Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 816O+50112,116,120Sn reactions

Manjeet Singh Gautam

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102

Chinese Physics C> 2015, Vol. 39> Issue(11) : 114102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions

Manjeet Singh Gautam ^,

1.
School of Physics and Material Science, Thapar University, Patiala (Punjab)-147004, India

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The static and energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potentials are simultaneously used along with the Wong formula for exploration of fusion dynamics of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions. The role of internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding pairs, such as inelastic surface vibrations, are examined within the context of coupled channel calculations performed using the code CCFULL. Theoretical calculations based on the static Woods-Saxon potential along with the one-dimensional Wong formula fail to address the fusion data of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions. Such discrepancies can be removed if one uses couplings to internal structure degrees of freedom of colliding nuclei. However, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) accurately describes the sub-barrier fusion enhancement of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions. Therefore, in sub-barrier fusion dynamics, energy dependence in the nucleus-nucleus potential governs barrier modification effects in a closely similar way to that of the coupled channel approach.
- heavy-ion sub-barrier fusion reactions ,
- depth and diffuseness ,
- {Woods-Saxon} potential ,
- diffuseness anomaly

References

[1]	Beckerman M. Rep. Prog. Phys., 1988, 51: 1047
[2]	Reisdorf W. J. Phys. G, 1994, 20: 1297
[3]	Dasgupta M et al. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 1998, 48: 401
[4]	Balantekin A B, Takigawa N. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1988, 70: 77
[5]	Canto L F et al. Phys. Rep., 2006, 424: 1
[6]	Hagino K, Takigawa N. Prog. Theor. Phys., 2012, 128: 1061
[7]	Back B B et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2014, 86: 317
[8]	Timmers H et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1997, 399: 35
[9]	Trotta M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 011601
[10]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 014610
[11]	Leigh J R et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1995, 52: 3151
[12]	Prasad N V S V et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1996, 603: 176
[13]	ZHANG H Q et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054609
[14]	Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 064608
[15]	Sonzogni A A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 722
[16]	Dasso C H, Pollarolo G. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 68: 054604
[17]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 67: 054603
[18]	Sagaidak R N et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 034605
[19]	WANG N, Scheid W. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 014607
[20]	Ghodsi O N, Gharaei R. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2012, 48: 21
[21]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 1017
[22]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 2012, 21: 1250054
[23]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2011, 55: 649
[24]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Phys. At. Nucl., 2011, 74: 49
[25]	Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 024605
[26]	Hagino K, Rowley N. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 69: 054610
[27]	Mukherjee A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 75: 044608
[28]	Chushnyakova M V, Bhattacharya R, Gontchar I I. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 017603
[29]	Gontchar I I, Bhattacharya R, Chushnyakova M V. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 034601
[30]	Singh M, Duhan S S, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 2129
[31]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 179
[32]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 198
[33]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. AIP Conf. Proc., 2013, 1524: 163
[34]	Singh M, Sukhvinder, Kharab R, Atti Della ''Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi'' Anno LXV, 2010, 6: 751
[35]	Singh M, Phil M. Dissertation (2009) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
[36]	Singh M, Ph.D, Thesis, (2013) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, 2013
[37]	Singh M, Kharab R. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2014, 66: 03043
[38]	Gautam M S. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 024620
[39]	Gautam M S. Nucl. Phys. A, 2015, 933: 272
[40]	Gautam M S. Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 025301, Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 055301
[41]	Gautam M S. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2015, 30: 1550013; Acta Phys. Pol. B, 2015, 46: 1055; Can. J. Phys., 2015, 93: 1
[42]	Tripathi V et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 014614
[43]	Baby L T et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2000, 62: 014603
[44]	Sinha S et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 024607
[45]	Wong C Y. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1973, 31: 766
[46]	Hagino K, Rowley N, Kruppa A T. Comput. Phys. Commun., 1999, 123: 143
[47]	Hill D L, Wheeler J A. Phys. Rev., 1953, 89: 1102
[48]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1997, 55: 276
[49]	Hagino K et al. J. Phys. G, 1997, 23: 1413
[50]	Esbensen H, Fricke S H, Landowne S. Phys. Rev. C, 1989, 40: 2046
[51]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 1349
[52]	Zamrun F M {et al.} Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 81: 044609
[53]	Anjos R M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1990, 42: 354
[54]	Ghodsi O N, Zanganeh V. Nucl. Phys. A, 2010, 846: 40
[55]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054621
[56]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 044606
[57]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79: 064619
[58]	Esbensen H, Misicu S. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 054609
[59]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 679: 95
[60]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2014, 728: 639

