Processing math: 100%

Shadow images and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by different accretions

  • In this paper, by exploring photon motion in the region near a Bardeen black hole, we studied the shadow and observed properties of the black hole surrounded by various accretion models. We analyzed the changes in shadow imaging and observed luminosity when the relevant physical parameters are changed. For the different spherical accretion backgrounds, we find that the radius of shadow and the position of the photon sphere do not change, but the observed intensity of shadow in the infalling accretion model is significantly lower than that in the static case. We also studied the contribution of the photon rings, lensing rings and direct emission to the total observed flux when the black hole is surrounded by an optically thin disk accretion. Under the different forms of the emission modes, the results show that the observed brightness is mainly determined by direct emission, while the lensing rings will provide a small part of the observed flux, and the flux provided by the photon ring is negligible. By comparing our results with the Schwarzschild spacetime, we find that the existence or change of relevant status parameters will greatly affect the shape and observed intensity of the black hole shadow. These results support the theory that the change of state parameter will affect the spacetime structure, thus affecting the observed features of black hole shadows.
  • In ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions (HIC) at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), strongly coupled QCD matter known as quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is created, which exhibits many intriguing properties. QCD partons produced from early stage collisions may traverse through QGP, and its interactions with other partons in the QGP may lead to the attenuation of its energy, that is, jet quenching [16]. Among the convincing evidence of jet quenching effects is the strong suppression of inclusive hadron spectra at high transverse momentum (pT) [2]. Abundant experimental data from the RHIC and LHC on identified-hadron yields help us better understand the processes of jet-medium interactions and are well described within the next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD (pQCD) improved parton model incorporated with the higher-twist approach [611, 13]. Studies on the medium modification effect on different final-state hadron production in various collision systems are therefore essential for constraining our understanding of hadron suppression patterns [1417].

    Suppression represented by the nuclear modification factor RAA of different final-state hadrons, π0, η, and ϕ, at large pT [1820] provides useful information in many respects, such as extracting the jet transport coefficient ˆq [21]. Moreover, the particle ratios η/π0, ρ0/π0, and ϕ/π0 can help better understand energy-loss patterns. In our previous research on the production of different final-state hadrons in HIC [1417], we concluded that the leading hadron productions in HIC are the combined results of three factors: the initial hard parton-jet spectrum, the parton energy loss mechanism, and parton fragmentation functions (FFs) to the hadron in vacuum. For instance, the derived yield ratios η/π0 and ρ0/π0 in p+p and A+A collisions coincide at large pT. This is due to the fact that η, π0, ρ0 are all dominated by quark fragmentation contributions at very large pT in p+p collisions, and the jet quenching effect will enhance the quark fragmentation contribution fraction (with a relatively weak pT and zh dependence on their quark FFs, where zh denotes the momentum fraction of the hadron h fragmented from a scattered quark or gluon). Therefore, at very large pT in A+A collisions, the relative contribution of quark and gluon fragmentations is small, and the particle ratios η/π0, ρ0/π0 in A+A collisions will mainly be determined by the ratios of quark FFs to the different final-state hadrons, which is the same as that in p+p collisions. For the mesons ϕ and ω, gluon fragmentation contributions dominate at large pT in p+p collisions, and the particle ratios ϕ/π0 and ω/π0 in A+A collisions vary from those in p+p collisions. The magnitude of this variation can help expose the difference between quark and gluon energy loss. Hence, in this study, we choose the π0, η, and ϕ mesons as benchmarks to display final-state hadron yields in HIC. To achieve this, it is important to first investigate the amount of this variation in different nuclear-nuclear collision systems, which will introduce different energy densities and path lengths in the QGP medium. The emergence of experimental measurements in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV can facilitate such investigations [23] because they are conducted at similar colliding energies with Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV but have an intermediate-size collision system between previous proton-proton (p+p), p+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions [27, 28].

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The theoretical framework for leading hadron production in p+p collisions is presented in Sec. II, and the p+p spectra of charged hadron, π0, η, and ϕ production are plotted. In Sec. III, we deliberate on the nuclear modifications of leading hadron yields due to the jet quenching effect in A+A collisions. We subsequently investigate the nuclear modification factor RAA of charged hadrons and π0, η, and ϕ mesons as well as their yield ratios in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV. In Sec. IV, the scaled ratios of different final-state hadron production in the Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV system over those in the Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV system, denoted as RXePb, is demonstrated. A brief summary is given in Sec. V.

    Within the pQCD improved parton model at NLO [13], the inclusive cross section of single hadron production in p+p collisions is determined by two factors: the initial hard parton-jet spectrum Fq,g(pT/zh) and the parton FFs to final-state hadrons in vacuum, Dq,gh(zh,Q2).

    1pTdσhdpT=Fq(pTzh)Dqh(zh,Q2)dzhz2h+Fg(pTzh)Dgh(zh,Q2)dzhz2h.

    (1)

    where Fq,g(pT/zh) is the convolution of initial parton distribution functions (PDFs) and partonic scattering cross sections, in which zh is the momentum fraction carried by the final hadron of its parent parton at the fragmentation scale Q. In this study, the factorization, renormalization, and fragmentation scales are taken to be equal and proportional to the final-state pT of the leading hadron. CT14 parametrization [39] is employed for proton PDFs. KKP FFs [33] are utilized for both π0 and charged hadron production, AESSS FFs [35] are used for η mesons, and NLO Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolved FFs parametrized at the initial energy scale Q20=1.5 GeV2 by a broken SU(3) model are used for ϕ mesons [2931].

    Note that KKP parametrizations are chosen because, during our calculations, we find that the NLO theoretical results of π0 production using the AKK08 [32], KKP [33], or KRE [34] FFs cannot simultaneously describe the experimental data from relatively low collision energies, such as 200 GeV, at the RHIC to very high collisions energies, such as 13 TeV, at the LHC. This predicament is also pointed out in Refs. [3638], and the same occurs in the charged hadron and η calculations. However, when we focus on LHC energies, KKP parametrizations can effectively describe the experimental data for charged hadron production. KKP parametrizations are also able to describe π0 production at all collision energies within a margin of error with a re-scale factor K. The same method is applied to AESSS parametrizations in η FFs to provide decent p+p baselines at all collision energies with a K factor.

