Constraining <em>qqtt</em> operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity

Cen Zhang

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023104

Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(2) : 023104 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023104

Constraining qqtt operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity

Cen Zhang ^,

1.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Recently, experimental collaborations have reported O(10) upper limits on the signal strength of four-top production at the LHC. Surprisingly, we find that the constraining power of four-top production on the qqtt type of operators is already competitive with the measurements of top-pair production, even though the precision level of the latter is more than two orders of magnitude better. This is explained by the enhanced sensitivity of the four-top cross section to qqtt operators, due to multiple insertion of operators in the squared amplitude, and to the large threshold energy of four-top production. We point out that even though the dominant contribution beyond the standard model comes from the O(C⁴4/Λ⁸) terms, the effective field theory expansion remains valid for a wide range of underlying theories. Considering the possible improvements of this measurement with higher integrated luminosity, we believe that this process will become even more crucial for probing and testing the standard model deviations in the top-quark sector, and will eventually provide valuable information about the top-quark properties, leading to significant improvements in precision top physics.
- Top quark ,
- LHC ,
- effective field theory

References

[1]	C. Patrignani et al (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 40(10):100001 (2016)
[2]	G. Bevilacqua and M. Worek, JHEP, 1207:111 (2012)
[3]	J. Alwall et al, JHEP, 1407:079 (2014)
[4]	M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:252004 (2013)
[5]	M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Comput. Phys. Commun., 185:2930 (2014)
[6]	B. Lillie, J. Shu, and T. M. P. Tait, JHEP, 0804:087 (2008)
[7]	A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Phys. Rev. D, 78:074026 (2008)
[8]	K. Kumar, T. M. P. Tait, and R. Vega-Morales, JHEP, 0905:022 (2009)
[9]	G. Cacciapaglia, R. Chierici, A. Deandrea et al, JHEP, 1110:042 (2011)
[10]	M. Perelstein and A. Spray, JHEP, 1109:008 (2011)
[11]	J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, and J. Santiago, Phys. Rev. D, 85:034021 (2012)
[12]	L. Beck, F. Blekman, D. Dobur et al, Phys. Lett. B, 746:48 (2015)
[13]	P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, JHEP, 1412:024 (2014) Erratum:[JHEP, 1511:147 (2015)]
[14]	B. S. Acharya, P. Grajek, G. L. Kane et al, arXiv:0901.3367[hep-ph].
[15]	T. Gregoire, E. Katz, and V. Sanz, Phys. Rev. D, 85:055024 (2012)
[16]	C. Degrande, J. M. Gerard, C. Grojean et al, JHEP, 1103:125 (2011)
[17]	Q. H. Cao, S. L. Chen, and Y. Liu, Phys. Rev. D, 95(5):053004 (2017)
[18]	S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:1566 (1979)
[19]	C. N. Leung, S. T. Love, and S. Rao, Z. Phys. C, 31:433 (1986)
[20]	W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B, 268:621 (1986)
[21]	A. Buckley, C. Englert, J. Ferrando et al, Phys. Rev. D, 92(9):091501 (2015)
[22]	A. Buckley, C. Englert, J. Ferrando et al, JHEP, 1604:015 (2016)
[23]	The ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2012-130
[24]	CMS Collaboration CMS-PAS-TOP-13-012