References

[1]	Beckerman M. Rep. Prog. Phys., 1988, 51: 1047
[2]	Reisdorf W. J. Phys. G, 1994, 20: 1297
[3]	Dasgupta M et al. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 1998, 48: 401
[4]	Balantekin A B, Takigawa N. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1988, 70: 77
[5]	Canto L F et al. Phys. Rep., 2006, 424: 1
[6]	Hagino K, Takigawa N. Prog. Theor. Phys., 2012, 128: 1061
[7]	Back B B et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2014, 86: 317
[8]	Timmers H et al. Phys. Lett. B, 1997, 399: 35
[9]	Trotta M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 011601
[10]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 014610
[11]	Leigh J R et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1995, 52: 3151
[12]	Prasad N V S V et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 1996, 603: 176
[13]	ZHANG H Q et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054609
[14]	Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 064608
[15]	Sonzogni A A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 722
[16]	Dasso C H, Pollarolo G. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 68: 054604
[17]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2003, 67: 054603
[18]	Sagaidak R N et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 034605
[19]	WANG N, Scheid W. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 014607
[20]	Ghodsi O N, Gharaei R. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2012, 48: 21
[21]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 1017
[22]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 2012, 21: 1250054
[23]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Commun. Theor. Phys., 2011, 55: 649
[24]	Duhan S S, Singh M, Kharab R. Phys. At. Nucl., 2011, 74: 49
[25]	Newton J O et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 024605
[26]	Hagino K, Rowley N. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 69: 054610
[27]	Mukherjee A et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 75: 044608
[28]	Chushnyakova M V, Bhattacharya R, Gontchar I I. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 017603
[29]	Gontchar I I, Bhattacharya R, Chushnyakova M V. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 034601
[30]	Singh M, Duhan S S, Kharab R. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2011, 26: 2129
[31]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 179
[32]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. Nucl. Phys. A, 2013, 897: 198
[33]	Sukhvinder M Singh, Kharab R. AIP Conf. Proc., 2013, 1524: 163
[34]	Singh M, Sukhvinder, Kharab R, Atti Della ''Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi'' Anno LXV, 2010, 6: 751
[35]	Singh M, Phil M. Dissertation (2009) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
[36]	Singh M, Ph.D, Thesis, (2013) (unpublished), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, 2013
[37]	Singh M, Kharab R. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2014, 66: 03043
[38]	Gautam M S. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 90: 024620
[39]	Gautam M S. Nucl. Phys. A, 2015, 933: 272
[40]	Gautam M S. Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 025301, Phys. Scr., 2015, 90: 055301
[41]	Gautam M S. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2015, 30: 1550013; Acta Phys. Pol. B, 2015, 46: 1055; Can. J. Phys., 2015, 93: 1
[42]	Tripathi V et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 65: 014614
[43]	Baby L T et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2000, 62: 014603
[44]	Sinha S et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 64: 024607
[45]	Wong C Y. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1973, 31: 766
[46]	Hagino K, Rowley N, Kruppa A T. Comput. Phys. Commun., 1999, 123: 143
[47]	Hill D L, Wheeler J A. Phys. Rev., 1953, 89: 1102
[48]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1997, 55: 276
[49]	Hagino K et al. J. Phys. G, 1997, 23: 1413
[50]	Esbensen H, Fricke S H, Landowne S. Phys. Rev. C, 1989, 40: 2046
[51]	Hagino K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1998, 57: 1349
[52]	Zamrun F M {et al.} Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 81: 044609
[53]	Anjos R M et al. Phys. Rev. C, 1990, 42: 354
[54]	Ghodsi O N, Zanganeh V. Nucl. Phys. A, 2010, 846: 40
[55]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2010, 82: 054621
[56]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L, Stefanini A M. Phys. Rev. C, 2014, 89: 044606
[57]	Esbensen H, JIANG C L. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79: 064619
[58]	Esbensen H, Misicu S. Phys. Rev. C, 2007, 76: 054609
[59]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 679: 95
[60]	Stefanini A M et al. Phys. Lett. B, 2014, 728: 639

