e^－ collision in the littlest Higgs model. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(3): 165-171. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/3/001
[18]	Jing Sicong , Ruan Jie . Bjorken-Johnson-Low Technique and a Perturbative Study on Chiral Anomaly in Pure Abelian Coset Gauge Field Theory. Chinese Physics C, 1991, 15(S2): 141-152.
[19]	Dong Shaojing . The Feynman Rules and Axial Vector Current Anomaly on the Normal Fuzzy Lattice. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(S1): 23-32.
[20]	Chen Wei . Alternative Regularization Scheme and Conformal Anomaly Strings. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(S4): 379-386.

Access

Get Citation

Yi Liang, Long-Bin Chen and Cong-Feng Qiao. X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 063105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063105

Yi Liang, Long-Bin Chen and Cong-Feng Qiao. X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 063105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063105 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2016-12-15
Revised: 2017-02-17

Fund

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2015CB856703), by by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB23030000), and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the grant 11375200}

Article Metric

Article Views(1467)
PDF Downloads(22)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

X(16.7) as the solution of the NuTeV anomaly

Corresponding author: Yi Liang,

Corresponding author: Long-Bin Chen,

Corresponding author: Cong-Feng Qiao,

HTML

目录