[25]	G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), JHEP, 1508:105 (2015)
[26]	The ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2016-013
[27]	The ATLAS collaboration ATLAS-CONF-2016-020
[28]	The ATLAS collaboration (ATLAS Collaboration), ATLAS-CONF-2016-104
[29]	A. M. Sirunyan et al (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 772:336 (2017)
[30]	A. M. Sirunyan et al (CMS Collaboration), arXiv:1704.07323[hep-ex]
[31]	M. Aaboud et al (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:1704.08493[hep-ex]
[32]	E. Alvarez, D. A. Faroughy, J. F. Kamenik et al, Nucl. Phys. B, 915:19 (2017)
[33]	C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D, 83:034006 (2011)
[34]	J. de Blas, M. Chala, and J. Santiago, JHEP, 1509:189 (2015)
[35]	R. D. Ball et al (NNPDF Collaboration), JHEP, 1504:040 (2015)
[36]	C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks et al, Comput. Phys. Commun., 183:1201 (2012)
[37]	A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande et al, Comput. Phys. Commun., 185:2250 (2014)
[38]	O. Bessidskaia Bylund, F. Maltoni, I. Tsinikos et al, JHEP, 1605:052 (2016)
[39]	C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni et al, in preparation
[40]	G. Servant, doi:10.3204/DESY-PROC-2010-01/251
[41]	B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak et al, JHEP, 1010:085 (2010)
[42]	CMS Collaboration CMS-PAS-TOP-14-016
[43]	F. Krauss, S. Kuttimalai, and T. Plehn, Phys. Rev. D, 95(3):035024 (2017)
[44]	T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. D, 11:2856 (1975).
[45]	A. Biekotter, A. Knochel, M. Kramer et al, Phys. Rev. D, 91:055029 (2015)
[46]	R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz et al, JHEP, 1607:144 (2016)
[47]	A. Butter, O. J. P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile et al, JHEP, 1607:152 (2016)
[48]	A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo et al, JHEP, 1702:115 (2017)
[49]	A. Pomarol, Higgs Physics, in Proceedings of the 2014 European School of High-Energy Physics (ESHEP 2014):edited by M. Mulders, G. Zanderigh, p.59
[50]	C. Degrande, N. Greiner, W. Kilian et al, Annals Phys., 335:21 (2013)
[51]	A. Kobach, Phys. Lett. B, 758:455 (2016)
[52]	G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 74(10):3109 (2014) Addendum:[Eur. Phys. J. C, 76:no. 11:642 (2016)]
[53]	A. M. Sirunyan et al (CMS Collaboration), arXiv:1701.06228[hep-ex]
[54]	M. P. Rosello and M. Vos, Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(4):200 (2016)
[55]	L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski et al, Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(5):204 (2015)
[56]	S. Dulat et al, Phys. Rev. D, 93(3):033006 (2016)
[57]	T. A. Aaltonen et al (CDF and D0 Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D, 89(7):072001 (2014)
[58]	M. Aaboud et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 761:136 (2016)
[59]	M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(5):052001 (2015)
[60]	(CDF and D0 Collaborations), FERMILAB-CONF-16-386-PPD, CDF-NOTE-11206, D0-NOTE-6492.
[61]	W. Bernreuther and Z. G. Si, Phys. Rev. D, 86:034026 (2012)
[62]	G. Aad et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(2):87 (2016)
[63]	V. Khachatryan et al (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 93(3):034014 (2016)
[64]	T. Sjostrand, P. Eden, C. Friberg et al, Comput. Phys. Commun., 135:238 (2001)
[65]	M. Aaboud et al (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 94(9):092003 (2016)