    In Fig. 1, we present the numerical results of the final-state yields of charged hadrons, π0, η, and ϕ at 2.76 TeV to 13 TeV and their comparison with all available experimental data [27, 4150]. For charged hadron production, our calculation results agree well with experimental data [27, 45, 46] at all available energies in the margin of error when we fix the scales at μ=μf=μr=1.0 pT. For the π0 yields [4144], we utilize KKP parametrizations of FFs in vacuum with Kπ0=0.5 and scales of μ=1.0 pT. For the η yields [4144], AESSS FFs with the rescale factor Kη=0.6 are utilized when fixing μ=1.0 pT. ϕ production with μ=1.0 pT also gives a decent description of the ALICE measurements [4750] as the collision energy reaches 13 TeV.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (color online) Final-state calculations of charged hadrons (upper left), π0 (upper right), η (bottom left), and ϕ (bottom right) in p+p collisions over a wide range of LHC energy scales compared with available experimental data [27, 4150].

    To facilitate the parton energy loss mechanism of final-state hadron production in HIC, we factorize the process into two steps. A fast parton first loses energy owing to multiple scatterings with other partons in the hot and dense medium. It then fragments into final-state hadrons in vacuum. The total energy loss is carried away by radiated gluons and embodied in medium-modified quark FFs with the higher-twist approach [611],

    ˜Dhq(zh,Q2)=Dhq(zh,Q2)+αs(Q2)2πQ20d2T2T×1zhdzz[Δγqqg(z,x,xL,2T)Dhq(zhz,Q2)+Δγqgq(z,x,xL,2T)Dhg(zhz,Q2)].

    (2)

    where T is the transverse momentum of the radiated gluons. Gluon radiation is then induced by the scattering of the quark with another gluon carrying a finite momentum fraction x. xL denotes the longitudinal momentum fraction, z is the momentum fraction carried by the final quark, and Δγqqg(z,x,xL,2T) and Δγqgq(z,x,xL,2T)=Δγqqg(1z,x,xL,2T) are the medium modified splitting functions [6, 7, 10, 11] which depend on the twist-four quark-gluon correlations inside the medium TAqg(x,xL),

    Δγqqg(z,x,xL,2T)=[1+z2(1z)+TAqg(x,xL)+δ(1z)× ΔTAqg(x,xL)]2παsCA2TNcfAq(x);

    (3)

    Δγqgq(z,x,xL,2T)=Δγqqg(1z,x,xL,2T).

    (4)

    where αs is the strong coupling constant, fAq(x) is the initial hard parton-jet spectrum, and

    TAqg(x,xL)fAq(x)=N2c14παsCR1+z2dy2sin2[y2T4Ez(1z)]×[ˆqR(E,xL,y)+c(x,xL)ˆqR(E,0,y)].

    (5)

    is proportional to jet transport parameter ˆqR(E,y) when assuming xxL,xT [612]. The medium-modified FFs are averaged over the initial production position and jet propagation direction as follows [8, 9] :

    ˜Dha(zh,Q2,E,b)=1d2rtA(|r|)tB(|br|)

    ×dϕ2πd2rtA(|r|)tB(|br|)טDha(zh,Q2,E,r,ϕ,b).

    (6)

    where the impact parameter b and nuclear thickness function tA,B are provided by the Glauber Model [54]. Then, we assume the total energy loss is the energy carried away by the radiated gluon.

    ΔEE=2Ncαsπdydzd2T1+z24T×(11z2)ˆq(E,y)sin2[y2T4Ez(1z)],

    (7)

    which is also proportional to the jet transport parameter ˆqR(E,y). The jet transport parameter ˆqR(E,y) depends on the space-time evolution of the QCD medium, and in our study, it is described by a (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc [5153]. To take the initial-state cold nuclear matter effects into consideration, EPPS16 NLO nuclear PDFs (nPDFs) [40] are employed. Therefore, leading hadron production in A+A collisions at NLO can be obtained in a similar way as in p+p collisions so that NLO partonic cross sections are convoluted with NLO nuclear PDFs and are then convoluted with the effective medium-modified fragmentaion functions ˜Dhq(zh,Q2).

    The nuclear modification factor RAA for single hadron production is defined as the ratio of cross sections in A+A collisions over that in p+p collisions scaled by the averaged number of binary N+N collisions at a certain impact parameter b,

    RbAB(pT,y)=dσhAB/dydpTNABbin(b)dσhpp/dydpT .

    (8)

    where NABbin(b) is calculated using the optical Glauber method with a deformed Fermi distribution [54, 55],

    R=1.1A1/30.656A1/3 fm,

    (9)

    ρA(r,θ)=ρ01+exp(rRA(θ))/a,

    (10)

    RA(θ)=R[1+β2Y20(θ)+β4Y40(θ)]

    (11)

    in which for 129Xe, A = 129, a = 0.68 fm, β2 = 0.162, and β4= -0.003, and Y20 and Y40 are spherical harmonics [54]. The theoretical results of RAA for η, ρ0, ϕ, ω, K0S production in central Pb + Pb collisions at sNN = 2.76 TeV are in good agreement with experimental data [1417].

