Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2023 Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2022 2021 Impact Factor 2.944
Advanced Search
Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(11) : 114102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/11/114102

Band head spin determination of triaxial superdeformed bands in 163,164,165Lu through two-parameter formulae

  • 1.

     Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, 144011, India

  • The two-parameter formulae, i.e. the nuclear softness formula and the power index formula, have been used to obtain the band head spin (I0) of the triaxial superdeformed (SD) bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3), in the A~160 mass region. The least squares fitting approach is used. The values of the root mean square (RMS) deviation among the computed and the measured experimental transition energies are obtained by calculating the model parameters. Whenever accurate spins are available, superb agreement is shown between the determined and the measured experimental transition energies. In comparison to the power index formula, the values of band head spin (I0) of the triaxial SD bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3) obtained by the nuclear softness formula are closer to the experimental data. The lowest RMS deviation is also achieved by the nuclear softness formula. Hence, the nuclear softness formula works well for obtaining the band head spin (I0) for the triaxial SD bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3) in the A~160 mass region. The dynamic moment of inertia against hω is also studied.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中

  • References

    [1] Y. S. Chen, S. Frauendorf, and G. A. Leander, Phys. Rev. C, 28:2437(1983)
    [2] S. Frauendorf and J. Meng, Nucl. Phys. A, 617:131-147(1997)
    [3] B. Crowell, P. Chowdhury, S. J. Freeman et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:1164-1167(1994)
    [4] H. S. Petersen, R. Bengtsson, R. A. Bark et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 594:175-202(1995)
    [5] T. Bengtsson, www.matfys.lth.se/ragnar/TSD.html
    [6] T. Bengtsson, Nucl. Phys. A, 496:56(1989)
    [7] T. Bengtsson, Nucl. Phys. A, 512:124(1990)
    [8] W. Schmitz, H. Hubel, C. X. Yang et al, Phys. Lett. B, 303:230(1993)
    [9] G. Schonwaber, H. Hubel, G. B. Hagemann et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 13:291(2002)
    [10] G. Schonwaber, H. Hubel, G. B. Hagemann et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 15:435-437(2002)
    [11] H. Amro, P. G. Varmette, W. C. Ma et al, Phys. Lett. B, 506:39-44(2001)
    [12] C.X. Yang, X. G. Wu, H. Zheng et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 1:237(1998)
    [13] H. Amro, W. C. Ma, G. B. Hagemann et al, Phys. Lett. B, 553:197(2003)
    [14] A. Neuber, H. Hubel, G. B. Hagemann et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 15:439(2002)
    [15] A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol. 2:(New York:Benjamin, 1975)
    [16] S. W. Odegard, G. B. Hagemann, D. R. Jensen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:5866(2001)
    [17] D. R. Jensen, G. B. Hagemann, I. Hamamoto et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 703:3(2002)
    [18] D.R. Jensen, G. B. Hagemann, I. Hamamoto et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:142503(2002)
    [19] G. Schonwaber, H. Hubel, G. B. Hagemann et al, Phys. Lett. B, 552:9(2003)
    [20] I. Hamamoto, Phys. Rev. C, 65:044305(2002)
    [21] M. Matsuzaki, Y. Shimizu, and K. Matsuyanagi, Phys. Rev. C, 65:041303(R) (2002)
    [22] J. A. Becker, E. A. Henry, A. Kuhnert et al, Phys. Rev. C, 46:889(1992)
    [23] J. Meng, C. S. Wu and J. Y. Zeng, Phys. Rev. C, 44:2545(1991)
    [24] C. S. Wu, J. Y. Zeng, Z. Xing et al, Phys. Rev. C, 45:261(1992)
    [25] S. X. Liu and J. Y. Zeng, Phys. Rev. C, 58:3266(1998)
    [26] D. Bonatsos, S. B. Drenska, P. P. Raychev et al, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 17:L67(1991)
    [27] Y. Liu, J. G. Song, H. Z. Sun et al, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 24:117(1998)
    [28] P. Jain, V. S. Uma and A. Geol, Proceeding of DAE-BRNS Symp. on Nucl. Phys., 61:298-299(2016)
    [29] H. Sharma and H. M. Mittal, Int. J. Mod. Phys E, 26:1750074(2017)
    [30] A. Dadwal, H. M. Mittal, Eur. Phys. J. A, 53:2(2017)
    [31] H. Sharma and H. M. Mittal, Chinese Physics C, 41:124105(2017)
    [32] H. Sharma and H. M. Mittal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 33:1850048(2018)
    [33] H. Sharma and H. M. Mittal, Chinese Physics C, 42:054104(2018)
    [34] R. K. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B, 36:173(1971)
    [35] J. B. Gupta, A. K. Kavathekar, and R. Sharma, Phys. Scr., 51:316(1995)
    [36] X. L Han and C. L. Wu, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables, 73:43(1999)
    [37] B. Singh, R. Zywina, and R. B. Firestone, Nuclear Data Sheets, 97:241-592(2002)

  • Access

    加载中

Get Citation
Honey Sharma and H. M. Mittal. Band head spin determination of triaxial superdeformed bands in 163,164,165Lu through two-parameter formulae[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/11/114102
Honey Sharma and H. M. Mittal. Band head spin determination of triaxial superdeformed bands in 163,164,165Lu through two-parameter formulae[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(11): 114102.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/11/114102 shu
Milestone
Received: 2018-05-24
Revised: 2018-08-02
Article Metric

Article Views(1620)
PDF Downloads(10)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Band head spin determination of triaxial superdeformed bands in 163,164,165Lu through two-parameter formulae

  • 1. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, 144011, India
  • Received Date: 2018-05-24
  • Accepted Date: 2018-08-02
  • Available Online: 2018-11-05

Abstract: The two-parameter formulae, i.e. the nuclear softness formula and the power index formula, have been used to obtain the band head spin (I0) of the triaxial superdeformed (SD) bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3), in the A~160 mass region. The least squares fitting approach is used. The values of the root mean square (RMS) deviation among the computed and the measured experimental transition energies are obtained by calculating the model parameters. Whenever accurate spins are available, superb agreement is shown between the determined and the measured experimental transition energies. In comparison to the power index formula, the values of band head spin (I0) of the triaxial SD bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3) obtained by the nuclear softness formula are closer to the experimental data. The lowest RMS deviation is also achieved by the nuclear softness formula. Hence, the nuclear softness formula works well for obtaining the band head spin (I0) for the triaxial SD bands in 163Lu(1, 2, 3, 4), 164Lu(1, 2, 3) and 165Lu(1, 2, 3) in the A~160 mass region. The dynamic moment of inertia against hω is also studied.

    HTML

Reference (37)

目录

Link
IOPScience
SCOAP3
arXiv
Chinese Physical Society
Journal information
Introduction
Editorial Board
Others
Subscribe
Contact us
QQ: 1307685413
Tel: +86-010-88235947
Fax: +86-010-88233126
E-mail: cpc@ihep.ac.cn

  • CPC Website

  • IOP Website

  • CPC WeChat

Copyright © Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China 京ICP备05002789号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  E-mail: info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return