[1]	Samiksha , Manjeet Singh , Vijay , Anand Kumar . Sub-barrier fusion analysis of ⁴⁰Ca + ^46,48,50Ti systems. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(6): 064106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adb8b8
[2]	Kai-Xuan Cheng , Chang Xu , Chun-Wang Ma , Jie Pu , Yu-Ting Wang . Pauli blocking potential applied to heavy-ion fusion reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(2): 024105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac3749
[3]	R. Gharaei , A. Fuji , B. Azadegan . Survey of deep sub-barrier heavy-ion fusion hindrance phenomenon forpositive and negative Q-value systems using the proximity-type potential. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(12): 124101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac23d3
[4]	Lin Gan , Zhi-Hong Li , Hui-Bin Sun , Shi-Peng Hu , Er-Tao Li , Jian Zhong . Systematic study of the Woods-Saxon potential parametersbetween heavy-ions. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(5): 054105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abe84f
[5]	Ishtiaq Ahmed , Abdur Rehman . LHCb anomaly in B→K^*μ⁺μ^- optimised observables and potential of Z' model. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(6): 063103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/063103
[6]	Dong Bai , Zhongzhou Ren . Woods-Saxon-Gaussian potential and alpha-cluster structures ofalpha + closed shell nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(12): 124102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/12/124102
[7]	Pei-Wei Wen , Zhao-Qing Feng , Fan Zhang , Cheng Li , Cheng-Jian Lin , Feng-Shou Zhang . Effect of positive Q-value neutron transfers on sub-barrier fusion reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 064102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064102
[8]	S. A. Alavi , V. Dehghani . Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole deformation and deformed surface diffuseness. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(6): 064104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064104
[9]	Nan-Ru Ma , Hui-Ming Jia , Cheng-Jian Lin , Lei Yang , Xin-Xing Xu , Li-Jie Sun , Feng Yang , Zhen-Dong Wu , Huan-Qiao Zhang , Zu-Hua Liu , Dong-Xi Wang . Self-consistent analysis of sub-barrier fusion enhancement effect in Ca+Ca and Ni+Ni. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(11): 114001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/11/114001
[10]	Manjeet Singh Gautam . Role of projectile breakup effects and intrinsic degrees of freedom on fusion dynamics. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 054101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/054101
[11]	LIU Xing-Xing , ZHANG Gao-Long , ZHANG Huan-Qiao . Study of fusion Q-value rule in sub-barrier fusion of heavy ions. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(7): 074101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/7/074101
[12]	YANG Lin-Meng , GUO Wen-Jun , ZHANG Yun-Peng , ZHANG Xiao-Ji . Probing the symmetry potential with neutron-proton bremsstrahlung in heavy-ion collisions. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 074105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/074105
[13]	E. Maghsoodi , S. Zarrinkamar . Approximate solutions of Dirac equation with a ring-shaped Woods-Saxon potential by Nikiforov-Uvarov method. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(11): 113104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/11/113104
[14]	M. Ghominejad , B. H. Yazarloo , S. Zarrinkamar , H. Hassanabadi . Two-body Spinless Salpeter equation for the Woods-Saxon potential. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(8): 083102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/8/083102
[15]	S. M. Ikhdair , A. A. Rajabi . A semi-relativistic treatment of spinless particles subjectto the nuclear Woods-Saxon potential. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(6): 063101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/6/063101
[16]	XIAO Guo-Qing , ZHANG Hong , LI Qiang , SONG Ming-Tao , YUAN You-Jin , XIA Jia-Wen , ZHAN Wen-Long . Progresses of heavy-ion cancer therapy. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 8-12.
[17]	ZHOU Qing-Ming , ZHANG Hong , LI Qiang , WEI Li-Li , LIU Xin-Guo , GU Meng-Xia , WU Gui-Hong , DAI Zhong-Yin . Rotating wheel filter design and optimization for a uniform depth dose distribution in heavy ion therapy. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 294-298.
[18]	XU Qiang , WANG Ruo-Dong , ZHU Sheng-Jiang . Pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic Woods-Saxon. Chinese Physics C, 2006, 30(3): 207-211.
[19]	TIAN Jun-Long , WU Xi-Zhen , LI Zhu-Xia , WANG Ning , LIU Fu-Hu . Study on Fusion Potential Barrier in Heavy Ion Reactions Based on the Dynamical Model. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(7): 725-732.
[20]	Hu Jimin , Zhong Yunxiao . Interaction Potential Between Heavy Ions in Fusion Reactions. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(S4): 373-378.