    In the upper panel of Fig. 2, the nuclear modification factor RAA of charged hadrons as a function of pT in the most central (0%–5%) Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV is plotted with ˆq0=0.71.5GeV2/fm, which is extracted from the χ2/d.o.f fit in the bottom panel. The theoretical plots of ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm effectively describe both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data. The bottom panel of Fig. 2 shows the χ2/d.o.f fit of charged hadrons RAA to compare the theoretical results at various values of ˆq0 with both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV, and the best value of the jet transport coefficient is ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm. Within the uncertainty of ˆq0=0.71.5GeV2/fm, the theoretical results exhibit a relatively small deviation from experimental data and are thus considered to be in a reasonable range. It is noted that this χ2 fit is performed at a fixed scale, μ = 1.0 pT, and theoretical uncertainties in nPDFs and FFs as well as from scale variations are not considered. Systematic and statistical uncertainties provided by the LHC are treated equally in our calculations.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (color online) Upper: Nuclear modification factor RAA of charged hadrons as a function of pT compared with both CMS [27] (blue stars) and ALICE [28] (green dots) data in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV. The best value of ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm is shown by the red solid line. Bottom: χ2/d.o.f calculations between theoretical results and both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data of RAA for charged hadrons in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN=5.44 TeV.

    Now, we predict the RAA of π0 (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function of pT in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV with ˆq0=0.71.5GeV2/fm. The results are given in Fig. 3. The trends in the pT dependence of different final-state hadron species are similar, and we can naturally predict the particle ratios in Xe+Xe collisions. In Fig. 4, the particle yield ratios η/π0 (up) and ϕ/π0 (down) as functions of pT in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV with the p+p reference (red solid line) are demonstrated. In the upper panel, the η/π0 ratios in p+p collisions are almost independent of pT and remain constant at 0.5, which is exactly the case at 200 GeV and 2.76 TeV calculated in our previous study [14].

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (color online) Nuclear modification factor RAA of π0 (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function of pT in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV. ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm is represented by the red solid line.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (color online) Particle yield ratios η/π0 (up) and ϕ/π0 (down) in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).

    The particle ratios η/π0 (up) and ϕ/π0 (down) as functions of pT in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV are plotted in Fig. 5 as a supplement. We find that η/π0 in A+A collisions coincides with that in p+p collisions at larger pT, reaching a constant of 0.5 in Au+Au 200 GeV, Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, and Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions. This ratio is not affected by different choices of ˆq0 at higher pT. This is the result of the η and π0 yields being dominated by quark fragmentation contributions at large pT in p+p collisions. The jet quenching effect will enhance the quark contribution fraction so that the ratio in A+A collisions remains the same as that in p+p collisions, which can be described by the ratio of the corresponding FFs in vacuum [14].

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (color online) Particle yield ratios η/π0 (up) and ϕ/π0 (down) in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).

    In the bottom panel of Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, the ϕ/π0 ratio in p+p collisions is approximately constant at 0.1 as the final-state pT increases. However, in A+A collisions, the ratio ϕ/π0 slightly decreases with increasing pT, and the curves for A+A collisions are lower than those for p+p collisions. By comprehensively comparing the modifications of ϕ/π0 induced by the hot and dense medium created at different collision energies from relatively lower collision energies of 200 GeV in Au+Au collisions at the RHIC and 2.76 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC [16] to higher energies of 5.02 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions and 5.44 TeV in Xe+Xe collisions, the deviation between the two curves in p+p and A+A collisions is found to decrease with increasing collision energy in the intermediate and larger region of pT. The mechanism behind these deviations is as follows: ϕ production at large pT is dominated by the gluon fragmentation contribution, whereas π0 production is dominated by quarks in p+p collisions. The energy loss effect will depress the gluon contribution fraction and enhance the quark fraction owing to the larger energy loss of gluons than quarks [16].

    Path-length dependence is a fundamental characteristic of the jet quenching theory, which describes how the energy loss depends on the length of a parton traversing the QCD medium. In October 2017, 129Xe+ 129Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV were measured by the LHC in addition to 208Pb + 208Pb collisions. At comparable collision energies (5.02 and 5.44 TeV), the system size was the main difference between Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions. It is interesting to directly compare the medium modifications of inclusive hadron production in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV and in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV systems. Because the p+p reference of the nuclear modification factors in both systems can be assumed to be approximately equal, a scaled ratio between the final-state hadron spectra in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions is proposed [27].

    RXePb(pT)=dNXeXe/dpTdNPbPb/dpTTPbPbTXeXe.

    (12)

    where dNPbPb,XeXe/dpT are the final-state hadron yields in Pb+Pb (Xe+Xe) collisions, which are scaled by the nuclear overlap function TPbPb,XeXe=Ncoll/σpp obtained through the Glauber Model. The total cross sections are σpp5.44=(68.4±0.5) mb and σpp5.02=(67.6±0.6) mb. The radii of the 207Pb and 129Xe nuclei are 6.62 and 5.36 fm, respectively [54]. With comparable collision energies (5.02 TeV and 5.44 TeV) and initial temperatures (502 MeV and 484 MeV, estimated by the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc), this observable has been proven by the CMS [27] to be able to experimentally expose the system size (path length) dependence of the jet quenching effect in hadron production in A+A collisions. We can see from Eq. (12) that to calculate RXePb(pT), final-state leading hadron spectra in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV are required.

    In Fig. 6, we plot RAA distributions as a function of final-state pT for charged hadrons, π0, η, and ϕ in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV compared with LHC data [42, 46, 48, 56]. In the upper left plots, we present the case of charged hadrons; the theoretical plots within the uncertainty of ˆq0=1.22.0GeV2/fm can describe both ALICE [56] and CMS [46] data well, with a best value of ˆq0=1.5GeV2/fm. The same theoretical uncertainty in ˆq0 is utilized to describe the RAA distributions of π0, η, and ϕ in the other plots of Fig. 6, where we find that the results of π0 and ϕ can describe ALICE data [42, 48]. This value is higher than ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV, corresponding ˆq/T3 range with an initial temperature T0 = 502 MeV at initial time τ0=0.6 fm/c, and the central position is 1.6 2.8 in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. This value in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN=5.44 TeV is 1.8 2.6 with an initial temperature T0 = 484 MeV. We note that the JET Collaboration found that ˆq/T3 has a dependence on the medium temperature T [21], and the baryon chemical potential μB dependence of ˆq as well as jet properties such as the momentum of jet partons, mass, flavor, and the strong coupling constant is investigated in Refs. [25, 26]. Therefore, at different collision energies, initial temperatures, and nucleus radii, the extracted best value of ˆq0 is expected to differ. More experimental data will help us better constrain such an extraction, especially in Xe+Xe collisions.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (color online) Nuclear modification factor RAA of charged hadrons (upper left), π0 (upper right), η (bottom left), and ϕ (bottom right) as a function of pT in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV compared with CMS and ALICE data [42, 46, 48, 56]. ˆq0=1.5GeV2/fm is represented by the red solid line.

