Finite size effect on dissociation and diffusion of chiral partners in Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model

  • The masses of pion and sigma meson modes, along with their dissociation in the quark medium, provide detailed spectral structures of the chiral partners. Collectivity has been observed in pA and pp systems both at LHC and RHIC. In this research, we studied the restoration of chiral symmetry by investigating the finite size effect on the detailed structure of chiral partners in the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. Their diffusion and conduction have been studied using this dissociation mechanism. It is determined that the masses, widths, diffusion coefficients, and conductivities of chiral partners merge at different temperatures in the restoration phase of chiral symmetry. However, merging points are shifted to lower temperatures when finite size effect is introduced into the picture. The strengths of diffusions and conductions are also reduced once the finite size is introduced in the calculations.
  • The nuclear matter formed in heavy-ion collision experiments, such as those in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC), has a finite volume and lifetime in fm and fm/c scale, respectively. Initially, a hot quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is expected to be formed, which then expands, and after a particular time, the medium freezes out with a specific volume. Experimentally, this freeze-out volume can be measured via the Hanbury-Brown-Twiss (HBT) methodology, whose details can be found in review articles [1,2] and references therein. The freeze-out volume of the matter depends on the size of the colliding nuclei, center-of-mass energy, and collision centrality [3]. A freeze-out volume in the range of 2000–3000 fm3 is presented for a large range of center-of-mass energies s in Ref. [4], while the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics calculations predict a volume range of 50–250 fm3 [5,6]. Hence, it becomes crucial to understand the finite size effect on different phenomenological quantities within the uncertainties in the volume of the strongly interacting matter created at RHIC or LHC.

    The effects of finite volume have been addressed in several models such as the non-interacting bag model [7], quark-meson (QM) model Refs. [8-14], Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model [15-22], Polyakov loop extended NJL (PNJL) [23-26], Polyakov loop extended linear sigma model (PLSM) [27], hadron resonance gas (HRG) [28-34], and Walecka model [35,36]. All of the model calculations invariably infer that the quark-hadron phase diagram depends on the volume of the matter formed in these collisions. Among the NJL and PNJL model studies [15-26] on finite size effect, only Ref. [21] has studied the effect of finite size on meson masses. However, a detailed investigation of their dissociation probability, along with their masses in the quark medium, would provide a complete picture. As a first step and for the first time, we investigate the spectral and dissipation properties of the lightest chiral partners, namely, the π and σ mesons.

    The remainder of this article is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we present the formalism part, which has two subsections. In Sec. II.A, the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the finite size is introduced. In Sec. II.B, the framework of diffusion and conductivity is constructed for mesonic modes. After addressing the formalism part, we explore the numerical results of masses, decay widths, diffusion coefficients, conductivities of the mesonic modes, and their finite size effect in Sec. III. Finally, we summarize our investigation in Sec. IV.

    We consider the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model [37,38], through which we can obtain temperature-dependent quark and meson masses from hadronic to quark temperature domains, within which a crossover type phase transition can be developed as predicted by lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) calculations.

    We adopt a two-flavor model with a degenerate mass for u and d quarks. The Lagrangian density (for any quark flavor) can be expressed as

    L=ˉqγμiμqmqˉqq+G[(ˉqq)2+(ˉqiγ5τaq)2],

    (1)

    where flavor summation is not explicitly shown and mq denotes the bare quark mass. The τa are Pauli matrices acting in flavor space. Owing to the dynamical breaking of chiral symmetry in the NJL model, the chiral condensate Σˉqq acquires a non-zero vacuum expectation value. The constituent mass at the zero quark chemical potential and temperature can be obtained from the gap equation,

    Mq=mq2GΣ=mq+4NfNcGd3p(2π)3MqEp[12np],

    (2)

    where np=1/(eβEp+1) represents the Fermi-Dirac (FD) distribution of quark with energy Ep=p2+M2q, zero quark chemical potential, and temperature T=1/β. Here, the flavor degeneracy factor Nf=2 and color degeneracy factor Nc=3 are considered, while mq and Mq are current and constituent quark masses, respectively. The temperature-independent part of the integral of Eq. (2) is ultraviolet divergent, while the temperature-dependent part, which contains the Fermi-Dirac distribution function np is finite. We use an ultraviolet cutoff Λ to regularize the divergent integral while the T-dependent integral is integrated without a cutoff. By tuning different fitted parameters [39] Λ=651 MeV, mq=5.5 MeV, and GΛ2=2.1, we obtain feasible values for the quark condensate Σ(T=0)=2(251 MeV)3 [40], pion leptonic decay constant (92.3 MeV), and pion mass (mπ=139.5 MeV) in a vacuum. The diagrammatic representation of Eq. (2) is presented in Fig. 1. In the mean-field approximation, the thermodynamic potential Ω can be obtained as

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Diagrammatic representation of Eq. (2), which establishes the connection between dressed quark (double solid line) with constituent mass Mf and bare quark (single solid line) with current quark mass mf.

    Ω=2NcNfd3p(2π)3p2+M22NcNfTd3p(2π)3(ln(1+exp((Eμ)T))+ln(1+exp((E+μ)T)))+(Mm)24G

    (3)

    where each term bears its usual significance, which can be found in [39,40].

    Next, to study mesonic states as a quark condensate, the conventional step is to iterate the four-point vertex as presented in Fig. 2, which interprets that infinite series of quark-anti-quark loops are equivalent to a meson propagator [37,38,40,41]. The mesonic polarization function Ππ,σ is given as

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Diagrammatic representation of the transformation of a quark-quark interaction into an effective π, σ meson propagators (double dash line).

    ΠM,Mπ,σ(ω,q)=λd4p(2π)4Tr(γMS(p+q)γMS(q))

    (4)

    where S(p) denotes the Hartree quark propagator. γM refers to the scalar or pseudoscalar interaction vertex and the index M denotes the scalar or pseudoscalar interaction channel. The polarization function can be expressed as [40]

    ΠM,M=I1(ω2q2ϵ2M,M)I2(ω,q)

    (5)

    where

    I1=NcNfλd3p(2π)31Ep[tanhβ(Ep+μ)2+tanhβ(Epμ)2]

    (6)

    and the function I2(ω,q) given as

    I2(ω,q)=NcNfλd3p(2π)312EpE(p+q)×{1ω+EpEp+q[n(Epμ)n(Ep+qμ)+n(Ep+qμ)n(Epμ)]+[1ωEpEp+q1ω+Ep+Ep+q]×[n(Epμ)n(Ep+qμ)]}.

    (7)

    The complex function that appears in the thermodynamic potential can be simplified, as it can be expressed as [40]

    12GΠM(ω+iϵ,q)=[12GΠM(ωiϵ,q)]exp(2iΦM(ω,q)),

    (8)

    ΦM represents the scattering phase shift associated with the quark-antiquark scattering in the interaction channel and it can be divided in two parts

    ΦM=ϕ+ϕM

    (9)

    with

    tanϕ=ImI2(ω+iϵ,q)ReI2(ω+iϵ,q)

    (10)

    and

    tanϕM=ImM2(ω+iϵ,q)(ω2q2ϵ2M+ReM2(ω+iϵ,q)),

    (11)

    where

    M2(ω,q)=12GI12GI2(ω,q),

    (12)

    where ϕM denotes the meson phase shift and ϕ represents the background phase shift. The mass of the meson is extracted from the pole of the meson propagator in Random Phase Approximation at zero momentum, which is given by the following equation [38,40]

    12GReΠπ,σ(mπ,σ,0)=0,

    (13)

    where the real part of Ππ,σ(ω,0) are expressed as [38]

    ReΠπ(ω,0)=2NcNfd3p(2π)3(12np)ωpω2pω2pω2/4,

    (14)

    ReΠσ(ω,0)=2NcNfd3p(2π)3(12np)ωpω2pM2qω2pω2/4.

    (15)

    The mass of the unbound resonance has been considered as the real part of Ππ,σ at zero density. For (ω=mπ,σ<2Mq), the imaginary part of the polarization function is zero; hence, the decay channel into the dressed qˉq pair is closed, and the spectral function gets a bound state contribution expressed by a delta peak in correspondence of the meson mass. For mπ,σ>2Mq, the meson can decay into a constituent quark-antiquark pair. Hence, it is not a stable bound state, but a resonant state. Ππ,σ has an imaginary part, and the meson spectral function receives a contribution from the continuum cut. Then, the pole mass equation can be expressed in the complex form to determine the resonant mass mπ,σ and its associated decay width Γπ,σ from the relationship [40],

    12GΠπ,σ(mπ,σi12Γπ,σ,0)=0

    (16)

    From the imaginary part of M2, we can define the decay width as,

    Γπ,σ=ImM2(mπ,σiϵ,0)mπ,σ,

    (17)

    where [38]

    ImIπ2(ω,0)=θ(ω24M2q)θ(4(Λ2+M2q)ω2)×NcNf16πω214M2qω2[12n(ω/2)],

    (18)

    ImIσ2(ω,0)=θ(ω24M2q)θ(4(Λ2+M2q)ω2)×NcNf16π(ω24M2q)14M2qω2×[12n(ω/2)].

    (19)

    To implement the effect of finite system sizes, proper boundary conditions must be chosen: periodic for bosons and anti-periodic for fermions. In effect, this leads to a sum of infinite extent over discretized momentum values, pi=πniR, where R denotes the dimension of cubical volume and ni are positive integers with i = x, y, z. Negative values of ni are neglected, because they will provide wave-functions identical to the positive ni solutions except for a physically irrelevant sign change. Here, we have done several simplifications: i) We neglect surface and curvature effects. ii) The infinite sum is considered as an integration over a continuous variation of momentum, but with the lower cut-off. iii) We do not adopt any modifications to the mean-field parameters due to finite size effects. Our philosophy had been to maintain the known physics at zero T, zero μ, and infinite volume fixed.

    This implies a lower momentum cut-off pminπR=λ(say). The infinite sum over discrete momentum values is replaced by integration over continuum momentum variation, but with the lower momentum cut-off. Hence, by replacing the lower limit zero by the lower cut-off λ in Eq. (2), Eqs. (14)–(15), and Eqs. (18)–(19), we obtain modified results of constituent quark mass Mq, meson masses mπ,σ, and meson dissociation probabilities γπ,σ, which depend on the volume of the medium along with the temperature of the medium.

    In principle, discrete momentum values should be summed over, but for simplicity, we integrate over continuous values of momentum. This simplified picture of the finite size effect by implementing a lower momentum cut-off is well justified in Refs. [42,43]. It is well demonstrated in Fig. 1 of Ref. [42].

    It is known that π and σ mesons are pseudo-scalar and scalar modes comprising u,d quarks with the same spin quantum no (J=0) but different parity states π=1,+1. Particle physicists generally follow the compact notation of the spin and parity quantum number as Jπ. Hence, we can visualize that π and σ mesons are Jπ=01 and 0+1 quantum states of the same quark composition. They are called chiral partners. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of hadrons, and a non-zero quark condensate is responsible for the mass difference between chiral partners at T=0. Therefore, by increasing the temperature of nuclear or hadronic matter, a phase transition from hadrons to quarks can occur beyond a transition temperature, and the corresponding condensate also melts down. Owing to this transformation from large to nearly zero condensate and breaking to the restoration phase of chiral symmetry, the mass difference between chiral partners disappears. The NJL model (as well as other effective QCD models) can optimally capture these facts, and its mathematical framework has already been addressed in Sec. II.B, while its results will be discussed in Sec. III. In this subsection, we will discuss the drag, diffusion, and conduction of two mesonic modes via dissociations into quarks and anti-quarks. The mathematical anatomy of the dissociation process has already been addressed in Eqs. (18)–(19) and it can be directly connected with drag and then with the diffusion and conduction of chiral partners. Here, we will first devlop the diagrammatic construction of conductivity and diffusion. Then, in the end, we will observe the position of the drag coefficient in the diagrammatic expression of conductivity and diffusion. In real-time thermal field theory, any two point function at finite temperature can always be expressed in a 2×2 matrix structure because the contour in a complex time plane offers four possible sets of two points [44,45]. For a symmetric contour (although there are many other ways to draw it), time evolution starts from to + along a horizontal real-time axis, then it shifts down along the imaginary-time axis by iβ2, and then returns from + to ; finally, it completes its remaining shift by iβ2 along imaginary-time axis, such that its final destination point is iβ. This time evolution along the imaginary-time axis up to iβ is the basic requirement of thermal field theory, where the time evolution operator has to be converted into a density matrix [44,45]. In real time formalism, we have two real-time axes from to + and from + to . Four possible approaches are available to choose two points on these two axes, which can be considered as four components of a 2×2 matrix structure. Realizing the propagator as a two-point function of field operators, if one can proceed for finding thermal propagator in real-time formalism, then a 2×2 matrix structures with four components D11, D12, D21, D22 can be found. Similarly, one-loop self-energy at finite temperature forms a 2×2 matrix structure with four components Π11, Π12, Π21, Π22.

    This matrix can normally be diagonalized in terms of a single element like retarded component ΠRμν(q0,q) or the spectral function ρμν(q0,q) of that mesonic correlator. Starting with 11 components (Π11μν) of the 2×2 matrix, anyone of these quantities can be obtained by adopting their connecting relationship [46,47]:

    ρμν(q0,q)=2ImΠRμν(q0,q)=2tanh(βq02)ImΠ11μν(q0,q).

    (20)

    Using the Wick contraction technique, 11 components of the current-current correlator can be derived as [46,47]

    Π11μν(q0,q)=id4xeiqxTJμ(x)Jν(0)β=id4xeiqxTϕ(x)μϕ(x)ϕ(0)νϕ(0)β=id4k(2π)4Nμν(q,k)D11(k)D11(p=q+k),

    (21)

    where

    D11(k)=1k20ω2k+iϵ+2πinkδ(k20ω2k),

    (22)

    where nk=1/(eβωk1) represents Bose-Einstein (BE) distribution function of meson

    and

    Nμν(q,k)=4kμ(qk)ν.

    (23)

    Eq. (21) can diagrammatically be associated with a one-loop type of self-energy diagram with internal meson lines, as illustrated in Fig. 3(A). Then, from this correlator Π11μν, it is possible to obtain the useful correlators - (1). The density-density correlator is obtained as

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (A) One-loop schematic representation of π or σ meson current-current correlator, whose low frequency limit is connected with its diffusion coefficient or conductivity. (B) Dissociation diagram of π or σ meson to quark and anti-quark.

    ΠR00(q0,q)=id4xeiqx[J0(x),J0(0)]β

    (24)

    (2), while the spatial current-current correlator is defined as

    ΠRij(q0,q)=id4xeiqx[Ji(x),Jj(0)]β.

    (25)

    The spatial current-current correlator can be decomposed into transverse and longitudinal components as

    ΠRij(q0,q)=(qiqjq2δij)ΠRT(q0,q)+qiqjq2ΠRL(q0,q),

    (26)

    where our matter of interest is on the longitudinal component ΠRL(q0,q), which can be extracted from both density-density and (spatial) current-current correlators by using the relationship

    ΠRL(q0,q)=q20q2ΠR00(q0,q)=qiqjq2ΠRij(q0,q).

    (27)

    Hence, we can define a spectral function without Lorentz indices

    ρ=2ΠRL(q0,q).

    (28)

    Using Eq. (22) in Eq. (21) and then using the other Eqs. (20), (28), we obtain the simplified structure in a positive but low q0 region [46,47]

    ρ(q0,q)=2d3k(2π)3(π)N4ωkωp×[q0β{n+k(1n+k)}δ(q0+ωkωp)]=2d3k(2π)3N4ωkωplimγ0[q0β{n+k(1n+k)}γ(q0+ωkωp)2+γ2].

    (29)

    We will consider the finite value of γ in further calculations to obtain non-divergent values of pion (π) and sigma (σ) meson conductivity

    κ=16limq0,q0ρ(q0,q)q0=1γ2β0d3k(2π)313(kωk)2[nk{1+nk}]

    (30)

    where

    χs=2β0d3k(2π)3[nk{1+nk}]

    (31)

    represents static susceptibility and ωk={k2+m2π,σ}1/2. Therefore, by identifying γπ,σ as the drag coefficient of π and σ mesons, one can calculate spatial diffusion constant

    D=κ/χs

    (32)

    Eq. (29) can be approximated as

    κ=1γv2/3χs,

    (33)

    and then using the further approximated relationship v2/3=T/m, based on the non-relativistic equipartition theorem, Einstein relationship can easily be determined

    v2/31γ=Tmπ,σγ=D.

    (34)

    Eqs. (30) to (34) basically represents general connections among the quantities - D, γ, κ, χs. For π and σ mesonic condensates, these quantities can be denoted as Dπ,σ, γπ,σ, κπ,σ, χπ,σs respectively. Similar calculations of the same quantities for heavy quark can be found in Ref. [48].

    Here, we want to obtain drag (γπ,σ), diffusion (Dπ,σ) coefficients, and conductivity (κπ,σ) for π and σ mesons near and beyond Mott temperature, where these mesonic condensates can dissociate in quarks and anti-quarks in the medium via the decay process π/σQ+ˉQ and the mesonic condensates will dissipate through a medium, whose corresponding γπ,σ, Dπ,σ, and κπ,σ we wish to estimate. Here, drag coefficients of π,σ states are estimated via the decay process of πQˉQ and σQˉQ. Hence, we can precisely equate γπ,σ with Eq. (17), which estimates the decay probability of π,σQˉQ from the imaginary part of the mesonic self-energy. These dissociation diagrams are illustrated in Fig. 3(B). After obtaining the drag coefficients γπ,σ, we can calculate Dπ,σ and κπ,σ using Eqs. (30), (32).

    This section will numerically explore the spectral and dissipation properties of chiral partners π and σ mesons at finite temperature and size. Their masses will reveal their spectral properties, while their drag, diffusion, and conductivity will measure their dissipation properties.

    The masses of the π and σ mesons are obtained from Eqs. (13)–(15), and the decay widths can be calculated from Eqs. (17)–(19). Fig. 4 presents the temperature dependence of chiral partners, π and σ mesons, for different system sizes R. In real world (for T=0), their masses are well separated; however, they will be in degenerate states at a high temperature. This fact of merging chiral partners is considered as an alternative signature of chiral symmetry restoration. This transition from chiral symmetry breaking to restoration is observed for both infinite and finite system sizes; however, their merging pattern becomes different. In the beginning, pion mass increases and sigma meson mass decreases with T, then beyond the transition temperature, both increase to be merged. In this context, the reader may find an interesting trend pion mass in Ref. [49], where it can be reduced near the transition temperature. At T=0, the mass of the π meson increases as we decrease the system size, while the mass of σ meson remains unchanged. As the volume decreases, the difference between π and σ mesons also decreases, which indicates that the chiral symmetry effect reduces with decreasing volume. The exact mathematical analysis finite volume effect on Eqs. (14) and (15) might be a challenging job; however, shrinking the thermodynamical phase-space can be considered as the main source of modifications. Results obtained from the increasing pion mass with decreasing volume have also been observed in other frameworks like the chiral perturbation theory [50] and renormalization group methods in the quark-meson model [51]. However, the pion mass generally shoots up after the critical temperature in the infinite volume case, but its blowing trend becomes quite suppressed in the finite volume case. As collective result of increasing the pion mass and suppressing blowing trends after critical temperature, we infer that the masses are suppressed from R= to R=4fm, whereas they are enhanced from R=4fm to R=2fm.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (color online) T dependence of pion (black) and sigma (red) meson masses for R= (solid line), 4 fm (dash-dotted line), 3 fm (dash line), and 2 fm (dotted line).

    Next, in Fig. 5, we have plotted π and σ decay widths in a QˉQ channel for different system sizes. Because the σ meson mass is more significant than two times the quark mass (mσ>2Mq) in the entire temperature range, we will obtain non-zero γσ in the entire T. However, for the case of the π meson mass, the kinematic threshold mπ>2Mq is valid above the Mott temperature TM, below which the πQˉQ decay is forbidden. For R= case, TM=0.201 GeV, and it shows that the solid black line, denoting γπ, is non-zero beyond that temperature. In this study, we have only considered the dissociation diagram of pion. This explains why we obtain this kind of pattern. However, one can obtain a non-zero scattering probability of pion below the Mott temperature TM by considering other possible scattering diagrams. For example, π+ππ+π scattering is possible in higher-order diagrams as addressed in Ref. [52]. Accordingly, this present study is intended to solely consider the dissociation diagram and zoom in on the finite size effect of merging patterns of chiral partners. A merging pattern in the decay width of chiral partners is observed. It is expected that as the kinematic phase-space of two decay probabilities depend on their mass only, their coupling constants are not different, and similar to the NJL model, π and σ meson states are basically considered as condensates of the same quark composition, but with a different spin-parity quantum number Jπ (= 0 and 0+ for π and σ meson respectively). When we consider the finite size effect, we find that the γσ increases in the low T domain. Mott temperature decreases as R decreases, which can be observed from shifting the threshold pion decay width along the T-axis.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (color online) T dependence of pion (black) and sigma (red) meson decay widths through quark-anti-quark channel for different system sizes.

    Fig. 6(a) presents quark masses as a function of T and R. It can be observed that Mq decreases with decreasing system size due to the shrinking of the phase-space integration in gap Eq. (2). Accordingly, due to the term mπ,σ4M2q in Eqs. (18) and (19), the γπ,σ become larger (in low T domain) as the system size decreases. Knowing Mq(T,R) and mπ(T,R), the Mott temperature TM(R) can be determined as a function of R, where mπ2Mq=0. It is plotted in Fig. 6(b), from where we obtain TM(R), which is plotted as a solid red line with circles in Fig. 7. From Fig. 6 it can be observed that the Mott temperature value decreases in a lower system size. The value of the Mott temperature for R=2 fm is quite smaller than the higher volume systems.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (color online) T dependence of (a) Mq and (b) mπ2Mq for different system sized. Straight horizontal red lined, located at mπ2Mq=0, are indicating corresponding Mott temperature TM for different values of R.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (color online) Modification of transition temperature Tc and Mott temperature TM for changing the system size R, where R=10 is approximately considered as infinite volume.

    Fig. 7 represents the variation of the transition temperature and Mott transition temperature with R. The transition temperature can be obtained from the maxima of the first derivative of the chiral condensates for the different finite system sizes. As R increases, both the transition and Mott transition temperatures increase, and after R=4fm, they both attain saturation. The value of the Mott transition temperature is lower than that of the transition temperature below R=3fm. As we increase the system's size, the Mott temperature value starts increasing more than the transition temperature and saturates at a higher value than the transition temperature.

    Using the mπ,σ(T,R) and γπ,σ(T,R) in Eq. (30), we have obtained the conductivity of the pion and sigma κπ,σ(T,R), which is plotted in Fig. 8. Below the Mott temperature, a divergence trend and sharp divergence of κπ(T,R) are observed for infinite and finite system size cases. The source of divergence is the relationship κπ1/γπ. The pion and sigma meson's conductivity changes significantly with the variation of the system size and decreases with the decreasing volume. The conductivity of the pion and sigma meson merges after the transition temperature, which is again decreased as the system size decreases.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  (color online) Conductivity of π (black) and σ (red) mesons or light flavor condensates with quantum numbers Jπ=0 and 0+ for R= (solid line) and 2 fm (dotted line).

    Fig. 9(a) shows the diffusion coefficients of π and σ mesons by using Eq. (32), while Fig. 9(b) shows corresponding results by using the Einstein relationship given in Eq. (34). Furthermore, one can notice the divergence nature of Dπ(T,R) below the Mott temperature and realize the feasible relationship Dπ1/γπ.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  (color online) Diffusion coefficients D of π (black) and σ (red) mesons or light flavor condensates with quantum number Jπ=0 and 0+ for R= (solid line), 3 fm (dash line), and 2 fm (dotted line).

    At the end, if we briefly take a look at all the quantities of chiral partners for infinite (R=) and finite (R=2 fm) sizes of the medium, we can obtain a table, as presented in Table 1. The transition and Mott temperatures for R= and R=2 fm are presented in Table 1, which also includes the temperatures, where the masses (4th column), drag coefficients (2nd column), diffusion coefficients (3rd column), and conductivity (4th column) of π and σ mesons tend to merge. Along with the well-known conventional concepts of transition and Mott temperatures, we have defined the temperatures, beyond which the system forms the doublet of masses, drag coefficients, diffusion coefficients, conductivity. All these temperatures reveal a common fact that their positions shift towards lower values during the transition from infinite to finite system sizes. Similar to chiral condensate melting, forming mass doublets beyond the transition temperature is another demonstration of chiral symmetry restoration. Accordingly, merging other quantities such as drag, diffusion coefficients, and conductivity might also be considered alternative realization chiral symmetry restoration. In fact, collecting all quantities provides a deep understanding of the different thermodynamical properties of chiral partners and transition details from breaking to restore the phase of chiral symmetry. The transition point with respect to the drag, diffusion coefficients, and conductivity will also shifts in a lower temperature when one goes from infinite to finite size matter.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Transition (2nd column) and Mott (3rd column) temperatures, where masses (4th column), drag coefficients (2nd column), diffusion coefficients (3rd column), and conductivity (4th column) of chiral partners are merged for R= (2nd and 5th rows) and R=2 fm (3rd and 6th rows), temperatures are in MeV.
    Size Transition Temperature Mott Temperature Mass Doublet
    R= 184 200 245
    R=2 fm 166 153 223
    Size Drag Doublet Diffusion Doublet Conductivity Doublet
    R= 234 245 236
    R=2 fm 188 195 212
    DownLoad: CSV
    Show Table

    At the end, the reader should accept the quantitative limitations of the present simplified approach, where integration with lower momentum cut-off λ is considered in place of a quantized momentum sum. For a small system with R=2 fm, the phase space becomes significantly smaller due to larger values of lower momentum cut-off λ. We observed significant changes in different quantities due to this phase-space shrinking at R=2 fm. For this significantly smaller-size case, in principle, we should use quantized momentum sum instead of integration because of larger energy level steps. Again, in place of cubical size, considering the exact cylindrical size of RHIC or LHC matter might be a more realistic problem for phenomenological purposes. All these realistic complicated pictures are not covered in this present study, but will certainly be interesting future research problems.

    We studied the finite volume effect on the spectral functions of strongly interacting matter at zero chemical potential. We presented the pion and sigma meson masses and decay widths at different finite system sizes. In addition, we calculated the conductivity and diffusion coefficients of pion and sigma mesons. All these quantities exhibit significant variations with the finite system size.

    At low temperatures, the chiral symmetry is broken, and after the transition temperature, the chiral symmetry is restored. The transition from the chiral symmetry broken phase to the chiral symmetry restored phase can be visualized in both the infinite and finite volume systems. Based on the quark condensate or quark mass melting, we can define a chiral transition temperature, which shifts to lower values when we go from infinite to finite size matter. An alternative chiral symmetry restoration can be realized from the merging of π and σ masses near and after the transition temperature. This merging point also shifts towards lower temperature due to finite size consideration.

    We have shown the decay widths of the pion and sigma meson masses with different system sizes. Decay widths are estimated from the imaginary part of self-energy for pion and sigma meson, which interpret the thermodynamical probabilities of their dissociation to quark and anti-quark channels. For the sigma meson, the decay width is observed for the entire temperature range. However, for the pion, the decay width begins after the Mott transition temperature, which also decreases with decreasing system size. Similar to masses of the chiral partners, their decay widths also merge in the temperature domain of the restored phase. Again, the finite size consideration makes their merging points shift towards lower temperature values. For the finite size effect, we find that the decay width of the σ meson is enhanced in the low T domain, which is a quite interesting and new outcome.

    Considering the dissociation process as the dragging mechanism of π and σ modes with a medium, we estimated their diffusion coefficients and conductivities. Low temperature π mode diffusion or conduction diverges because of the vanishing drag process below the Mott temperature; however, its non-divergent values beyond Mott temperature are merged later with corresponding quantities of σ. Similar to merging the masses and decay widths of chiral partners, their merging of diffusion and conduction values can be considered as an alternative realization of the restored phase, and again, their merging points shift towards the low-temperature direction when the size of the matter is reduced.

    The finite size effect of quark and hadronic matter, explored in this study, can be connected with RHIC or LHC phenomenology. Here, we have found mass reductions of a constituent quark and pion; however, the mass of the sigma meson remains approximately the same in the low-temperature zone. These changes modify the kinematic phase-space part of meson to quark-antiquark dissociation, as well as the diffusion probabilities of mesons. This finite size effect of the NJL model's phase-space structure can be implemented in other quantities connected with RHIC or LHC phenomenology. For example, in the exploration of the finite size effect on dilepton production, heavy mesons suppression, for which a systematic detail evolution picture has to be adopted. In a finite size system, there is the possibility of a coordinate-dependent condensate, which would be the research topic of a future study.

    [1] D. H. Boal, C.-K. Gelbke, and B. K. Jennings, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 553 (1990) doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.553
    [2] M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 357 (2005) doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151533
    [3] L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. C 96, 044904 (2017) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904
    [4] D. Adamova et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 022301 (2003) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.022301
    [5] G. Graef, M. Bleicher, and Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044901 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044901
    [6] S. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255 (1998) doi: 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1
    [7] H. T. Elze and W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B 179, 385 (1986) doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90498-3
    [8] J. Braun, B. Klein, and B. -J. Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B 713, 216 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.053
    [9] J. Braun, B. Klein, and P. Piasecki, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1576 (2011) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1576-7
    [10] J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014032 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0408116[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014032
    [11] J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034017 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504127[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034017
    [12] J. Braun, B. Klein, H. J. Pirner et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 074010 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512274[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.074010
    [13] L. F. Palhares, E. S. Fraga, and T. Kodama, J. Phys. G 38, 085101 (2011), arXiv:0904.4830[nucl-th doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/38/8/085101
    [14] R.-A. Tripolt, J. Braun, B. Klein et al., Phys. Rev. D 90, 054012 (2014) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.054012
    [15] O. Kiriyama and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 67, 085010 (2003) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.085010
    [16] L. M. Abreu, M. Gomes, and A. J. da Silva, Phys. Lett. B 642, 551 (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.10.015
    [17] D. Ebert and K. G. Klimenko, Phys. Rev. D 82, 025018 (2010) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.025018
    [18] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malbouisson et al., Nucl. Phys. B 819, 127 (2009), arXiv:0909.5105[hep-th doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.04.012
    [19] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, and J. M. C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 83, 025001 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.025001
    [20] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, and J. M. C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065036 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.065036
    [21] Z. Ya-Peng, Y. Pei-Lin, Y. Zhen-Hua et al., Nucl. Phys. B 952, 114919 (2020), arXiv:1812.09665[hep-ph doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114919
    [22] L.M. Abreu, C. A. Linhares, and A. P.C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 99, 076001 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.076001
    [23] A. Bhattacharyya, P. Deb, S. K. Ghosh et al., Phys. Rev. D 87(5), 054009 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.054009
    [24] A. Bhattacharyya, R. Ray, and S. Sur, Phys. Rev. D 91, 051501 (2015) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.051501
    [25] A. Bhattacharyya, S. K. Ghosh, R. Ray et al., EPL 116, 52001 (2016), arXiv:1507.08795[hep-ph doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/116/52001
    [26] K. Saha, S. Ghosh, S. Upadhaya et al., Phys. Rev. D 97, 116020 (2018), arXiv:1711.10169[nucl-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.116020
    [27] N. Magdy, M. Csanad, and R. A. Lacey, J. Phys. G 97, 025101 (2017), arXiv:1510.04380[nucl-th
    [28] C. Spieles, H. Stoecker, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 57, 908 (1998) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.908
    [29] A. Bhattacharyya, R. Ray, S. Samanta et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 041901 (2015), arXiv:1502.00889[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.041901
    [30] H.-j. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 765, 188 (2017), arXiv:1612.06485[nucl-th doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.015
    [31] S. Samanta, S. Ghosh, and B. Mohanty, J. Phys. G 45, 075101 (2018), arXiv:1706.07709[hep-ph doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aac621
    [32] S. Ghosh, S. Samanta, S. Ghosh et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28, 1950036 (2019)
    [33] S. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, and S. Bhattacharyya, Phys. Rev. C 98, 045202 (2018)
    [34] N. Sarkar, P. Deb, and P. Ghosh, Finite size effect on thermodynamics of hadron gas in high-multiplicity events of proton-proton collisions at the LHC, arXiv: 1905.06532[hep-ph]
    [35] L. M. Abreu and E. S. Nery, Phys. Rev. C 96, 055204 (2017), arXiv:1711.07934[nucl-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.055204
    [36] T. Ishikawa, K. Nakayama, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054010 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.054010
    [37] T. Hatsua and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994) doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(94)90022-1
    [38] H. Hansen, W. M. Alberico, A. Beraudo et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 065004 (2007) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.065004
    [39] P. Deb, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Datta et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 055208 (2009) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.055208
    [40] P. Zhuang, J. Hufner, and S. P. Klevansky, Nucl. Phys. A 576, 525-552 (1994) doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90743-9
    [41] M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005)
    [42] K. Redlich and K. Zalewski, Finite volume corrections and low momentum cuts in the thermodynamics of quantum gases, arXiv: 1611.03746[nucl-th]
    [43] F. Karsch, K. Morita, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034907 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034907
    [44] M.Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, (Publisher : Cambridge University Press, UK, 1996), Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511721700
    [45] S. Mallick and S. Sarkar, Hadrons at Finite Temperature, (Publisher : Cambridge University Press, UK, 2016), Doi: 10.1017/9781316535585
    [46] S. Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450054 (2014) doi: 10.1142/S0217751X14500547
    [47] S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 95, 3, 036018 (2017)
    [48] P. Petreczky and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014508 (2006)
    [49] D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 202302 (2002) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.202302
    [50] G. Colangelo and S. Durr, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 543 (2004) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s2004-01593-y
    [51] B. Klein, Few-Body Syst. 53, 45 (2012) doi: 10.1007/s00601-012-0305-6
    [52] K. Heckmann, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 142 (2012), arXiv:1202.0724[hep-ph
  • [1] D. H. Boal, C.-K. Gelbke, and B. K. Jennings, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 553 (1990) doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.553
    [2] M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 357 (2005) doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151533
    [3] L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. C 96, 044904 (2017) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904
    [4] D. Adamova et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 022301 (2003) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.022301
    [5] G. Graef, M. Bleicher, and Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044901 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044901
    [6] S. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255 (1998) doi: 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1
    [7] H. T. Elze and W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B 179, 385 (1986) doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90498-3
    [8] J. Braun, B. Klein, and B. -J. Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B 713, 216 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.053
    [9] J. Braun, B. Klein, and P. Piasecki, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1576 (2011) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1576-7
    [10] J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014032 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0408116[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014032
    [11] J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034017 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504127[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034017
    [12] J. Braun, B. Klein, H. J. Pirner et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 074010 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512274[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.074010
    [13] L. F. Palhares, E. S. Fraga, and T. Kodama, J. Phys. G 38, 085101 (2011), arXiv:0904.4830[nucl-th doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/38/8/085101
    [14] R.-A. Tripolt, J. Braun, B. Klein et al., Phys. Rev. D 90, 054012 (2014) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.054012
    [15] O. Kiriyama and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 67, 085010 (2003) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.085010
    [16] L. M. Abreu, M. Gomes, and A. J. da Silva, Phys. Lett. B 642, 551 (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.10.015
    [17] D. Ebert and K. G. Klimenko, Phys. Rev. D 82, 025018 (2010) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.025018
    [18] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malbouisson et al., Nucl. Phys. B 819, 127 (2009), arXiv:0909.5105[hep-th doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.04.012
    [19] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, and J. M. C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 83, 025001 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.025001
    [20] L. M. Abreu, A. P. C. Malbouisson, and J. M. C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065036 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.065036
    [21] Z. Ya-Peng, Y. Pei-Lin, Y. Zhen-Hua et al., Nucl. Phys. B 952, 114919 (2020), arXiv:1812.09665[hep-ph doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114919
    [22] L.M. Abreu, C. A. Linhares, and A. P.C. Malbouisson, Phys. Rev. D 99, 076001 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.076001
    [23] A. Bhattacharyya, P. Deb, S. K. Ghosh et al., Phys. Rev. D 87(5), 054009 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.054009
    [24] A. Bhattacharyya, R. Ray, and S. Sur, Phys. Rev. D 91, 051501 (2015) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.051501
    [25] A. Bhattacharyya, S. K. Ghosh, R. Ray et al., EPL 116, 52001 (2016), arXiv:1507.08795[hep-ph doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/116/52001
    [26] K. Saha, S. Ghosh, S. Upadhaya et al., Phys. Rev. D 97, 116020 (2018), arXiv:1711.10169[nucl-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.116020
    [27] N. Magdy, M. Csanad, and R. A. Lacey, J. Phys. G 97, 025101 (2017), arXiv:1510.04380[nucl-th
    [28] C. Spieles, H. Stoecker, and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 57, 908 (1998) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.908
    [29] A. Bhattacharyya, R. Ray, S. Samanta et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 041901 (2015), arXiv:1502.00889[hep-ph doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.041901
    [30] H.-j. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 765, 188 (2017), arXiv:1612.06485[nucl-th doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.015
    [31] S. Samanta, S. Ghosh, and B. Mohanty, J. Phys. G 45, 075101 (2018), arXiv:1706.07709[hep-ph doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aac621
    [32] S. Ghosh, S. Samanta, S. Ghosh et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28, 1950036 (2019)
    [33] S. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, and S. Bhattacharyya, Phys. Rev. C 98, 045202 (2018)
    [34] N. Sarkar, P. Deb, and P. Ghosh, Finite size effect on thermodynamics of hadron gas in high-multiplicity events of proton-proton collisions at the LHC, arXiv: 1905.06532[hep-ph]
    [35] L. M. Abreu and E. S. Nery, Phys. Rev. C 96, 055204 (2017), arXiv:1711.07934[nucl-th doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.055204
    [36] T. Ishikawa, K. Nakayama, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054010 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.054010
    [37] T. Hatsua and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994) doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(94)90022-1
    [38] H. Hansen, W. M. Alberico, A. Beraudo et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 065004 (2007) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.065004
    [39] P. Deb, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Datta et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 055208 (2009) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.055208
    [40] P. Zhuang, J. Hufner, and S. P. Klevansky, Nucl. Phys. A 576, 525-552 (1994) doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90743-9
    [41] M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005)
    [42] K. Redlich and K. Zalewski, Finite volume corrections and low momentum cuts in the thermodynamics of quantum gases, arXiv: 1611.03746[nucl-th]
    [43] F. Karsch, K. Morita, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034907 (2016) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034907
    [44] M.Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, (Publisher : Cambridge University Press, UK, 1996), Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511721700
    [45] S. Mallick and S. Sarkar, Hadrons at Finite Temperature, (Publisher : Cambridge University Press, UK, 2016), Doi: 10.1017/9781316535585
    [46] S. Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450054 (2014) doi: 10.1142/S0217751X14500547
    [47] S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 95, 3, 036018 (2017)
    [48] P. Petreczky and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014508 (2006)
    [49] D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 202302 (2002) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.202302
    [50] G. Colangelo and S. Durr, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 543 (2004) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s2004-01593-y
    [51] B. Klein, Few-Body Syst. 53, 45 (2012) doi: 10.1007/s00601-012-0305-6
    [52] K. Heckmann, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 142 (2012), arXiv:1202.0724[hep-ph
  • 加载中

Cited by

1. Wang, J., Chen, B., Liu, Y. Finite Size Effect on Gluon Dissociation of J/ψ in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2024, 41(10): 102501. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/41/10/102501
2. Wang, Q.-W., Guo, H.-Z. Temperature and volume dependence of pion-pion scattering lengths[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(2): 023102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad123f
3. Zhang, H.-X., Xiao, Y.-X., Kang, J.-W. et al. Phenomenological study of the anisotropic quark matter in the two-flavor Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022, 33(11): 150. doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01129-4

Figures(9) / Tables(1)

Get Citation
Paramita Deb, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Jai Prakash, Santosh Kumar Das and Raghava Varma. Finite size effect on Dissociation and Diffusion of chiral partners in Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac3def
Paramita Deb, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Jai Prakash, Santosh Kumar Das and Raghava Varma. Finite size effect on Dissociation and Diffusion of chiral partners in Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac3def shu
Milestone
Received: 2021-05-11
Article Metric

Article Views(1494)
PDF Downloads(37)
Cited by(3)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Finite size effect on dissociation and diffusion of chiral partners in Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model

  • 1. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai- 400076, India
  • 2. Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai, GEC Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur- 492015, Chhattisgarh, India
  • 3. School of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Goa, Ponda- 403401, Goa, India

Abstract: The masses of pion and sigma meson modes, along with their dissociation in the quark medium, provide detailed spectral structures of the chiral partners. Collectivity has been observed in pA and pp systems both at LHC and RHIC. In this research, we studied the restoration of chiral symmetry by investigating the finite size effect on the detailed structure of chiral partners in the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. Their diffusion and conduction have been studied using this dissociation mechanism. It is determined that the masses, widths, diffusion coefficients, and conductivities of chiral partners merge at different temperatures in the restoration phase of chiral symmetry. However, merging points are shifted to lower temperatures when finite size effect is introduced into the picture. The strengths of diffusions and conductions are also reduced once the finite size is introduced in the calculations.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • The nuclear matter formed in heavy-ion collision experiments, such as those in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC), has a finite volume and lifetime in fm and fm/c scale, respectively. Initially, a hot quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is expected to be formed, which then expands, and after a particular time, the medium freezes out with a specific volume. Experimentally, this freeze-out volume can be measured via the Hanbury-Brown-Twiss (HBT) methodology, whose details can be found in review articles [1,2] and references therein. The freeze-out volume of the matter depends on the size of the colliding nuclei, center-of-mass energy, and collision centrality [3]. A freeze-out volume in the range of 2000–3000 fm3 is presented for a large range of center-of-mass energies s in Ref. [4], while the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics calculations predict a volume range of 50–250 fm3 [5,6]. Hence, it becomes crucial to understand the finite size effect on different phenomenological quantities within the uncertainties in the volume of the strongly interacting matter created at RHIC or LHC.

      The effects of finite volume have been addressed in several models such as the non-interacting bag model [7], quark-meson (QM) model Refs. [8-14], Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model [15-22], Polyakov loop extended NJL (PNJL) [23-26], Polyakov loop extended linear sigma model (PLSM) [27], hadron resonance gas (HRG) [28-34], and Walecka model [35,36]. All of the model calculations invariably infer that the quark-hadron phase diagram depends on the volume of the matter formed in these collisions. Among the NJL and PNJL model studies [15-26] on finite size effect, only Ref. [21] has studied the effect of finite size on meson masses. However, a detailed investigation of their dissociation probability, along with their masses in the quark medium, would provide a complete picture. As a first step and for the first time, we investigate the spectral and dissipation properties of the lightest chiral partners, namely, the π and σ mesons.

      The remainder of this article is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we present the formalism part, which has two subsections. In Sec. II.A, the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the finite size is introduced. In Sec. II.B, the framework of diffusion and conductivity is constructed for mesonic modes. After addressing the formalism part, we explore the numerical results of masses, decay widths, diffusion coefficients, conductivities of the mesonic modes, and their finite size effect in Sec. III. Finally, we summarize our investigation in Sec. IV.

    II.   FORMALISM

      A.   NJL model framework and finite volume

    • We consider the framework of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model [37,38], through which we can obtain temperature-dependent quark and meson masses from hadronic to quark temperature domains, within which a crossover type phase transition can be developed as predicted by lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) calculations.

      We adopt a two-flavor model with a degenerate mass for u and d quarks. The Lagrangian density (for any quark flavor) can be expressed as

      L=ˉqγμiμqmqˉqq+G[(ˉqq)2+(ˉqiγ5τaq)2],

      (1)

      where flavor summation is not explicitly shown and mq denotes the bare quark mass. The τa are Pauli matrices acting in flavor space. Owing to the dynamical breaking of chiral symmetry in the NJL model, the chiral condensate Σˉqq acquires a non-zero vacuum expectation value. The constituent mass at the zero quark chemical potential and temperature can be obtained from the gap equation,

      Mq=mq2GΣ=mq+4NfNcGd3p(2π)3MqEp[12np],

      (2)

      where np=1/(eβEp+1) represents the Fermi-Dirac (FD) distribution of quark with energy Ep=p2+M2q, zero quark chemical potential, and temperature T=1/β. Here, the flavor degeneracy factor Nf=2 and color degeneracy factor Nc=3 are considered, while mq and Mq are current and constituent quark masses, respectively. The temperature-independent part of the integral of Eq. (2) is ultraviolet divergent, while the temperature-dependent part, which contains the Fermi-Dirac distribution function np is finite. We use an ultraviolet cutoff Λ to regularize the divergent integral while the T-dependent integral is integrated without a cutoff. By tuning different fitted parameters [39] Λ=651 MeV, mq=5.5 MeV, and GΛ2=2.1, we obtain feasible values for the quark condensate Σ(T=0)=2(251 MeV)3 [40], pion leptonic decay constant (92.3 MeV), and pion mass (mπ=139.5 MeV) in a vacuum. The diagrammatic representation of Eq. (2) is presented in Fig. 1. In the mean-field approximation, the thermodynamic potential Ω can be obtained as

      Figure 1.  Diagrammatic representation of Eq. (2), which establishes the connection between dressed quark (double solid line) with constituent mass Mf and bare quark (single solid line) with current quark mass mf.

      Ω=2NcNfd3p(2π)3p2+M22NcNfTd3p(2π)3(ln(1+exp((Eμ)T))+ln(1+exp((E+μ)T)))+(Mm)24G

      (3)

      where each term bears its usual significance, which can be found in [39,40].

      Next, to study mesonic states as a quark condensate, the conventional step is to iterate the four-point vertex as presented in Fig. 2, which interprets that infinite series of quark-anti-quark loops are equivalent to a meson propagator [37,38,40,41]. The mesonic polarization function Ππ,σ is given as

      Figure 2.  Diagrammatic representation of the transformation of a quark-quark interaction into an effective π, σ meson propagators (double dash line).

      ΠM,Mπ,σ(ω,q)=λd4p(2π)4Tr(γMS(p+q)γMS(q))

      (4)

      where S(p) denotes the Hartree quark propagator. γM refers to the scalar or pseudoscalar interaction vertex and the index M denotes the scalar or pseudoscalar interaction channel. The polarization function can be expressed as [40]

      ΠM,M=I1(ω2q2ϵ2M,M)I2(ω,q)

      (5)

      where

      I1=NcNfλd3p(2π)31Ep[tanhβ(Ep+μ)2+tanhβ(Epμ)2]

      (6)

      and the function I2(ω,q) given as

      I2(ω,q)=NcNfλd3p(2π)312EpE(p+q)×{1ω+EpEp+q[n(Epμ)n(Ep+qμ)+n(Ep+qμ)n(Epμ)]+[1ωEpEp+q1ω+Ep+Ep+q]×[n(Epμ)n(Ep+qμ)]}.

      (7)

      The complex function that appears in the thermodynamic potential can be simplified, as it can be expressed as [40]

      12GΠM(ω+iϵ,q)=[12GΠM(ωiϵ,q)]exp(2iΦM(ω,q)),

      (8)

      ΦM represents the scattering phase shift associated with the quark-antiquark scattering in the interaction channel and it can be divided in two parts

      ΦM=ϕ+ϕM

      (9)

      with

      tanϕ=ImI2(ω+iϵ,q)ReI2(ω+iϵ,q)

      (10)

      and

      tanϕM=ImM2(ω+iϵ,q)(ω2q2ϵ2M+ReM2(ω+iϵ,q)),

      (11)

      where

      M2(ω,q)=12GI12GI2(ω,q),

      (12)

      where ϕM denotes the meson phase shift and ϕ represents the background phase shift. The mass of the meson is extracted from the pole of the meson propagator in Random Phase Approximation at zero momentum, which is given by the following equation [38,40]

      12GReΠπ,σ(mπ,σ,0)=0,

      (13)

      where the real part of Ππ,σ(ω,0) are expressed as [38]

      ReΠπ(ω,0)=2NcNfd3p(2π)3(12np)ωpω2pω2pω2/4,

      (14)

      ReΠσ(ω,0)=2NcNfd3p(2π)3(12np)ωpω2pM2qω2pω2/4.

      (15)

      The mass of the unbound resonance has been considered as the real part of Ππ,σ at zero density. For (ω=mπ,σ<2Mq), the imaginary part of the polarization function is zero; hence, the decay channel into the dressed qˉq pair is closed, and the spectral function gets a bound state contribution expressed by a delta peak in correspondence of the meson mass. For mπ,σ>2Mq, the meson can decay into a constituent quark-antiquark pair. Hence, it is not a stable bound state, but a resonant state. Ππ,σ has an imaginary part, and the meson spectral function receives a contribution from the continuum cut. Then, the pole mass equation can be expressed in the complex form to determine the resonant mass mπ,σ and its associated decay width Γπ,σ from the relationship [40],

      12GΠπ,σ(mπ,σi12Γπ,σ,0)=0

      (16)

      From the imaginary part of M2, we can define the decay width as,

      Γπ,σ=ImM2(mπ,σiϵ,0)mπ,σ,

      (17)

      where [38]

      ImIπ2(ω,0)=θ(ω24M2q)θ(4(Λ2+M2q)ω2)×NcNf16πω214M2qω2[12n(ω/2)],

      (18)

      ImIσ2(ω,0)=θ(ω24M2q)θ(4(Λ2+M2q)ω2)×NcNf16π(ω24M2q)14M2qω2×[12n(ω/2)].

      (19)

      To implement the effect of finite system sizes, proper boundary conditions must be chosen: periodic for bosons and anti-periodic for fermions. In effect, this leads to a sum of infinite extent over discretized momentum values, pi=πniR, where R denotes the dimension of cubical volume and ni are positive integers with i = x, y, z. Negative values of ni are neglected, because they will provide wave-functions identical to the positive ni solutions except for a physically irrelevant sign change. Here, we have done several simplifications: i) We neglect surface and curvature effects. ii) The infinite sum is considered as an integration over a continuous variation of momentum, but with the lower cut-off. iii) We do not adopt any modifications to the mean-field parameters due to finite size effects. Our philosophy had been to maintain the known physics at zero T, zero μ, and infinite volume fixed.

      This implies a lower momentum cut-off pminπR=λ(say). The infinite sum over discrete momentum values is replaced by integration over continuum momentum variation, but with the lower momentum cut-off. Hence, by replacing the lower limit zero by the lower cut-off λ in Eq. (2), Eqs. (14)–(15), and Eqs. (18)–(19), we obtain modified results of constituent quark mass Mq, meson masses mπ,σ, and meson dissociation probabilities γπ,σ, which depend on the volume of the medium along with the temperature of the medium.

      In principle, discrete momentum values should be summed over, but for simplicity, we integrate over continuous values of momentum. This simplified picture of the finite size effect by implementing a lower momentum cut-off is well justified in Refs. [42,43]. It is well demonstrated in Fig. 1 of Ref. [42].

    • B.   Diffusion of chiral partners

    • It is known that π and σ mesons are pseudo-scalar and scalar modes comprising u,d quarks with the same spin quantum no (J=0) but different parity states π=1,+1. Particle physicists generally follow the compact notation of the spin and parity quantum number as Jπ. Hence, we can visualize that π and σ mesons are Jπ=01 and 0+1 quantum states of the same quark composition. They are called chiral partners. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of hadrons, and a non-zero quark condensate is responsible for the mass difference between chiral partners at T=0. Therefore, by increasing the temperature of nuclear or hadronic matter, a phase transition from hadrons to quarks can occur beyond a transition temperature, and the corresponding condensate also melts down. Owing to this transformation from large to nearly zero condensate and breaking to the restoration phase of chiral symmetry, the mass difference between chiral partners disappears. The NJL model (as well as other effective QCD models) can optimally capture these facts, and its mathematical framework has already been addressed in Sec. II.B, while its results will be discussed in Sec. III. In this subsection, we will discuss the drag, diffusion, and conduction of two mesonic modes via dissociations into quarks and anti-quarks. The mathematical anatomy of the dissociation process has already been addressed in Eqs. (18)–(19) and it can be directly connected with drag and then with the diffusion and conduction of chiral partners. Here, we will first devlop the diagrammatic construction of conductivity and diffusion. Then, in the end, we will observe the position of the drag coefficient in the diagrammatic expression of conductivity and diffusion. In real-time thermal field theory, any two point function at finite temperature can always be expressed in a 2×2 matrix structure because the contour in a complex time plane offers four possible sets of two points [44,45]. For a symmetric contour (although there are many other ways to draw it), time evolution starts from to + along a horizontal real-time axis, then it shifts down along the imaginary-time axis by iβ2, and then returns from + to ; finally, it completes its remaining shift by iβ2 along imaginary-time axis, such that its final destination point is iβ. This time evolution along the imaginary-time axis up to iβ is the basic requirement of thermal field theory, where the time evolution operator has to be converted into a density matrix [44,45]. In real time formalism, we have two real-time axes from to + and from + to . Four possible approaches are available to choose two points on these two axes, which can be considered as four components of a 2×2 matrix structure. Realizing the propagator as a two-point function of field operators, if one can proceed for finding thermal propagator in real-time formalism, then a 2×2 matrix structures with four components D11, D12, D21, D22 can be found. Similarly, one-loop self-energy at finite temperature forms a 2×2 matrix structure with four components Π11, Π12, Π21, Π22.

      This matrix can normally be diagonalized in terms of a single element like retarded component ΠRμν(q0,q) or the spectral function ρμν(q0,q) of that mesonic correlator. Starting with 11 components (Π11μν) of the 2×2 matrix, anyone of these quantities can be obtained by adopting their connecting relationship [46,47]:

      ρμν(q0,q)=2ImΠRμν(q0,q)=2tanh(βq02)ImΠ11μν(q0,q).

      (20)

      Using the Wick contraction technique, 11 components of the current-current correlator can be derived as [46,47]

      Π11μν(q0,q)=id4xeiqxTJμ(x)Jν(0)β=id4xeiqxTϕ(x)μϕ(x)ϕ(0)νϕ(0)β=id4k(2π)4Nμν(q,k)D11(k)D11(p=q+k),

      (21)

      where

      D11(k)=1k20ω2k+iϵ+2πinkδ(k20ω2k),

      (22)

      where nk=1/(eβωk1) represents Bose-Einstein (BE) distribution function of meson

      and

      Nμν(q,k)=4kμ(qk)ν.

      (23)

      Eq. (21) can diagrammatically be associated with a one-loop type of self-energy diagram with internal meson lines, as illustrated in Fig. 3(A). Then, from this correlator Π11μν, it is possible to obtain the useful correlators - (1). The density-density correlator is obtained as

      Figure 3.  (A) One-loop schematic representation of π or σ meson current-current correlator, whose low frequency limit is connected with its diffusion coefficient or conductivity. (B) Dissociation diagram of π or σ meson to quark and anti-quark.

      ΠR00(q0,q)=id4xeiqx[J0(x),J0(0)]β

      (24)

      (2), while the spatial current-current correlator is defined as

      ΠRij(q0,q)=id4xeiqx[Ji(x),Jj(0)]β.

      (25)

      The spatial current-current correlator can be decomposed into transverse and longitudinal components as

      ΠRij(q0,q)=(qiqjq2δij)ΠRT(q0,q)+qiqjq2ΠRL(q0,q),

      (26)

      where our matter of interest is on the longitudinal component ΠRL(q0,q), which can be extracted from both density-density and (spatial) current-current correlators by using the relationship

      ΠRL(q0,q)=q20q2ΠR00(q0,q)=qiqjq2ΠRij(q0,q).

      (27)

      Hence, we can define a spectral function without Lorentz indices

      ρ=2ΠRL(q0,q).

      (28)

      Using Eq. (22) in Eq. (21) and then using the other Eqs. (20), (28), we obtain the simplified structure in a positive but low q0 region [46,47]

      ρ(q0,q)=2d3k(2π)3(π)N4ωkωp×[q0β{n+k(1n+k)}δ(q0+ωkωp)]=2d3k(2π)3N4ωkωplimγ0[q0β{n+k(1n+k)}γ(q0+ωkωp)2+γ2].

      (29)

      We will consider the finite value of γ in further calculations to obtain non-divergent values of pion (π) and sigma (σ) meson conductivity

      κ=16limq0,q0ρ(q0,q)q0=1γ2β0d3k(2π)313(kωk)2[nk{1+nk}]

      (30)

      where

      χs=2β0d3k(2π)3[nk{1+nk}]

      (31)

      represents static susceptibility and ωk={k2+m2π,σ}1/2. Therefore, by identifying γπ,σ as the drag coefficient of π and σ mesons, one can calculate spatial diffusion constant

      D=κ/χs

      (32)

      Eq. (29) can be approximated as

      κ=1γv2/3χs,

      (33)

      and then using the further approximated relationship v2/3=T/m, based on the non-relativistic equipartition theorem, Einstein relationship can easily be determined

      v2/31γ=Tmπ,σγ=D.

      (34)

      Eqs. (30) to (34) basically represents general connections among the quantities - D, γ, κ, χs. For π and σ mesonic condensates, these quantities can be denoted as Dπ,σ, γπ,σ, κπ,σ, χπ,σs respectively. Similar calculations of the same quantities for heavy quark can be found in Ref. [48].

      Here, we want to obtain drag (γπ,σ), diffusion (Dπ,σ) coefficients, and conductivity (κπ,σ) for π and σ mesons near and beyond Mott temperature, where these mesonic condensates can dissociate in quarks and anti-quarks in the medium via the decay process π/σQ+ˉQ and the mesonic condensates will dissipate through a medium, whose corresponding γπ,σ, Dπ,σ, and κπ,σ we wish to estimate. Here, drag coefficients of π,σ states are estimated via the decay process of πQˉQ and σQˉQ. Hence, we can precisely equate γπ,σ with Eq. (17), which estimates the decay probability of π,σQˉQ from the imaginary part of the mesonic self-energy. These dissociation diagrams are illustrated in Fig. 3(B). After obtaining the drag coefficients γπ,σ, we can calculate Dπ,σ and κπ,σ using Eqs. (30), (32).

    III.   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • This section will numerically explore the spectral and dissipation properties of chiral partners π and σ mesons at finite temperature and size. Their masses will reveal their spectral properties, while their drag, diffusion, and conductivity will measure their dissipation properties.

      The masses of the π and σ mesons are obtained from Eqs. (13)–(15), and the decay widths can be calculated from Eqs. (17)–(19). Fig. 4 presents the temperature dependence of chiral partners, π and σ mesons, for different system sizes R. In real world (for T=0), their masses are well separated; however, they will be in degenerate states at a high temperature. This fact of merging chiral partners is considered as an alternative signature of chiral symmetry restoration. This transition from chiral symmetry breaking to restoration is observed for both infinite and finite system sizes; however, their merging pattern becomes different. In the beginning, pion mass increases and sigma meson mass decreases with T, then beyond the transition temperature, both increase to be merged. In this context, the reader may find an interesting trend pion mass in Ref. [49], where it can be reduced near the transition temperature. At T=0, the mass of the π meson increases as we decrease the system size, while the mass of σ meson remains unchanged. As the volume decreases, the difference between π and σ mesons also decreases, which indicates that the chiral symmetry effect reduces with decreasing volume. The exact mathematical analysis finite volume effect on Eqs. (14) and (15) might be a challenging job; however, shrinking the thermodynamical phase-space can be considered as the main source of modifications. Results obtained from the increasing pion mass with decreasing volume have also been observed in other frameworks like the chiral perturbation theory [50] and renormalization group methods in the quark-meson model [51]. However, the pion mass generally shoots up after the critical temperature in the infinite volume case, but its blowing trend becomes quite suppressed in the finite volume case. As collective result of increasing the pion mass and suppressing blowing trends after critical temperature, we infer that the masses are suppressed from R= to R=4fm, whereas they are enhanced from R=4fm to R=2fm.

      Figure 4.  (color online) T dependence of pion (black) and sigma (red) meson masses for R= (solid line), 4 fm (dash-dotted line), 3 fm (dash line), and 2 fm (dotted line).

      Next, in Fig. 5, we have plotted π and σ decay widths in a QˉQ channel for different system sizes. Because the σ meson mass is more significant than two times the quark mass (mσ>2Mq) in the entire temperature range, we will obtain non-zero γσ in the entire T. However, for the case of the π meson mass, the kinematic threshold mπ>2Mq is valid above the Mott temperature TM, below which the πQˉQ decay is forbidden. For R= case, TM=0.201 GeV, and it shows that the solid black line, denoting γπ, is non-zero beyond that temperature. In this study, we have only considered the dissociation diagram of pion. This explains why we obtain this kind of pattern. However, one can obtain a non-zero scattering probability of pion below the Mott temperature TM by considering other possible scattering diagrams. For example, π+ππ+π scattering is possible in higher-order diagrams as addressed in Ref. [52]. Accordingly, this present study is intended to solely consider the dissociation diagram and zoom in on the finite size effect of merging patterns of chiral partners. A merging pattern in the decay width of chiral partners is observed. It is expected that as the kinematic phase-space of two decay probabilities depend on their mass only, their coupling constants are not different, and similar to the NJL model, π and σ meson states are basically considered as condensates of the same quark composition, but with a different spin-parity quantum number Jπ (= 0 and 0+ for π and σ meson respectively). When we consider the finite size effect, we find that the γσ increases in the low T domain. Mott temperature decreases as R decreases, which can be observed from shifting the threshold pion decay width along the T-axis.

      Figure 5.  (color online) T dependence of pion (black) and sigma (red) meson decay widths through quark-anti-quark channel for different system sizes.

      Fig. 6(a) presents quark masses as a function of T and R. It can be observed that Mq decreases with decreasing system size due to the shrinking of the phase-space integration in gap Eq. (2). Accordingly, due to the term mπ,σ4M2q in Eqs. (18) and (19), the γπ,σ become larger (in low T domain) as the system size decreases. Knowing Mq(T,R) and mπ(T,R), the Mott temperature TM(R) can be determined as a function of R, where mπ2Mq=0. It is plotted in Fig. 6(b), from where we obtain TM(R), which is plotted as a solid red line with circles in Fig. 7. From Fig. 6 it can be observed that the Mott temperature value decreases in a lower system size. The value of the Mott temperature for R=2 fm is quite smaller than the higher volume systems.

      Figure 6.  (color online) T dependence of (a) Mq and (b) mπ2Mq for different system sized. Straight horizontal red lined, located at mπ2Mq=0, are indicating corresponding Mott temperature TM for different values of R.

      Figure 7.  (color online) Modification of transition temperature Tc and Mott temperature TM for changing the system size R, where R=10 is approximately considered as infinite volume.

      Fig. 7 represents the variation of the transition temperature and Mott transition temperature with R. The transition temperature can be obtained from the maxima of the first derivative of the chiral condensates for the different finite system sizes. As R increases, both the transition and Mott transition temperatures increase, and after R=4fm, they both attain saturation. The value of the Mott transition temperature is lower than that of the transition temperature below R=3fm. As we increase the system's size, the Mott temperature value starts increasing more than the transition temperature and saturates at a higher value than the transition temperature.

      Using the mπ,σ(T,R) and γπ,σ(T,R) in Eq. (30), we have obtained the conductivity of the pion and sigma κπ,σ(T,R), which is plotted in Fig. 8. Below the Mott temperature, a divergence trend and sharp divergence of κπ(T,R) are observed for infinite and finite system size cases. The source of divergence is the relationship κπ1/γπ. The pion and sigma meson's conductivity changes significantly with the variation of the system size and decreases with the decreasing volume. The conductivity of the pion and sigma meson merges after the transition temperature, which is again decreased as the system size decreases.

      Figure 8.  (color online) Conductivity of π (black) and σ (red) mesons or light flavor condensates with quantum numbers Jπ=0 and 0+ for R= (solid line) and 2 fm (dotted line).

      Fig. 9(a) shows the diffusion coefficients of π and σ mesons by using Eq. (32), while Fig. 9(b) shows corresponding results by using the Einstein relationship given in Eq. (34). Furthermore, one can notice the divergence nature of Dπ(T,R) below the Mott temperature and realize the feasible relationship Dπ1/γπ.

      Figure 9.  (color online) Diffusion coefficients D of π (black) and σ (red) mesons or light flavor condensates with quantum number Jπ=0 and 0+ for R= (solid line), 3 fm (dash line), and 2 fm (dotted line).

      At the end, if we briefly take a look at all the quantities of chiral partners for infinite (R=) and finite (R=2 fm) sizes of the medium, we can obtain a table, as presented in Table 1. The transition and Mott temperatures for R= and R=2 fm are presented in Table 1, which also includes the temperatures, where the masses (4th column), drag coefficients (2nd column), diffusion coefficients (3rd column), and conductivity (4th column) of π and σ mesons tend to merge. Along with the well-known conventional concepts of transition and Mott temperatures, we have defined the temperatures, beyond which the system forms the doublet of masses, drag coefficients, diffusion coefficients, conductivity. All these temperatures reveal a common fact that their positions shift towards lower values during the transition from infinite to finite system sizes. Similar to chiral condensate melting, forming mass doublets beyond the transition temperature is another demonstration of chiral symmetry restoration. Accordingly, merging other quantities such as drag, diffusion coefficients, and conductivity might also be considered alternative realization chiral symmetry restoration. In fact, collecting all quantities provides a deep understanding of the different thermodynamical properties of chiral partners and transition details from breaking to restore the phase of chiral symmetry. The transition point with respect to the drag, diffusion coefficients, and conductivity will also shifts in a lower temperature when one goes from infinite to finite size matter.

      Size Transition Temperature Mott Temperature Mass Doublet
      R= 184 200 245
      R=2 fm 166 153 223
      Size Drag Doublet Diffusion Doublet Conductivity Doublet
      R= 234 245 236
      R=2 fm 188 195 212

      Table 1.  Transition (2nd column) and Mott (3rd column) temperatures, where masses (4th column), drag coefficients (2nd column), diffusion coefficients (3rd column), and conductivity (4th column) of chiral partners are merged for R= (2nd and 5th rows) and R=2 fm (3rd and 6th rows), temperatures are in MeV.

      At the end, the reader should accept the quantitative limitations of the present simplified approach, where integration with lower momentum cut-off λ is considered in place of a quantized momentum sum. For a small system with R=2 fm, the phase space becomes significantly smaller due to larger values of lower momentum cut-off λ. We observed significant changes in different quantities due to this phase-space shrinking at R=2 fm. For this significantly smaller-size case, in principle, we should use quantized momentum sum instead of integration because of larger energy level steps. Again, in place of cubical size, considering the exact cylindrical size of RHIC or LHC matter might be a more realistic problem for phenomenological purposes. All these realistic complicated pictures are not covered in this present study, but will certainly be interesting future research problems.

    IV.   SUMMARY
    • We studied the finite volume effect on the spectral functions of strongly interacting matter at zero chemical potential. We presented the pion and sigma meson masses and decay widths at different finite system sizes. In addition, we calculated the conductivity and diffusion coefficients of pion and sigma mesons. All these quantities exhibit significant variations with the finite system size.

      At low temperatures, the chiral symmetry is broken, and after the transition temperature, the chiral symmetry is restored. The transition from the chiral symmetry broken phase to the chiral symmetry restored phase can be visualized in both the infinite and finite volume systems. Based on the quark condensate or quark mass melting, we can define a chiral transition temperature, which shifts to lower values when we go from infinite to finite size matter. An alternative chiral symmetry restoration can be realized from the merging of π and σ masses near and after the transition temperature. This merging point also shifts towards lower temperature due to finite size consideration.

      We have shown the decay widths of the pion and sigma meson masses with different system sizes. Decay widths are estimated from the imaginary part of self-energy for pion and sigma meson, which interpret the thermodynamical probabilities of their dissociation to quark and anti-quark channels. For the sigma meson, the decay width is observed for the entire temperature range. However, for the pion, the decay width begins after the Mott transition temperature, which also decreases with decreasing system size. Similar to masses of the chiral partners, their decay widths also merge in the temperature domain of the restored phase. Again, the finite size consideration makes their merging points shift towards lower temperature values. For the finite size effect, we find that the decay width of the σ meson is enhanced in the low T domain, which is a quite interesting and new outcome.

      Considering the dissociation process as the dragging mechanism of π and σ modes with a medium, we estimated their diffusion coefficients and conductivities. Low temperature π mode diffusion or conduction diverges because of the vanishing drag process below the Mott temperature; however, its non-divergent values beyond Mott temperature are merged later with corresponding quantities of σ. Similar to merging the masses and decay widths of chiral partners, their merging of diffusion and conduction values can be considered as an alternative realization of the restored phase, and again, their merging points shift towards the low-temperature direction when the size of the matter is reduced.

      The finite size effect of quark and hadronic matter, explored in this study, can be connected with RHIC or LHC phenomenology. Here, we have found mass reductions of a constituent quark and pion; however, the mass of the sigma meson remains approximately the same in the low-temperature zone. These changes modify the kinematic phase-space part of meson to quark-antiquark dissociation, as well as the diffusion probabilities of mesons. This finite size effect of the NJL model's phase-space structure can be implemented in other quantities connected with RHIC or LHC phenomenology. For example, in the exploration of the finite size effect on dilepton production, heavy mesons suppression, for which a systematic detail evolution picture has to be adopted. In a finite size system, there is the possibility of a coordinate-dependent condensate, which would be the research topic of a future study.

Reference (52)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return