×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系,借此进行欺诈等不法行为,请广大作者加以鉴别,如遇诈骗行为,请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认(《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部电话:010-88235947,010-88236950),并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明:
(1)本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
(2)本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径,该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统,仅在本刊投稿网网址(https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc)设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿,如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等,若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
(3)所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表,本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿,并收取发表费用,均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部
2024年10月30日

Empirical formulas for proton decay half-lives: Role of nuclear deformation and Q-value

  • Two empirical formulas for the proton decay half-lives including nuclear deformation are proposed. The formula with parameter set I gives the logarithm of the proton decay half-lives as an explicit function of the orbital angular momentum with eight adjustable parameters, whereas that with set Ⅱ represents the logarithm of the reduced half-lives as an implicit function of the angular momentum with seven adjustable parameters. Experimental data for the half-lives of 44 proton emitters in the ground state or isomeric state were used to obtain the parameters. The experimental and calculated Q values were used. Different sets of parameters were obtained for the ground state transition, isomeric state transition, and all transitions for both deformed and spherical nuclei. The best agreement with experimental data was observed for set I for deformed proton emitters with experimental Q values.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中
  • [1] H. Geiger and J. M. Nuttall, Philos. Mag., 22:613 (1911); H. Geiger, Z. Phys., 8:45 (1922)
    [2] D.N. Poenaru, M. Ivascu, A. Sandulescu, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C, 32:572 (1985); D. N. Poenaru, D. Schnabel, W. Greiner, D. Mazilu, and R. Gherghescu, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 48:231 (1991)
    [3] Y. J. Shi and W. J. Swiatecki, Phys. Rev. Lett., 54:300 (1985)
    [4] D. S. Delion, A. Insolia, and R. J. Liotta, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:4549 (1997)
    [5] H. F. Zhang and G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C, 77:054318 (2008)
    [6] A. Bhagwat and Y. K. Gambhir, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 35:065109 (2008)
    [7] D. Ni and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 80:014314 (2009)
    [8] V. Yu. Denisov, O. I. Davidovskaya, and I. Yu. Sedykh, Phys. Rev. C, 92:014602 (2015)
    [9] S. Dahmardeh, S. A. Alavi, and V. Dehghani, Nucl. Phys. A, 963:68 (2017)
    [10] S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Cui, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. C, 95:014311 (2017)
    [11] Y. L. Zhang and Y. Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. C, 97:014318 (2018)
    [12] K. P. Jackson, C. U. Cardinal, H. C. Evans, N. A. Jelley, and J. Cerny, Phys. Lett. B, 33:281 (1970)
    [13] O. Klepper, T. Batsch, S. Hofmann, R. Kirchner, W. Kurcewicz, W. Reisdorf, E. Roeckl, D. Schardt, and G. Nyman, Z. Phys. A:At. Nucl., 305:125 (1982)
    [14] R. D. Page, P. J. Woods, R. A. Cunningham, T. Davinson, N. J. Davis, A. N. James, K. Livingston, P. J. Sellin, and A. C. Shotter, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:1798 (1994)
    [15] C. N. Davids et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:592 (1996)
    [16] K. P. Rykaczewski, Eur. Phys. J. A, 15:81 (2002)
    [17] C. N. Davids et al, Phys. Rev. C, 83:064320 (2011)
    [18] D. T. Joss et al, Phys. Lett. B, 641:34 (2006)
    [19] B. Blank and M. J. G. Borge, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 60:403 (2008)
    [20] M. Pfutzner, M. Karny, L. V. Grigorenko, and K. Riisager, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84:567 (2012)
    [21] P. J. Woods and C. N. Davids, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 47:541 (1997)
    [22] S. Aberg, P. B. Semmes, and W. Nazarewicz, Phys. Rev. C, 56:1762 (1997)
    [23] D. N. Basu, P. R. Chowdhury, and C. Samanta, Phys. Rev. C, 72:051601(R) (2005)
    [24] M. Balasubramaniam and N. Arunachalam, Phys. Rev. C, 71:014603 (2005)
