Is f0 Distinguishable from f2 by One-dimensional Projections of Angular Distributions in J/ψ→fJ→ππKK?

ZHANG Yong-Jun; ZOU Bing-Song

Chinese Physics C> 2004, Vol. 28> Issue(5) : 479-486

Is f₀ Distinguishable from f₂ by One-dimensional Projections of Angular Distributions in J/ψ→f_{J_→ππKK?}

ZHANG Yong-Jun ^, ,
ZOU Bing-Song

Institute of High Energy Physics,CAS,Beijing 100039,China2 Department of Basic Science,Liaoning Technical University,Liaoning 123000,China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
With helicity partial wave analysis formalism, we discuss how one can distinguish f-0 resonance from f2 resonance in the process of J/ψ→fJ(θ1,1) with fJ→ππ(θ2, 2) and →K(θ3, 3) by various projections of angular distributions. We find that f-0 and f2 can give the same one-dimensional angular distributions for I(θ1)∪I(1)∪I(θ2)∪I( 2), but cannot give the same I(θ1)∪I(1)∪I(θ2)∪I(2)∪I( 3). So it is necessary to consider all three decay vertices in order to distinguish f0 from f2 by one-dimensional projections of angular distributions.

References

[1]

. Chung S U. Phys. Rev. , 1993, D48: 1225-12392. Chung S U. Phys. Rev. , 1998, D57: 431-4423. YU Hong, SHEN Qi-Xing. HEP NP, 1990, 14: 504-508(in Chinese )(郁宏,沈齐兴,高能物理与核物理,1990.14:504-5O8)4. YU Hong, SHEN Qi-Xing. HEP NP, 1992, 16: 861-863 (in Chinese )(郁宏,沈齐兴高能物理与核物理,1992,16:861-863)5. ZOU B S, Bugg D V. Euro. Phys. J. , 2003, A16: 537-5476. Dulat S et al. HEP NP, 2004, 17(4) : 350(in Chinese )(沙依甫加马力等,高能物理与核物理,2004, 17(4):350)7. BES Collaboration. Phys. Lett . , 1998, B440: 217-224; Phys. Lett . ,1999, B446: 356 - 362; Phys. Lett. , 2000, B472: 200-206; Phys.Lett. , 2000, B472: 207-214; Phys. Lett . , 2000, B476: 25-32;Phys. Lett. , 2001, B510: 75 -82; Phys. Rev. , 2003, D68: 052003(1-7)

[1]	Ali N , Atashbar Tehrani . Jacobi polynomials and non-singlet structure function F₂(x,Q²) up to N³LO. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1479-1481. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/077
[2]	LU Zhun . Comparing AdS/CFT dipole model to HERA F₂ data. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1421-1424. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/060
[3]	WU Jia-Jun , ZHAO Qiang , ZOU Bing-Song . Study a₀(980)}-f₀(980) mixing in charmonium decays. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 848-854. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/038
[4]	SHEN Cheng-Ping , YUAN Chang-Zheng . Combined fit to BABAR and Belle Data on e⁺e^－→φπ⁺π^－ and φf₀(980). Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(8): 1045-1051. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/8/002
[5]	ZHANG Zhi-Qing , XIAO Zhen-Jun . B→f₀(980) (π,η^(′)) decays in the PQCD approach. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(7): 508-515. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/7/002
[6]	WANG Wei , . Measuring D⁰-D⁰ mixing in D→f₀(980) K^* and more. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(10): 773-775. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/10/001
[7]	ZHAO Xian-Feng , WANG Shun-Jin , ZHANG Hua , JIA Huan-Yu . Effect of f₀(975) and φ(1020) Mesons on Neutron Star Mater. Chinese Physics C, 2007, 31(4): 345-349.
[8]	LI Long , ZOU Bing-Song , LI Guang-Lie . On the Nature of f₀(400-1200). Chinese Physics C, 2002, 26(4): 346-353.
[9]	LI DeMin , FANG Jian , YU Hong , SHEN QiXing . Mixing of the Neutral Tensor Mesons f₂(1270),f′₂(1525) and the Glueball Candidate ξ(2230). Chinese Physics C, 2000, 24(5): 451-456.
[10]	HUI Ping , CHEN QiZhou . 0⁺⁺ Glueball Mass in 2+1-D SU(3) LGT. Chinese Physics C, 2000, 24(9): 805-809.
[11]	Hul Ping . (2+1)-D SU(3)0⁺⁺ Glueball Wavefunction. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(4): 340-346.
[12]	Hu Lian , Hui Ping , Chen Qizhou . Fourth Order Approximation of(2+1)-D Su(2)0⁺⁺ Gluball Wavefunction. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(11): 995-998.
[13]	BES Collaboration . Experiment Study of f₀(975) in J/ψ Decays. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S2): 125-131.
[14]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of f₀ (975) in the J/ψ Decays. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(4): 289-295.
[15]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of Resonance f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(2): 97-106.
[16]	Yu Hong , Shen Qixing . A Study on the Polarization Structure of J/ψ →ωf₂(1270) Decay Process. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S3): 277-280.
[17]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S4): 385-393.
[18]	YU Hong , SHEN Qi-Xing . Study of the Polarization of J/ψ→ωf₂(1270) Decay Process. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(9): 861-864.
[19]	YU Hong , SHEN Qi-Xing , WANG Xu . d WAVE COMPONENTS OF THE GLUEBALL CANDIDATE θ/f₂(1720) AND POSSIBLE EXPERIMENTAL TEST. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(11): 996-1002.
[20]	MA ZHONG-QI , DONG FANG-XIAO , YUE ZONG-WU , ZHOU XIAN-JIAN , XUE PEI-YOU . D⁰-MESON DECAYS Γ（D⁰→K⁺K^-）/Γ（D⁰→π⁺π^-）. Chinese Physics C, 1981, 5(1): 130-133.

Access

Get Citation

ZHANG Yong-Jun and ZOU Bing-Song. Is f₀ Distinguishable from f₂ by One-dimensional Projections of Angular Distributions in J/ψ→f_{J_→ππKK?}[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(5): 479-486.

ZHANG Yong-Jun and ZOU Bing-Song. Is f₀ Distinguishable from f₂ by One-dimensional Projections of Angular Distributions in J/ψ→f_{J_→ππKK?}[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(5): 479-486. shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2003-10-08
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(3165)
PDF Downloads(526)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Is f₀ Distinguishable from f₂ by One-dimensional Projections of Angular Distributions in J/ψ→f_{J_→ππKK?}

ZHANG Yong-Jun ^,
ZOU Bing-Song

Corresponding author: ZHANG Yong-Jun,

Institute of High Energy Physics,CAS,Beijing 100039,China2 Department of Basic Science,Liaoning Technical University,Liaoning 123000,China

Received Date: 2003-10-08
Accepted Date: 1900-01-01
Available Online: 2004-05-05

Abstract: With helicity partial wave analysis formalism, we discuss how one can distinguish f-0 resonance from f2 resonance in the process of J/ψ→fJ(θ1,1) with fJ→ππ(θ2, 2) and →K(θ3, 3) by various projections of angular distributions. We find that f-0 and f2 can give the same one-dimensional angular distributions for I(θ1)∪I(1)∪I(θ2)∪I( 2), but cannot give the same I(θ1)∪I(1)∪I(θ2)∪I(2)∪I( 3). So it is necessary to consider all three decay vertices in order to distinguish f0 from f2 by one-dimensional projections of angular distributions.