    By comparing the results in Fig. 3 and Fig. 6, we find that the RAA distributions of all four final-state hadrons in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions are slightly less suppressed than those in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV collisions, which agrees with the experimental observation of charged hadron RAA measurements by ALICE [28] and CMS [27].

    Now, we are able to demonstrate the scaled ratios RXePb of charged hadrons, π0, η, and ϕ as functions of pT in 0%–5%, the most central collisions in Fig. 7, with the experimental data points of charged hadron production provided by CMS [27], and the ratio of the p+p reference at 5.44 TeV over that at 5.02 TeV, (dσpp5.44dpT/dσpp5.02dpT), is also plotted as the "scaled p+p reference" (dotted line), which represents contributions from the differences in collision energies. The scaled ratios of all four final-state hadrons are found at the best value of ˆq0 in both the Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb systems. The calculation results for charged hadrons agree with the experimental data within the margin of error. The predictions for π0, η, and ϕ almost coincide with the charged hadron curve. The deviation of RXePb from the p+p reference ratio suggests that production suppression in Xe+Xe collisions is smaller than that in Pb+Pb collisions and shows that a larger system size contributes more suppression to the nuclear modification factor, which is consistent with the comparison of RAA in these two systems. We note that although cold nuclear matter (CNM) effects from nPDFs may impact particle yields at large pT in A+A collisions, their contributions to RXePb are negligible with the understanding that CNM effects largely cancel each other out where the scaled ratio is concerned.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  (color online) Scaled ratio RXePb of charged hadron, π0, η, and ϕ production in 0%–5% central collisions compared with the CMS data on charged hadrons [27].

    In this study, we predict π0, η, and ϕ yields in Xe+Xe collisions at sNN = 5.44 TeV within the NLO pQCD improved parton model by considering the jet quenching effect with the higher-twist approach. The jet transport coefficient ˆq0 is extracted by fitting the RAA of charged hadron production with both ALICE and CMS data. The nuclear modification factors of π0, η, and ϕ as functions of pT are then predicted. Cases involving Pb+Pb collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV are also provided for comparison. In all systems, we study from Au+Au at 200 GeV to Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV to Xe+Xe at 5.44 TeV. The curves of η/π0 in p+p and A+A collisions coincide at a constant of 0.5 and show little dependence on pT; however, the A+A curves of ϕ/π0 consistently deviate from their p+p references, and only the deviations exhibit a slight dependence on the collision energies. The nuclear modification factors of π0, η, ϕ, and charged hadrons in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions are slightly less suppressed than those in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV collisions. The theoretical results of the scaled ratio RXePb of final-state π0, η, and ϕ coincide with the curve of charged hadron production, which can describe the CMS data within the margin of error, indicating that the path-length effect is independent of the species of final-state hadrons.

    We express our thanks to Dr. Xiang-Yu Wu for providing detailed profiles of the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc and Dr. Man Xie and Guo-Yang Ma for helpful discussions.

    [1] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L1 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7
    [2] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L2 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c96
    [3] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L3 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57
    [4] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L4 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85
    [5] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L5 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43
    [6] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L6 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141
    [7] R. M. Wald, General Relativity, (The University of Chicago Press, 1984)
    [8] M. Jaroszynski and A. Kurpiewski, Astron. Astrophys. 326, 419 (1997)
    [9] R. Shaikh, P. Kocherlakota, R. Narayan and P. S. Joshi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482(1), 52-64 (2019) doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2624
    [10] S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca, Phys. Rev. D 101(4), 044031 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044031
    [11] A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi et al., JCAP 2002, 003 (2020)
    [12] P. C. Li, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 101(8), 084041 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084041
    [13] I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty, and S. SenGupta, Phys. Rev. D 101(4), 041301 (2020)
    [14] S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024020 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024020
    [15] S. Vagnozzi, C. Bambi, and L. Visinelli, Class. Quant. Grav. 37(8), 087001 (2020) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab7965
    [16] M. Safarzadeh, A. Loeb, and M. Reid, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488(1), L90 (2019) doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz108
    [17] H. Davoudiasl and P. B. Denton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(2), 021102 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.021102
    [18] R. Roy and U. A. Yajnik, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135284 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135284
    [19] R. Roy and S. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. D 102(2), 024059 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024059
    [20] Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(6), 061102 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.061102
    [21] R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(11), 1049 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08639-8
    [22] S. U. Islam, R. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, JCAP 09, 030 (2020)
    [23] X. H. Jin, Y. X. Gao, and D. J. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29(09), 2050065 (2020) doi: 10.1142/S0218271820500650
    [24] M. Guo and P. C. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(6), 588 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8164-7
    [25] S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136(4), 436 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01398-9
    [26] A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl, Phys. Rev. D 89(12), 124004 (2014) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.124004
    [27] Q. Li, Y. Zhu, and T. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 2 (2022) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09959-z
    [28] P. V. P. Cunha, N. A. Eiró, C. A. R. Herdeiro et al., JCAP 2003(03), 035 (2020)
    [29] L. Amarilla and E. F. Eiroa, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064019 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064019
    [30] Y. Hou, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 104(2), 024001 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024001
    [31] Z. Zhong, Z. Hu, H. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. D 104(10), 104028 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104028
    [32] Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P. C. Li et al., Phys. Rev. D 103(4), 044057 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044057
    [33] F. Long, J. Wang, S. Chen et al., JHEP 10, 269 (2019)
    [34] M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, The shadows of Schwarzschild black hole with halos, arXiv: 2112.04170 [gr-qc]
    [35] M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D 104(8), 084021 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084021
    [36] F. Long, S. Chen, M. Wang et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 80(12), 1180 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8
    [37] M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, JCAP 04, 066 (2021)
    [38] K. Jafarzade, M. Kord Zangeneh, and F. S. N. Lobo, JCAP 04, 008 (2021)
    [39] Z. Chang and Q. H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102(4), 044012 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044012
    [40] D. Dey, R. Shaikh, and P. S. Joshi, Phys. Rev. D 103(2), 024015 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024015
    [41] S. Li, A. A. Abdujabbarov, and W. B. Han, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(7), 649 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09445-6
    [42] W. D. Guo, S. W. Wei, and Y. X. Liu, Shadow of a nonsingular black hole, arXiv: 2203.13477 [gr-qc]
    [43] A. Belhaj, H. Belmahi, M. Benali et al., Optical Shadows of Rotating Bardeen AdS Black Holes, arXiv: 2202.10892 [gr-qc]
    [44] O. Porth et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Suppl. 243(2), 26 (2019) doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab29fd
    [45] J. L. Synge, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 131(3), 463 (1966) doi: 10.1093/mnras/131.3.463
    [46] J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric, In Black Holes (Proceedings, Ecole d'Et de Physique Thorique: Les Astres Occlus: Les Houches, France, August, 1972)edited by C. DeWitt and B.S. Dewitt.
    [47] J. -P. Luminet, Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228 (1979)
    [48] R. Narayan, M. D. Johnson, and C. F. Gammie, Astrophys. J. 885(2), L33 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab518c
    [49] H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Astrophys. J. 528, L13 (2000) doi: 10.1086/312423
    [50] C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D 87, 107501 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.107501
    [51] X. X. Zeng, H. Q. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(9), 872 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08449-y
    [52] S. Guo, K. J. He, G. R. Li et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 38(16), 165013 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac12e4
    [53] X. Qin, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Class. Quant. Grav. 38(11), 115008 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abf712
    [54] S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024018 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018
    [55] X. X. Zeng and H. Q. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(11), 1058 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08656-7
    [56] J. Peng, M. Guo, and X. H. Feng, Chin. Phys. C 45(8), 085103 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac06bb
    [57] J. Peng, M. Guo, and X. H. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 104(12), 124010 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124010
    [58] K. J. He, S. C. Tan, and G. P. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 81 (2022) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10032-6
    [59] G. P. Li and K. J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(11), 1018 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09817-y
    [60] X. X. Zeng, K. J. He, and G. P. Li, Influence of dark matter on shadows and rings of a brane-world black hole illuminated by various accretions, arXiv: 2111.05090 [gr-qc]
    [61] X. X. Zeng, G. P. Li, and K. J. He, Nucl. Phys. B 974, 115639 (2022) doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115639
    [62] Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. D 104(4), 044049 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044049
    [63] G. P. Li and K. J. He, JCAP 06, 037 (2021)
    [64] M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia et al., JCAP 08, 036 (2021)
    [65] S. Guo, G. R. Li, and E. W. Liang, Phys. Rev. D 105(2), 023024 (2022) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023024
    [66] James M Bardeen, Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse. In Proc. Int. Conf. GR5, Tbilisi, volume 174, (1968)
    [67] J. Man and H. Cheng, Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1660 (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10714-013-1660-4
    [68] Eloy Ayón-Beato and Alberto Garcıa, Phys. Lett. B 493(1-2), 149-152 (2000) doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4
    [69] Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, Physi. Rev. Lett. 80(23), 5056 (1998) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5056
    [70] Sean A Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(3), 031103 (2006) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103
    [71] Waldemar Berej, Jerzy Matyjasek, Dariusz Tryniecki et al., General Relativity and Gravitation 38(5), 885 (2006) doi: 10.1007/s10714-006-0270-9
    [72] A. Borde, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3692-3702 (1994) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3692
    [73] A. Borde, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7615-7617 (1997)
    [74] E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 085008 (2011) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/8/085008
    [75] P. Pradhan, Regular Black Holes as Particle Accelerators, arXiv: 1402.2748 [gr-qc]
    [76] X. Y. Hu, K. J. He, Z. H. Li et al., Chin. Phys. B 29(5), 050401 (2020) doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab7daa
    [77] H. Ghaffarnejad and H. Niad, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(3), 1492-1505 (2016) doi: 10.1007/s10773-015-2787-8
    [78] M. Saleh, B. B. Thomas, and T. C. Kofane, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57(9), 2640-2647 (2018) doi: 10.1007/s10773-018-3784-5
    [79] K. V. Rajani, C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, A. Naveena Kumara et al., Nucl. Phys. B 960, 115166 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115166
    [80] B. Narzilloev, J. Rayimbaev, S. Shaymatov et al., Phys. Rev. D 102(10), 104062 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104062
    [81] Z. Stuchlík and J. Schee, Eur. Phys. J. C 79(1), 44 (2019) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6543-8
    [82] J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972) doi: 10.1086/151796
  • [1] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L1 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7
    [2] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L2 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c96
    [3] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L3 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57
    [4] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L4 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85
    [5] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L5 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43
    [6] K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 875(1), L6 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141
    [7] R. M. Wald, General Relativity, (The University of Chicago Press, 1984)
    [8] M. Jaroszynski and A. Kurpiewski, Astron. Astrophys. 326, 419 (1997)
    [9] R. Shaikh, P. Kocherlakota, R. Narayan and P. S. Joshi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482(1), 52-64 (2019) doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2624
    [10] S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca, Phys. Rev. D 101(4), 044031 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044031
    [11] A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi et al., JCAP 2002, 003 (2020)
    [12] P. C. Li, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 101(8), 084041 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084041
    [13] I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty, and S. SenGupta, Phys. Rev. D 101(4), 041301 (2020)
    [14] S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024020 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024020
    [15] S. Vagnozzi, C. Bambi, and L. Visinelli, Class. Quant. Grav. 37(8), 087001 (2020) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab7965
    [16] M. Safarzadeh, A. Loeb, and M. Reid, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488(1), L90 (2019) doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz108
    [17] H. Davoudiasl and P. B. Denton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(2), 021102 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.021102
    [18] R. Roy and U. A. Yajnik, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135284 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135284
    [19] R. Roy and S. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. D 102(2), 024059 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024059
    [20] Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(6), 061102 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.061102
    [21] R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(11), 1049 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08639-8
    [22] S. U. Islam, R. Kumar, and S. G. Ghosh, JCAP 09, 030 (2020)
    [23] X. H. Jin, Y. X. Gao, and D. J. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29(09), 2050065 (2020) doi: 10.1142/S0218271820500650
    [24] M. Guo and P. C. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(6), 588 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8164-7
    [25] S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136(4), 436 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01398-9
    [26] A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl, Phys. Rev. D 89(12), 124004 (2014) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.124004
    [27] Q. Li, Y. Zhu, and T. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 2 (2022) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09959-z
    [28] P. V. P. Cunha, N. A. Eiró, C. A. R. Herdeiro et al., JCAP 2003(03), 035 (2020)
    [29] L. Amarilla and E. F. Eiroa, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064019 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064019
    [30] Y. Hou, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 104(2), 024001 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024001
    [31] Z. Zhong, Z. Hu, H. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. D 104(10), 104028 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104028
    [32] Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P. C. Li et al., Phys. Rev. D 103(4), 044057 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044057
    [33] F. Long, J. Wang, S. Chen et al., JHEP 10, 269 (2019)
    [34] M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, The shadows of Schwarzschild black hole with halos, arXiv: 2112.04170 [gr-qc]
    [35] M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D 104(8), 084021 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084021
    [36] F. Long, S. Chen, M. Wang et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 80(12), 1180 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8
    [37] M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, JCAP 04, 066 (2021)
    [38] K. Jafarzade, M. Kord Zangeneh, and F. S. N. Lobo, JCAP 04, 008 (2021)
    [39] Z. Chang and Q. H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102(4), 044012 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044012
    [40] D. Dey, R. Shaikh, and P. S. Joshi, Phys. Rev. D 103(2), 024015 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024015
    [41] S. Li, A. A. Abdujabbarov, and W. B. Han, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(7), 649 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09445-6
    [42] W. D. Guo, S. W. Wei, and Y. X. Liu, Shadow of a nonsingular black hole, arXiv: 2203.13477 [gr-qc]
    [43] A. Belhaj, H. Belmahi, M. Benali et al., Optical Shadows of Rotating Bardeen AdS Black Holes, arXiv: 2202.10892 [gr-qc]
    [44] O. Porth et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Suppl. 243(2), 26 (2019) doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab29fd
    [45] J. L. Synge, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 131(3), 463 (1966) doi: 10.1093/mnras/131.3.463
    [46] J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric, In Black Holes (Proceedings, Ecole d'Et de Physique Thorique: Les Astres Occlus: Les Houches, France, August, 1972)edited by C. DeWitt and B.S. Dewitt.
    [47] J. -P. Luminet, Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228 (1979)
    [48] R. Narayan, M. D. Johnson, and C. F. Gammie, Astrophys. J. 885(2), L33 (2019) doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab518c
    [49] H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Astrophys. J. 528, L13 (2000) doi: 10.1086/312423
    [50] C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D 87, 107501 (2013) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.107501
    [51] X. X. Zeng, H. Q. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(9), 872 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08449-y
    [52] S. Guo, K. J. He, G. R. Li et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 38(16), 165013 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac12e4
    [53] X. Qin, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Class. Quant. Grav. 38(11), 115008 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abf712
    [54] S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024018 (2019) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018
    [55] X. X. Zeng and H. Q. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(11), 1058 (2020) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08656-7
    [56] J. Peng, M. Guo, and X. H. Feng, Chin. Phys. C 45(8), 085103 (2021) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac06bb
    [57] J. Peng, M. Guo, and X. H. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 104(12), 124010 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124010
    [58] K. J. He, S. C. Tan, and G. P. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 81 (2022) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10032-6
    [59] G. P. Li and K. J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(11), 1018 (2021) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09817-y
    [60] X. X. Zeng, K. J. He, and G. P. Li, Influence of dark matter on shadows and rings of a brane-world black hole illuminated by various accretions, arXiv: 2111.05090 [gr-qc]
    [61] X. X. Zeng, G. P. Li, and K. J. He, Nucl. Phys. B 974, 115639 (2022) doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115639
    [62] Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. D 104(4), 044049 (2021) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044049
    [63] G. P. Li and K. J. He, JCAP 06, 037 (2021)
    [64] M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia et al., JCAP 08, 036 (2021)
    [65] S. Guo, G. R. Li, and E. W. Liang, Phys. Rev. D 105(2), 023024 (2022) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023024
    [66] James M Bardeen, Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse. In Proc. Int. Conf. GR5, Tbilisi, volume 174, (1968)
    [67] J. Man and H. Cheng, Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1660 (2014) doi: 10.1007/s10714-013-1660-4
    [68] Eloy Ayón-Beato and Alberto Garcıa, Phys. Lett. B 493(1-2), 149-152 (2000) doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4
    [69] Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, Physi. Rev. Lett. 80(23), 5056 (1998) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5056
    [70] Sean A Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(3), 031103 (2006) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103
    [71] Waldemar Berej, Jerzy Matyjasek, Dariusz Tryniecki et al., General Relativity and Gravitation 38(5), 885 (2006) doi: 10.1007/s10714-006-0270-9
    [72] A. Borde, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3692-3702 (1994) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3692
    [73] A. Borde, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7615-7617 (1997)
    [74] E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 085008 (2011) doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/8/085008
    [75] P. Pradhan, Regular Black Holes as Particle Accelerators, arXiv: 1402.2748 [gr-qc]
    [76] X. Y. Hu, K. J. He, Z. H. Li et al., Chin. Phys. B 29(5), 050401 (2020) doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab7daa
    [77] H. Ghaffarnejad and H. Niad, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(3), 1492-1505 (2016) doi: 10.1007/s10773-015-2787-8
    [78] M. Saleh, B. B. Thomas, and T. C. Kofane, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57(9), 2640-2647 (2018) doi: 10.1007/s10773-018-3784-5
    [79] K. V. Rajani, C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, A. Naveena Kumara et al., Nucl. Phys. B 960, 115166 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115166
    [80] B. Narzilloev, J. Rayimbaev, S. Shaymatov et al., Phys. Rev. D 102(10), 104062 (2020) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104062
    [81] Z. Stuchlík and J. Schee, Eur. Phys. J. C 79(1), 44 (2019) doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6543-8
    [82] J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972) doi: 10.1086/151796
  • 加载中

