Finite-size behaviour of generalized susceptibilities in the whole phase plane of the Potts model

Xue Pan; Yanhua Zhang; Lizhu Chen; Mingmei Xu; Yuanfang Wu

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023110

Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(2) : 023110 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023110

Finite-size behaviour of generalized susceptibilities in the whole phase plane of the Potts model

Xue Pan ^1,2,, ,
Yanhua Zhang ² ,
Lizhu Chen ³ ,
Mingmei Xu ² ,
Yuanfang Wu ²

1.
School of Electronic Engineering, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu 611730, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics(MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics(MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
4.
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
We study the sign distribution of generalized magnetic susceptibilities in the temperature-external magnetic field plane using the three-dimensional three-state Potts model. We find that the sign of odd-order susceptibility is opposite in the symmetric (disorder) and broken (order) phases, but that of the even-order one remains positive when it is far away from the phase boundary. When the critical point is approached from the crossover side, negative fourth-order magnetic susceptibility is observable. It is also demonstrated that non-monotonic behavior occurs in the temperature dependence of the generalized susceptibilities of the energy. The finite-size scaling behavior of the specific heat in this model is mainly controlled by the critical exponent of the magnetic susceptibility in the three-dimensional Ising universality class.
- Potts model ,
- critical point ,
- generalized susceptibilities

References

[1]	J. Adams et al (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A, 757:102 (2005)
[2]	P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B, 642:290 (2002)
[3]	S. Ejiri, Phys. Rev. D, 78:074507 (2008)
[4]	E. S. Bowman and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C, 79:015202 (2009)
[5]	M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:4816 (1998)
[6]	P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:152001 (2010)
[7]	Bazavov A, Ding H T, Hegde P et al, Phys. Rev. D, 95:054504 (2017)
[8]	Y. Aoki, G. Endrdi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szab, Nature, 443:675 (2006)
[9]	M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D, 60:114028 (1999)
[10]	V. Koch, arXiv:0810.2520
[11]	M. Cheng et al, Phys. Rev. D, 79:074505 (2009)
[12]	L. Adamczyk et al (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:032302 (2014)
[13]	L. Adamczyk et al (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:092301 (2014)
[14]	F. Karsch, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 10:1234 (2012)
[15]	A. Bazavov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:192302 (2012)
[16]	R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Rev. D, 92:114505 (2015)
[17]	S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:062005 (2013); Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:052301 (2014)
[18]	M. Asakawa, S. Ejiri, and M. Kitazawa, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:262301 (2009)
[19]	W. J. Fu and Y. L. Wu, Phys. Rev. D, 82:074013 (2010)
[20]	M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:052301 (2011)
[21]	B. Friman, F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and V. Skokov, Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1694 (2011)
[22]	J. W. Chen, J. Deng, H. Kohyama, and L. Labun, Phys. Rev. D, 93:034037 (2016); Phys. Rev. D, 95:014038 (2017)
[23]	X. Pan, L. Z. Chen, X. S. Chen, and Y. F. Wu, Nucl. Phys. A, 913:206 (2013)
[24]	A. Patel, Nucl. Phys. B, 243:411 (1984); A. Patel, Phys. Lett. B, 139:394 (1984)
[25]	H. W. J. Blte and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:799 (1979)
[26]	W. Janke and R. Villanova, Nucl. Phys. B, 489:679 (1997)
[27]	F. Karsch and S. Stickan, Phys. Lett. B, 488:319 (2000)
[28]	X. Pan, M. M. Xu, and Y. F. Wu, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys., 42:015104 (2015)
[29]	F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys., 54:235 (1982)
[30]	U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62:361 (1989)
[31]	V. Privman and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B, 30:322 (1984)
[32]	X. S. Chen, V. Dohm, and A. L. Talapov, Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 232:375 (1996)
[33]	V. Privman, Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems (Singapore:World Scientific) (1990)
[34]	H. W. J. Blte, E. Luijten, and J. R. Heringa, J. Phys. A:Math. Gen., 28:6289 (1995)

