<em>&alpha;</em> decay properties of <sup>296</sup>Og within the two-potential approach

Jun-Gang Deng; Jie-Cheng Zhao; Jiu-Long Chen; Xi-Jun Wu; Xiao-Hua Li

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(4) : 044102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

1.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
2.
School of Math and Physics, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
3.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
4.
Cooperative Innovation Center for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technology &
5.
Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The present work is a continuation of our previous paper[J.-G. Deng, et al., Chin. Phys. C, 41:124109 (2017)]. In the present work, the α decay half-life of the unknown nucleus ²⁹⁶Og is predicted within the two-potential approach and the hindrance factors of all 20 even-even nuclei in the same region as ²⁹⁶Og, i.e. proton number 82 < Z < 126 and neutron number 152 < N < 184, from ²⁵⁰Cm to ²⁹⁴Og, are extracted. The prediction is 1.09 ms within a factor of 5.12. In addition, based on the latest experimental data, a new set of parameters of α decay hindrance factors for the even-even nuclei in this region, considering the shell effect and proton-neutron interaction, are obtained.
- decay ,
- 296Og ,
- hindrance factor ,
- two-potential approach

References

[1]	S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, Z. Szymaski et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 131:1-66 (1969)
[2]	H. Meldner, Ark. Fys., 36:593-8 (1967)
[3]	A. Sobiczewski, F. Gareev, and B. Kalinkin, Phys. Lett., 22:500-502 (1962)
[4]	U. Mosel and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. A, 222:261-282 (1969)
[5]	K. P. Santhosh and C. Nithya, Phys. Rev. C, 94:054621 (2016)
[6]	Y. T. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Y. V. Lobanov, F. S. Abdullin et al, Phys. Rev. C, 76:011601 (2007)
[7]	Y. T. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Y. V. Lobanov, F. S. Abdullin et al, Phys. Rev. C, 74:044602 (2006)
[8]	Y. Oganessian, J. Phys. G, 34:R165 (2007)
[9]	Y. T. Oganessian, F. S. Abdullin, P. D. Bailey, D. E. Benker et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:142502 (2010)
[10]	P. A. Ellison, K. E. Gregorich, J. S. Berryman et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:182701 (2010)
[11]	S. Hofmann, S. Heinz, R. Mann, J. Maurer et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 48:62 (2012)
[12]	Y. T. Oganessian and K. P. Rykaczewski, Phys. Today, 68:32-38 (2015)
[13]	A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C, 94:051302 (R) (2016)
[14]	X. J. Bao, S. Q. Guo, H. F. Zhang, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:034323 (2017)
[15]	A. Parkhomenko and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 36:3095 (2005)
[16]	P. Mller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 59:185-381 (1995)
[17]	J. Duflo and A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C, 52:R23-R27 (1995)
[18]	R. C. Nayak and L. Satpathy, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 98:616-719 (2012)
[19]	N. Wang and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. C, 84:051303 (R) (2011)
[20]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C, 93:014302 (2016)
[21]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Lett. B, 734:215-219 (2014)
[22]	I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 32:691 (2001)
[23]	A. Sobiczewski and K. Pomorski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 58:292-349 (2007)
[24]	A. N. Kuzmina, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C, 85:014139 (2012)
[25]	S. Goriely, N. Chamel, and J. M. Pearson, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034337 (2016)
[26]	S. Liran, A. Marinov, and N. Zeldes, Phys. Rev. C, 62:047301 (2000)
[27]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:3-128 (2003)
[28]	A. H. Wapstra, G. Audi and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:129-336 (2003)
[29]	G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra and C Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:337-676 (2003)
[30]	P. Mohr, Phys. Rev. C, 95:011302 (R) (2017)
[31]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034316 (2016)
[32]	X.-D. Sun, J.-G. Deng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:044303 (2017)
[33]	X.-D. Sun, C. Duan, J.-G. Deng, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:014319 (2017)
[34]	J.-G. Deng, J.-H. Cheng, B. Zheng and X.-H. Li, Chin. Phys. C, 41:124109 (2017)
[35]	S. A. Gurvitz and G. Kalbermann, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59:262-265 (1987)
[36]	S. A. Gurvitz, P. B. Semmes, W. Nazarewicz, and T. Vertse, Phys. Rev. A, 69:042705 (2004)
[37]	G. Audi, F. Kondev, M.Wang, W. Huang, and S. Naimi, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030001 (2017)
[38]	W. J. Huang, G. Audi, M.Wang, F. Kondev, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030002 (2017)
[39]	M. Wang, G. Audi, F. Kondev, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030003 (2017)
[40]	J.-G. Deng, J.-C. Zhao, D. Xiang and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 96:024318 (2017)
[41]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 85:027306 (2012)
[42]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 852:82-91 (2011)
[43]	Y. Qian, Z. Ren, and D. Ni, Nucl. Phys. A, 866:1-15 (2011)
[44]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 94:024338 (2016)
[45]	X.-D. Sun, X.-J. Wu, B. Zheng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Chin. Phys. C, 41:014102 (2017)
[46]	H. F. Zhang and G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C, 77:054318 (2008)
[47]	C. Qi, Rev. Phys., 1:77-89 (2016)
[48]	W. M. Seif, M. M. Botros, and A. I. Refaie, Phys. Rev. C, 92:044302 (2015)
[49]	C. Xu, Z. Ren, G. Rpke, P. Schuck et al, Phys. Rev. C, 93:011306 (R) (2016)
[50]	C. Xu, G. Rpke, P. Schuck, Z. Ren et al, Phys. Rev. C, 95:061306 (R) (2017)
[51]	C. Xu and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 760:303-316 (2005)
[52]	S. Guo, X. Bao, Y. Gao, J. Li, and H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. A, 934:110-120 (2015)
[53]	H. F. Zhang, G. Royer, Y. J. Wang, J. M. Dong, W. Zuo, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 80:057301 (2009)
[54]	B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65:2975-2977 (1990)
[55]	G. Royer, J. Phys. G, 26:1149 (2000)
[56]	J. J. Morehead, J. Math. Phys., 36:5431-5452 (1995)
[57]	Y. J. Yao, G. L. Zhang, W. W. Qu and J. Q. Qian, Eur. Phys. J. A, 51:122 (2015)
[58]	K. P. Santhosh and B. Priyanka, Phys. Rev. C, 87:064611 (2013)