Cited by

1. Wang, S., Li, Y., Shen, S. et al. Production of leptons from decay of heavy-flavor hadrons in high-energy nuclear collisions[J]. Physical Review C, 2025, 111(3): 034912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.111.034912
2. Li, Y., Shen, S.-W., Wang, S. et al. Transverse momentum balance of dijets in Xe+Xe collisions at the LHC[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2024, 35(7): 113. doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01482-6
3. Chang, N.-B., Chen, W., He, Y. et al. Jet quenching and medium response in relativistic heavy-ion collisions | [相对论重离子碰撞中的喷注淬火和介质响应][J]. Scientia Sinica: Physica, Mechanica et Astronomica, 2023, 53(9): 290002. doi: 10.1360/SSPMA-2023-0166

Figures(12) / Tables(3)

Get Citation
Ke-Jian He, Sen Guo, Shuang-Cheng Tan and Guo-Ping Li. The feature of shadow images and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by different accretions[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac67fe
Ke-Jian He, Sen Guo, Shuang-Cheng Tan and Guo-Ping Li. The feature of shadow images and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by different accretions[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac67fe shu
Milestone
Received: 2022-02-20
Article Metric

Article Views(2433)
PDF Downloads(57)
Cited by(3)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Shadow images and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by different accretions

    Corresponding author: Guo-Ping Li, gpliphys@yeah.net
  • 1. Department of Physics and Chongqing Key Laboratory for Strongly Coupled Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
  • 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • 3. Physics and Space College, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637000, China

Abstract: In this paper, by exploring photon motion in the region near a Bardeen black hole, we studied the shadow and observed properties of the black hole surrounded by various accretion models. We analyzed the changes in shadow imaging and observed luminosity when the relevant physical parameters are changed. For the different spherical accretion backgrounds, we find that the radius of shadow and the position of the photon sphere do not change, but the observed intensity of shadow in the infalling accretion model is significantly lower than that in the static case. We also studied the contribution of the photon rings, lensing rings and direct emission to the total observed flux when the black hole is surrounded by an optically thin disk accretion. Under the different forms of the emission modes, the results show that the observed brightness is mainly determined by direct emission, while the lensing rings will provide a small part of the observed flux, and the flux provided by the photon ring is negligible. By comparing our results with the Schwarzschild spacetime, we find that the existence or change of relevant status parameters will greatly affect the shape and observed intensity of the black hole shadow. These results support the theory that the change of state parameter will affect the spacetime structure, thus affecting the observed features of black hole shadows.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • Since the concept of black hole was proposed, people have been trying to find this mysterious physical object in the universe. Recently, the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of M87 galaxy, which was captured by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration, is a strong proof of the existence of black holes [16]. A bright ring appears around a dark area in the image, where the dark area in the center is called the black hole shadow and the bright area is the photon sphere. It is commonly known that the strong gravity of black hole deflects light and forms the black hole shadow, which was also known as the gravitational lensing effect [7]. With the deepening of the study of black holes, people pay more attention to the observation of black hole shadows, because this will bring new insights and development to the study of black holes. There is a lot of research into black hole shadows under different gravitational backgrounds, such as finding extra dimensions through the black hole shadow characteristics, the gravitational lensing effect, the shape and size of the shadow for a rotating or non-rotating black hole, constraining the relevant parameters by shadow features, and so on [843].

      In our universe, real astrophysical black holes in galaxies are surrounded by a large amount of high-energy radiation material, which makes it possible to indirectly observe the black hole [44]. The accretion flow around a black hole is usually not spherically symmetric, but the simplified ideal spherical model can provide strong support for the characteristics of black hole observation. It is generally accepted that the shape of the black hole shadow has a standard circular geometry in a static spherically symmetric spacetime [45]. In Ref. [46], Bardeen pointed out that the radius of shadow for a Schwarzschild black hole is rs=3M, where M is the mass of black hole. Bardeen also mentioned that the shape of the shadow for a rotating black hole is closely related to angular momentum. In 1979, a simulated image of a black hole was shown for the first time, in which a black hole surrounded by an optically thin disk was considered [47]. For a model in which the black hole is surrounded rather by an optically thin spherical accretion, it has been found that the shadow is dependent on the geometric characteristics of the spacetime, and has nothing to do with the details of the accretion process [48]. However, the observed luminosity is affected by the accretion flow model [4953]. When an optically and geometrically thin disk accretion is located on the equatorial plane of the black hole, the observational peculiarities of the black hole shadow observed by a distant observer have been studied in Ref. [54]. Gralla et al. classified the trajectories of light rays near the black hole, whereby dividing the rings outside the shadow area into direct, photon ring, and lensing ring, and proposed that the observed intensity is dominated by the direct case. Furthermore, they also found that the size of the dark central region depends on the specific emission model of accretion flow. Using different accretion flow models, there is a series of interesting observable features about the shadow and rings of the black hole in other gravitational spacetime backgrounds; see Refs. [5565].