    [25] D. S. Delion, R. J. Liotta, and R. Wyss, Phys. Rep., 424:113 (2006)
    [26] D. S. Delion, R. J. Liotta, and R. Wyss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:072501 (2006)
    [27] E. L. Medeiros, M. M. N. Rodrigues, S. B. Duarte, and O. A. P. Tavares, Eur. Phys. J. A, 34:417 (2007)
    [28] M. Bhattacharya and G. Gangopadhyay, Phys. Lett. B, 651:263 (2007)
    [29] J. M. Yao, B. Sun, P. J. Woods, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C, 77:024315 (2008)
    [30] J. M. Dong, H. F. Zhang, and G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C, 79:054330 (2009)
    [31] Y. Qian, Z. Ren, and D. Ni, Chin. Phys. Lett., 27:072301 (2010)
    [32] Y. B. Qian, Z. Z. Ren, D. D. Ni, and Z. Q. Sheng, Chin. Phys. Lett., 27:112301 (2010)
    [33] H. F. Zhang, Y. J. Wang, J. M. Dong, J. Q. Li, and W. Scheid, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 37:085107 (2010)
    [34] L. S. Ferreira, E. Maglione, and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B, 701:508 (2011)
    [35] T. R. Routray, S. K. Tripathy, B. B. Dash, B. Behera, and D. N. Basu, Eur. Phys. J. A, 47:92 (2011)
    [36] B. Sahu, S. K. Agarwalla, and S. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C, 84:054604 (2011)
    [37] C. Qi, D. S. Delion, R. J. Liotta, and R. Wyss, Phys. Rev. C, 85:011303(R) (2012)
    [38] Q. Zhao, J. M. Dong, J. L. Song, and W. H. Long, Phys. Rev. C, 90:054326 (2014)
    [39] Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Eur. Phys. J. A, 52:68 (2016)
    [40] A. Zdeb, M. Warda, C. M. Petrache, and K. Pomorski, Eur. Phys. J. A, 52:323 (2016)
    [41] K. P. Santhosh and I. Sukumaran, Phys. Rev. C, 96:034619 (2017)
    [42] S. Modi, M. Patial, P. Arumugam, E. Maglione, and L. S. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. C, 95:054323 (2017)
    [43] Y. Z. Wang, J. P. Cui, Y. L. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J. Z. Gu, Phys. Rev. C, 95:014302 (2017)
    [44] D. S. Delion, Phys. Rev. C, 80:024310 (2009)
    [45] D. Ni, Z. Ren, Rom. Journ. Phys., 57:407 (2012)
    [46] Z. X. Zhang and J. M. Dong, Chin. Phys. C, 42:1 (2018)
    [47] C. Qi, F. R. Xu, R. J. Liotta, and R. Wyss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:072501 (2009)
    [48] C. Qi, F. R. Xu, R. J. Liotta, R. Wyss, M. Y. Zhang, C. Asawatangtrakuldee, and D. Hu, Phys. Rev. C, 80:044326 (2009)
    [49] A. A. Sonzogni, Nucl. Data Sheets, 95:837 (2002)
    [50] G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, M. Wang, W. J. Huang, and S. Naimi, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030001 (2017)
    [51] P. Mller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, H. Sagawa, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 109:1 (2016)
  • 加载中

Get Citation
V. Dehghani and S. A. Alavi. Empirical formulas for proton decay half-lives: Role of nuclear deformation and Q-value[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 104101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/104101
V. Dehghani and S. A. Alavi. Empirical formulas for proton decay half-lives: Role of nuclear deformation and Q-value[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(10): 104101.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/104101 shu
Milestone
Received: 2018-04-18
Article Metric

Article Views(1582)
PDF Downloads(50)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Empirical formulas for proton decay half-lives: Role of nuclear deformation and Q-value

  • 1. Department of Physics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Abstract: Two empirical formulas for the proton decay half-lives including nuclear deformation are proposed. The formula with parameter set I gives the logarithm of the proton decay half-lives as an explicit function of the orbital angular momentum with eight adjustable parameters, whereas that with set Ⅱ represents the logarithm of the reduced half-lives as an implicit function of the angular momentum with seven adjustable parameters. Experimental data for the half-lives of 44 proton emitters in the ground state or isomeric state were used to obtain the parameters. The experimental and calculated Q values were used. Different sets of parameters were obtained for the ground state transition, isomeric state transition, and all transitions for both deformed and spherical nuclei. The best agreement with experimental data was observed for set I for deformed proton emitters with experimental Q values.

    HTML

Reference (51)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return