[1]	N. Amangeldi , N. Burtebayev , G. Yergaliuly , Maulen Nassurlla , B. Balabekov , Abylay Tangirbergen , Awad A. Ibraheem , Mohamed A. Dewidar , Sh. Hamada . Breakup of ⁷Li in the field of ^118,120Sn nuclei and its effect on the elastic scattering channel. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[2]	Y. P. Wang , Y. K. Wang , P. W. Zhao . Tilted-axis-cranking covariant density functional theory for the high-spin spectroscopy in ⁶⁹Ga. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-5. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae07b8
[3]	Abdel Magied DIAB . Charmed meson structure across crossover from SU(4) Polyakov quark meson model with isospin asymmetry. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 013101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042d
[4]	Ayan Banerjee , Indrani Karar , Javlon Rayimbaev , Inomjon Ibragimov , Sardor Murodov , Sokhibjan Muminov , Sardor Jumaniyozov . Existence of quark stars in gravity's Rainbow: the significance of strongly interacting quark matter. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[5]	Jingxuan Chen , Xiaopeng Wang , Yanbing Cai , Xurong Chen , Qian Wang . Valence quark distributions of pions: insights from Tsallis entropy. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 013103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae0998
[6]	Renli Xu , Chen Wu , Jian Liu , Bin Hong , Jie Peng , Xiong Li , Ruxian Zhu , Zhizhen Zhao , Zhongzhou Ren . Ground-state properties of finite nuclei in relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory with an improved quark mass density-dependent model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[7]	Jialin He , Xinye Peng , Zhongbao Yin , Liang Zheng . Extracting the kinetic freeze-out properties of high energy pp collisions at the LHC with event shape classifiers. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-16.
[8]	Minghui Ding , Fei Gao , Sebastian M. Schmidt . Anisotropic quark propagation and Zeeman effect in an external magnetic field. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-19.
[9]	Qi-Quan Li , Yu Zhang , Hoernisa Iminniyaz . Rotating and non-linear magnetic-charged black hole with an anisotropic matter field. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade0a9
[10]	Xufen Zhang , De-Cheng Zou , Chao-Ming Zhang , Ming Zhang , Rui-Hong Yue . Perturbations of massless external fields on magnetically charged black holes in string-inspired Euler-Heisenberg theory. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105109. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade661
[11]	Shuo Yang , Yi-Hang Wang , Peng-Bo Zhao , Ji-Long Ma . Search for heavy vector-like B quark via pair production in fully hadronic channels at CLIC. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 113101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf183
[12]	Saba Noor , Faisal Akram , Bilal Masud . Study of excited D and D_s mesons in a relativized quark model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 113102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec50
[13]	Zhi-Lei Ma , Zhun Lu , Hao Liu , Li Zhang . Inelastic heavy quarkonium photoproduction in p-p and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1ca
[14]	Mikael Chala , Luis Gil , Zhe Ren . Phase transitions in dimensional reduction up to three loops. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 123105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf322
[15]	Siyu Tang , Zuman Zhang , Chao Zhang , Liang Zheng , Renzhuo Wan . Investigating the transverse-momentum- and pseudorapidity-dependent flow vector decorrelation in p–Pb collisions with a multi-phase transport model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adef1b
[16]	BAO Ai-Dong , YAO Hai-Bo , WU Shi-Shu . Topological approach to examine the singularity of the axial-vector current in an Abelian gauge field theory (QED). Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(3): 177-180. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/003
[17]	HU Xi-Duo , SHAO Ming-Zhu , LUO Shi-Yu , LIU Yong-Sheng , ZHU De-Hai . Average Field Idea and Single Particle Model for 2 Dimension Crystallization Beams(Ⅱ). Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(2): 196-199.
[18]	Guo Hua . In-medium QMC Model Parameters and Quark Condensation in Nuclear Matter. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(5): 459-468.
[19]	Yang Jianjun , Ma Boqiang , Li Guanglie . Non-perturbative Quark Propagator and the Study of the Non-trivial Q² Dependence in the Nucleon Structure Functions. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(2): 146-156.
[20]	Sa Ben-hao , Zhang Xi-zhen , Li Zhu-xia , Shi Yi-jin . A PRIMARY RESEARCH OF THE PHONON RENORMALIZATION OF NUCLEAR FIELD THEORY. Chinese Physics C, 1980, 4(3): 398-400.

Access

Get Citation

Cen Zhang. Constraining qqtt operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(2): 023104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023104

Cen Zhang. Constraining qqtt operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(2): 023104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023104 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-08-22

Fund

Supported by the 100-talent project of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Article Metric

Article Views(2922)
PDF Downloads(25)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Constraining qqtt operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Constraining qqtt operators from four-top production: a case for enhanced EFT sensitivity

Corresponding author: Cen Zhang,

HTML

目录