[1]	Qing-Wu Wang , Xiao-Fu Łü , Hua-Zhong Guo . $ {\boldsymbol\rho\bf\to \boldsymbol\pi\boldsymbol\pi }$ Hadronic Decay in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model: Mass-Width Interplay and Beyond-RPA Corrections. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-7.
[2]	Renli Xu , Chen Wu , Jian Liu , Bin Hong , Jie Peng , Xiong Li , Ruxian Zhu , Zhizhen Zhao , Zhongzhou Ren . Ground-state properties of finite nuclei in relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory with an improved quark mass density-dependent model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-12.
[3]	Abdel Magied DIAB . Charmed meson structure across crossover from SU(4) Polyakov quark meson model with isospin asymmetry. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 013101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042d
[4]	Zetian Li , Ning Liu , Bin Zhu . Interplay of 95 GeV Diphoton Excess and Dark Matter in Supersymmetric Triplet Model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(3): 1-11.
[5]	Ali Çiçi , Hüseyin Dağ . Resolving the W boson Mass in the Lepton Specific Two Higgs Doublet Model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(3): 1-19.
[6]	Wen-Chao Dai , Jie-Dong Jiang , Yin Fan , Xiao Liu , Peng-Cheng Chu , Xi-Jun Wu , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α decay half-life within cluster-formation model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 014103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042c
[7]	Zhe Wang , Quan Liu , Jian-You Guo . Examination of proton radioactivity in exotic nuclei with a deformed Gamow-like model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042f
[8]	Muhammad Farhan Taseer , Subhash Singha . Impact of particle production mechanisms on pseudorapidity distribution and directed flow in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at ${ \sqrt{{\boldsymbol s}_{\boldsymbol{ NN}}}}$ = 19.6 GeV using AMPT model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade660
[9]	Siyu Tang , Zuman Zhang , Chao Zhang , Liang Zheng , Renzhuo Wan . Investigating the transverse-momentum- and pseudorapidity-dependent flow vector decorrelation in p–Pb collisions with a multi-phase transport model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adef1b
[10]	Liuxin Zhao , Honglei Li , Zhi-Long Han , Fei Huang , Xinyi Yan . Extra charged gauge boson W′ in Alternative Left-Right Model at future muon collider. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 123102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec51
[11]	Fan Yang , Xiangyun Fu , Bing Xu , Kaituo Zhang , Yang Huang , Ying Yang . Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using Type Ia supernovae and radio quasars through model-independent methods. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 105108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4a3
[12]	Sen Guo , Pei Wang , Ke-Jian He , Guo-Ping Li , Xiao-Xiong Zeng , Wen-Hao Deng . A novel jet model for the Novikov-Thorne disk and its observable impact. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(8): 085104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/add10e
[13]	Saba Noor , Faisal Akram , Bilal Masud . Study of excited D and D_s mesons in a relativized quark model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 113102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec50
[14]	Xin-Xin Qi , Hao Sun . Copositive criteria for a two-component dark matter model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade4b7
[15]	Hong-Lei Li , Peng-Cheng Lu , Cong-Feng Qiao , Zong-Guo Si , Ying Wang . Study of the Standard Model and Majorana neutrino contributions to ${ B}^{{ +}} { \to} { K}^{{ (*){ \pm}}}{ \mu}^{ +}{ \mu}^{{ \mp}}$. Chinese Physics C, 2019, 43(2): 023101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/2/023101
[16]	D. Banerjee , S. Sahoo . Analysis of λ_b→λ l⁺l^- rare decays in a non-universal Z' model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/083101
[17]	HU Xi-Duo , SHAO Ming-Zhu , LUO Shi-Yu , LIU Yong-Sheng , ZHU De-Hai . Average Field Idea and Single Particle Model for 2 Dimension Crystallization Beams(Ⅱ). Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(2): 196-199.
[18]	Guo Hua . In-medium QMC Model Parameters and Quark Condensation in Nuclear Matter. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(5): 459-468.
[19]	ZHU Xiang , SHEN Wen-Qing , HU Xiao-Qing , ZHU Yong-Tai , WANG Bing . A SIMPLE MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE INCOMPLETE DIC REACTION. Chinese Physics C, 1990, 14(9): 835-841.

Access

Get Citation

Xue Pan, Yanhua Zhang, Lizhu Chen, Mingmei Xu and Yuanfang Wu. Finite-size behaviour of generalized susceptibilities in the whole phase plane of the Potts model[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(2): 023110. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/2/023110

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-09-29
Revised: 2017-12-03

Fund

Supported by Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (11647093, 11405088, 11521064), Fund Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education (16ZB0339), Fund Project of Chengdu Technological University (2016RC004) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2014CB845402)

Article Metric

Article Views(2861)
PDF Downloads(19)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Finite-size behaviour of generalized susceptibilities in the whole phase plane of the Potts model

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

Finite-size behaviour of generalized susceptibilities in the whole phase plane of the Potts model

Corresponding author: Xue Pan,

HTML

目录