Access

Cited by

1.	Ghanghas, V., Chahal, R.P., Gautam, M.S. et al. Formation of 110Sn via fusion of 40Ca + 70Zn, 46Ti + 64Ni and 50Ti + 60Ni reactions[J]. Indian Journal of Physics, 2024, 98(7): 2507-2516. doi: 10.1007/s12648-023-03021-2
2.	Kaur, J., Kaur, A., Gautam, M.S. Role of Centrifugal Potential in the Study of Fusion-Evaporation Analysis of 58Ni-induced Reaction[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, 2974(1): 020021. doi: 10.1063/5.0181924
3.	Karcz, M.J., Messina, L., Kawasaki, E. et al. Semi-supervised generative approach to chemical disorder: application to point-defect formation in uranium-plutonium mixed oxides[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2023, 25(34): 23069-23080. doi: 10.1039/d3cp02790b
4.	Jain, N., Bhuyan, M., Kumar, R. Systematic study of the effect of individual rotational energy levels on the fusion cross-section of 16 O-based reactions of range 480 ≤ Z P Z T ≤ 592[J]. Physica Scripta, 2023, 98(2): 025303. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/acab3d
5.	Ghanghas, V., Chahal, R.P., Duhan, S. et al. Interplay of Neutron Transfer in the Fusion Process of 16O + 112,116,120Sn and 18O + 116Sn Systems at Sub-barrier Energies[J]. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2022, 52(3): 84. doi: 10.1007/s13538-022-01082-y
6.	Vijay, Gautam, M.S., Chahal, R.P., Duhan, S. et al. Comprehensive analysis of heavy-ion fusion reactions around the Coulomb barrier[J]. Physica Scripta, 2022, 97(4): 045305. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac5d72
7.	Vijay, Chahal, R.P., Gautam, M.S., Duhan, S. et al. Fusion cross sections and barrier distributions for O 16 + Ge 70,72,73,74,76 and O 18 + Ge 74 reactions at energies near and below the Coulomb barrier[J]. Physical Review C, 2021, 103(2): 024607. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024607
8.	Gautam, M.S., Duhan, S., Chahal, R.P. et al. Influence of neutron transfer channels and collective excitations in the fusion of Si 28 with Zr 90,92,94,96 targets[J]. Physical Review C, 2020, 102(1): 014614. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014614
9.	Gautam, M.S., Vinod, K., Duhan, S. et al. Investigation of contribution of complete and incomplete fusion in the total fusion process of 6Li+90,96Zr reactions in vicinity of the Coulomb barrier[J]. Nuclear Physics A, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121730
10.	Gautam, M.S., Khatri, H., Vinod, K. Role of nuclear structure degrees of freedom and energy dependent interaction potential in sub-barrier fusion dynamics[J]. Nuclear Physics A, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.01.002
11.	Gautam, M.S.. Inelastic surface vibrations versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus potential in sub-barrier fusion dynamics of 36Li + 62144Sm system[J]. Pramana - Journal of Physics, 2016, 86(5): 1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-1146-x
12.	Gautam, M.S.. Role of Projectile Degrees of Freedom in Sub-Barrier Fusion Dynamics[J]. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2016, 46(2): 143-151. doi: 10.1007/s13538-015-0393-0
13.	Gautam, M.S.. Absence of isotopic dependence of sub-barrier fusion enhancement in the formation of Sn-isotopes via different entrance channels[J]. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2016, 54(1): 86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2016.03.008
14.	Gautam, M.S., Vinod, K., Kumar, H. Fusion suppression/fusion enhancement around the Coulomb barrier[J]. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2016, 54(4): 515-525. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2016.06.005
15.	Singh Gautam, M.. Analysis of nuclear structure effects in sub-barrier fusion dynamics using energy dependent Woods-Saxon potential[J]. Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 2016, 62(5): 398-408.
16.	Gautam, M.S.. Entrance Channel Mass Asymmetry Effects in Sub-Barrier Fusion Dynamics by Using Energy Dependent Woods-Saxon Potential[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2015, 64(6): 710-718. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/64/6/710
17.	Gautam, M.S.. Analysis of fusion dynamics of colliding systems involving stable, loosely bound and halo nuclei[J]. Physica Scripta, 2015, 90(12): 125301. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/12/125301
18.	Gautam, M.S., Kaur, A., Sharma, M.K. Formation and decay analysis of Cd ∗ 4898,104 isotopes in Ca 2040 -induced reactions[J]. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 2015, 92(5): 054605. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054605

Get Citation

Manjeet Singh Gautam. Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/11/114102

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2015-03-27

Fund

Supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India

Article Metric

Article Views(2747)
PDF Downloads(72)
Cited by(18)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions

Abstract：

References

References

Access

Cited by

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Static versus energy-dependent nucleus-nucleus} potential for description of sub-barrier fusion dynamics of ₈¹⁶O+₅₀^112,116,120Sn reactions

Corresponding author: Manjeet Singh Gautam,

HTML

目录