[1]	Qing-Wu Wang , Xiao-Fu Łü , Hua-Zhong Guo . $ {\boldsymbol\rho\bf\to \boldsymbol\pi\boldsymbol\pi }$ Hadronic Decay in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model: Mass-Width Interplay and Beyond-RPA Corrections. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-7.
[2]	Wen-Chao Dai , Jie-Dong Jiang , Yin Fan , Xiao Liu , Peng-Cheng Chu , Xi-Jun Wu , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α decay half-life within cluster-formation model. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 014103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae042c
[3]	Rui Zhu , Gen Zhang , Xiao-Ye Zhang , Zi-Long Wang , Yue-Long Zhang , Jia-Le Cao , Feng-Shou Zhang . Synthesis of unknown ^287−290Og isotopes infusion-evaporation reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec4d
[4]	Xi-Liang Yuan , Chao Wang , Zhuang-Dong Bai , Gang Lü . Role and contribution of the resonance effect for the decay process of ${ \bar {\boldsymbol B}^{\bf 0}_{\boldsymbol s} \boldsymbol\rightarrow \boldsymbol\pi^{+}\boldsymbol\pi^{-}{\boldsymbol P}}$. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 113103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade6d8
[5]	Jin-Yu Huo , Rui Chen . Exploring the two-body strong decay properties of the possible ${\boldsymbol\Lambda_{\boldsymbol c}\boldsymbol K^{}}$ and ${\boldsymbol\Sigma_{\boldsymbol c}\boldsymbol K^{()}}$ molecules. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103108. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec4e
[6]	. Bayesian and Monte Carlo approaches to estimating uncertainty for the measurement of the bound-state β^- decay of ²⁰⁵Tl⁸¹⁺. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 114001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade956
[7]	Yang Liu , Rong Wang , Zaiba Mushtaq , Ye Tian , Xionghong He , Hao Qiu , Xurong Chen . Simulation of dark scalar particle sensitivity in η rare decay channels at HIAF. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(3): 034103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad9d1b
[8]	. Search for the lepton number violation decay ω→π⁺π⁺e⁻e⁻+c.c.. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade955
[9]	. Investigation of the α-decay half-lives for even-even nuclei within a deformed two-potential approach. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124111. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae0430
[10]	Yang-Yang Xu , De-Xing Zhu , You-Tian Zou , Xi-Jun Wu , Biao He , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study on α-decay half-lives of uranium isotopes with a screened electrostatic barrier. Chinese Physics C, 2022, 46(11): 114103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7fe8
[11]	Peng Yin , Jianmin Dong , Wei Zuo . Effect of tensor correlations on the depletion of nuclear Fermi sea within the extended BHF approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/11/114102
[12]	BAO Ai-Dong , YAO Hai-Bo , WU Shi-Shu . Topological approach to examine the singularity of the axial-vector current in an Abelian gauge field theory (QED). Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(3): 177-180. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/003
[13]	FAN Ping , YUAN Da-Qing , ZUO Yi , ZHENG Yong-Nan , ZHOU Dong-Mei , WU Xiao-Guang , LI Guang-Sheng , ZHU Li-Hua , XU Guo-Ji , FAN Qi-Wen , ZHANG Xi-Zhen , ZHU Sheng-Yun . Proton alignment in ⁸²Sr investigated by g-factor measurements. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 206-208. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/066
[14]	SHEN Shui-Fa , YU Xiao-Han . Decay of ⁸³Sr and Discussion of Its Daughter's Band Structures. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(S1): 78-80.
[15]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of Resonance f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(2): 97-106.
[16]	WU SHI-SHU . ON NUCLEAR SINGLE-PARTICLE POTENTIALS（Ⅲ）SINGLEPARTICLE ENERGIES DETERMINED BY THE NONHERMITIAN POTENTIAL U_αβ=M_αβ（ε_β）. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(4): 469-483.

Access

Get Citation

Jun-Gang Deng, Jie-Cheng Zhao, Jiu-Long Chen, Xi-Jun Wu and Xiao-Hua Li. α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(4): 044102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-12-12

Fund

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11205083, 11505100), the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province, the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (15A159), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2015JJ3103, 2015JJ2121), the Innovation Group of Nuclear and Particle Physics in USC, the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2015AQ007) and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate (CX2017B536)

Article Metric

Article Views(2930)
PDF Downloads(30)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Xi-Jun Wu,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of 296Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article

α decay properties of 296Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Xi-Jun Wu,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach