Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)]

A. Gandhi; Aman Sharma; Rebecca Pachuau; Namrata Singh; L. S. Danu; S. V. Suryanarayana; B. K. Nayak; A. Kumar

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac5e26

Chinese Physics C> 2022, Vol. 46> Issue(7) : 079001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac5e26

Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)]

1.
Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
2.
Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
Experimentally measured neutron activation cross sections are presented for the $ ^{65} $Cu(n, α)$ ^{62m} $Cu, $ ^{41} $K(n, α)$ ^{38} $Cl, and $ ^{65} $Cu(n,2n)$ ^{64} $Cu reactions with detailed uncertainty propagation. The neutron cross sections were measured at an incident energy of 14.92 $ \pm $ 0.02 MeV, and the neutrons were based on the t(d, n)α fusion reaction. The $ ^{27} $Al(n, α)$ ^{24} $Na reaction was used as a reference reaction for the normalization of the neutron flux. The pre-calibrated lead-shielded HPGe detector was used to detect the residues' γ-ray spectra. The data from the measured cross sections are compared to the previously measured cross sections from the EXFOR database, theoretically calculated cross sections using the TALYS and EMPIRE codes, and evaluated nuclear data.
- nuclear reactions ,
- (n,α) and (n,2n) reactions ,
- t(d, n)α neutron source ,
- uncertainty propagation ,
- covariance analysis ,
- TALYS-1.9 and EMPIRE-3.2 code

[1]	M. Zubair , Hira Sohail , Saira Waheed , Amara Ilyas , Irfan Mahmood . Stellar Configurations in f(R, L_m, T) Gravity: Probing Anisotropy and Stability via Minimal Geometric Deformation. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-21.
[2]	Minghui Ding , Fei Gao , Sebastian M. Schmidt . Anisotropic quark propagation and Zeeman effect in an external magnetic field. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-19.
[3]	Huixiao Duan , Fan Zhang , Kailei Wang , Jun Su . Nuclear temperature of spectator source extracted by neutron spectra in ¹²⁴Sn,¹⁰⁷Sn + ¹²⁰Sn collisions at 600 MeV/nucleon. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10.
[4]	Shuang Qu , Jin-Yan Zhang , Man Bao . Nuclear mass predictions with a Bayesian neural network. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade958
[5]	. Bayesian and Monte Carlo approaches to estimating uncertainty for the measurement of the bound-state β^- decay of ²⁰⁵Tl⁸¹⁺. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 114001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade956
[6]	Bo Lan , Qin-Ze Song , Jin-Huan Sheng , Yi Qiao , Ru-Min Wang . Study of χ_cJ (J = 0,1,2) decays to light meson pairs based on SU(3) flavor symmetry/breaking analysis. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 123106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adff00
[7]	Ulaş Özdem . Unveiling the electromagnetic structure and intrinsic dynamics of spin-3/2 hidden-charm pentaquarks: A comprehensive QCD analysis. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade95a
[8]	Yu-xin Cheng , De-hao Zhao , Yue-yang Shao , Li Gong , Tao Wang , Xiao-shen Kang . SU(3) analysis for B(E2) anomaly. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/aded05
[9]	Yiming Gao , Yoshiki K. Tanaka , Vasyl Drozd , Hiroyuki Ekawa , Samuel Escrig , Yan He , Ayumi Kasagi , Enqiang Liu , Manami Nakagawa , Christophe Rappold , Takehiko R. Saito , Ryohei Sekiya , He Wang , Ayari Yanai , Xiaohong Zhou . Feasibility study of measuring interaction cross sections of hypernuclei produced in projectile fragmentation reactions with WASA-FRS setup. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf4b2
[10]	Rui Zhu , Gen Zhang , Xiao-Ye Zhang , Zi-Long Wang , Yue-Long Zhang , Jia-Le Cao , Feng-Shou Zhang . Synthesis of unknown ^287−290Og isotopes infusion-evaporation reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adec4d
[11]	D. Banerjee , S. Sahoo . Analysis of λ_b→λ l⁺l^- rare decays in a non-universal Z' model. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/083101
[12]	Peng Yin , Jianmin Dong , Wei Zuo . Effect of tensor correlations on the depletion of nuclear Fermi sea within the extended BHF approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/11/114102
[13]	ZHANG Cong , HE Yuan , ZHAO Hong-Wei , ZHANG Sheng-Hu . Multipacting simulation and analysis of a taper quarter wave cavity by using Analyst-PT3P. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(4): 362-366. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/4/012
[14]	GUO Yan-Qing , SONG Jie . Quantitative conditions for the formation of p-wave neutron halos. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(2): 158-162. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/2/010
[15]	M. Bashkanov (for the WASA-at-COSY collaboration) . ABC effect in double-pionic nuclear fusion and a pn resonance as its possible origin. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1339-1341. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/037
[16]	YANG Hong-Xun (for the BESⅡ collaboration) . Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→ppπ⁰ and measurement of J/ψ→ppη, ppη´. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(12): 1331-1335. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/048
[17]	YE Yan-Lin , ZHOU Xiao-Hong , LIU Wei-Ping , MA Yu-Gang , ZHANG Yu-Hu , XU Fu-Rong . Outline of the progress in the study of radioactive nuclear physics and super-heavy nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 1-7.
[18]	Medina Ablikim , HUANG Wei-Cheng , . New Realization of N=2 Supersymmetric QuantumMechanics and Shape Invariance. Chinese Physics C, 2002, 26(4): 338-345.
[19]	Yang Jianjun , Ma Boqiang , Li Guanglie . Non-perturbative Quark Propagator and the Study of the Non-trivial Q² Dependence in the Nucleon Structure Functions. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(2): 146-156.
[20]	BES Collaboration . Experimental Study of Resonance f₂(1270) in the J/ψ Hadronic Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1993, 17(2): 97-106.

Access

Get Citation

A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau, Namrata Singh, L. S. Danu, S. V. Suryanarayana, B. K. Nayak and A. Kumar. Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)][J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac5e26

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2022-02-11

Article Metric

Article Views(2218)
PDF Downloads(30)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)]

Corresponding author: A. Kumar, ajaytyagi@bhu.ac.in

1. Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India

2. Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India

Received Date: 2022-02-11

Available Online: 2022-07-15

Abstract: Experimentally measured neutron activation cross sections are presented for the $ ^{65} $Cu(n, α)$ ^{62m} $Cu, $ ^{41} $K(n, α)$ ^{38} $Cl, and $ ^{65} $Cu(n,2n)$ ^{64} $Cu reactions with detailed uncertainty propagation. The neutron cross sections were measured at an incident energy of 14.92 $ \pm $ 0.02 MeV, and the neutrons were based on the t(d, n)α fusion reaction. The $ ^{27} $Al(n, α)$ ^{24} $Na reaction was used as a reference reaction for the normalization of the neutron flux. The pre-calibrated lead-shielded HPGe detector was used to detect the residues' γ-ray spectra. The data from the measured cross sections are compared to the previously measured cross sections from the EXFOR database, theoretically calculated cross sections using the TALYS and EMPIRE codes, and evaluated nuclear data.

HTML

After the publication of the paper, we found three corrections on pages 5 and 6. The first correction is on page 5, two lines above equation 4, the sentence "adding the matrix of 12 subsets (attributes) using......", is incorrect and the correct one is "adding the matrix of 13 subsets (attributes) using.....".

The second is on page 5, in equation 6, there should be no square in the denominator. The correct form of Eq. (6) should be

$ \begin{equation} {\rm Cor} (\sigma_{s_i},\sigma_{s_j})=\frac{{\rm Cov}(\sigma_{s_i},\sigma_{s_j})}{(\bigtriangleup\sigma_{s_i}) \times (\bigtriangleup\sigma_{s_j})} \end{equation} $

(1)

The third is on page 6, in table 8, column 4, row 3; "0.1237" is incorrect and the correct value is "0.1252".

Erratum: Measurement of (n, α) and (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at a neutron energy of 14.92 ± 0.02 MeV for potassium and copper with uncertainty propagation, [A. Gandhi, Aman Sharma, Rebecca Pachuau et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014002 (2022)]

Abstract：

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Email This Article