      Most often, the black hole has a singularity inside the horizon. However, in Ref. [66], a model of a black hole with regular non-singular geometry was proposed by Bardeen. In this system, an energy–momentum tensor is introduced, which is interpreted as the gravitational field of a nonlinear magnetic monopole charge. Since then, the physical properties of the Bardeen black hole has aroused people's interest, and involve a wide range of quasinormal modes, energy distribution, radiation, thermodynamic behavior and so on [6780]. Indeed, the study of black hole shadows can explore the basic physical properties of the spacetime. Therefore, it is necessary to study the shadow and observed characteristics in the context of the Bardeen spacetime. In this paper, we focus on the shadow and observed luminosity of a Bardeen black hole surrounded by various accretion models, namely the static model, infalling spherical accretion and optically thin disk accretion, which were regarded as the only background light source. By comparing the results in this work with the Schwarzschild spacetime, we can study the influence of the magnetic monopole charge on the shadow and observed characteristics, due to the charge parameter which has a remarkable role in the Bardeen spacetime. Therefore, this may provide a feasible method to distinguish the Bardeen spacetime from the Schwarzschild spacetime.

      The paper is organized as follows. In section II, we study the associated trajectories of light rays near a Bardeen black hole, as well as the radius of the photon sphere and the black hole shadow when the state parameters are changed. In section III, we analyze the shadow image and luminosity of the black hole surrounded by the different spherical accretion models. In section IV, we consider thin disk emission near the black hole, and compare the observed appearance with different emission profiles. Finally, we discussed our results and conclusions in section V. In this paper, we use the units G=c=1.

    II.   NULL GEODESIC IN THE BARDEEN SPACETIME
    • We would like to consider the spherically symmetric spacetime, with the metric of the Bardeen regular black hole as follows [66],

      ds2=A(r)dt2+B(r)dr2+C(r)(dθ2+sin2θdφ2),

      (1)

      with

      A(r)=12Mr2(g2+r2)3/2,B(r)=1A(r),C(r)=r2,

      (2)

      in which M is the mass of the black hole and g is the magnetic charge of a self-gravitating magnetic field described by a nonlinear electrodynamic source. Note that the spacetime structure could recover to the Schwarzschild spacetime in the case where g0. As mentioned in Ref. [67], the metric function can be approximated as

      A(r)12Mr+3g2Mr3+O(1r5).

      (3)

      It is clear that the form of the above equation is different from the Reissner–Nordström spacetime. The horizon of the Bardeen black hole can be obtained by

      A(r)=0,

      (4)

      where the largest positive root is the event horizon of the black hole. It is worth noting that the solution (1) is parameterized by the mass parameter M and magnetic charge g, so changing the specific magnetic charge g/M will directly affect the geometry of the spacetime. When the specific magnetic charge g/M<439, which is an important threshold for the existence of the event horizon, there is one unstable null circular geodesic located out of the event horizon. For the case g/M>439, there is no horizon; we do not consider this case in this paper [81]. A light ray passing in the vicinity of a massive object is deflected due to the interaction between the light and the gravitational field of the massive object. We can use the Euler–Lagrange equation to investigate the motion of photons around the Bardeen black hole, which reads as

      ddλ(L˙xμ)=Lxμ,

      (5)

      where λ and ˙xμ are the affine parameter and four-velocity of the photon, respectively. For the metric function (1), the Lagrangian L can be expressed as

      L=12gμν˙xμ˙xν=12(A(r)˙t2+B(r)˙r2+C(r)(˙θ2+sinθ2φ2)).

      (6)

      In the spherically symmetric spacetime, we discuss the motion of photons confined to the equatorial plane of a black hole [10, 45, 82], with the restrictive conditions θ=π2 and ˙θ=0. As the t and θ coordinates can not explicitly determine the coefficient of the metric equation, there are two conserved quantities E and L, representing energy and angular momentum, respectively. That is

      E=S˙t=A(r)˙t,L=S˙φ=r2˙φ.

      (7)

      For the null geodesic gμν˙xμ˙xν=0, we can obtain the orbit equation

      ˙r2+Veff=1b2,

      (8)

      in which Veff is the effective potential, which is given by

      Veff=1r2(12Mr2(g2+r2)3/2),

      (9)

      Moreover, b is called the impact parameter, which is the ratio of angular momentum to energy, i.e., b=L/E=r2˙φA(r)˙t. In the spacetime (1), there exists a critical impact curve with radius bp, for which the light along this curve will asymptotically approach a bound photon orbit. For the position of the photon sphere, the effective potential should follow the condition ˙r=0 and ¨r=0, which means [50]

      Veff=1b2,2Veff=0.

      (10)

      From Eq. (10), one can find the relation between the photon sphere radius rp and critical impact parameter bp

      rp2b2pA(r)=0,2b2pA(r)2rp3A(r)=0.

      (11)

      Indeed, the inner region of the critical curve is the shadow region of the black hole, that is, the critical impact parameter bp is the shadow radius that can be seen by a distant observer (ro). In the spacetime (1), changing the parameters M and g will directly affect the geometric structure. Hence, for the different values of the specific magnetic charge g/M, we show the different numerical results for the photon sphere radius rp, shadow radius bp and event horizon rh, as listed in Table 1. In order to reflect the difference between the Bardeen and Schwarzschild spacetime, we take the value of bp of the Schwarzschild case (g0), which corresponds to the value in Table 1, i.e., the shadow radius in these two spacetimes is equal, and show the corresponding physical quantities of Schwarzschild black hole in Table 2.

      g/M=0 g/M=0.1 g/M=0.2 g/M=0.475 g/M=0.6 g/M=0.7 g/M=0.75
      bp 33 5.18747 5.16108 4.98508 4.83975 4.67719 4.57212
      rp 3 2.99164 2.96617 2.7937 2.64674 2.47495 2.35745
      rh 2 1.99247 1.96946 1.80981 1.66546 1.47436 1.29904

      Table 1.  Values of relevant physical quantities in the Bardeen spacetime under different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, in which M=1.

      M=1 M=0.99833 M=0.99325 M=0.95938 M=0.93141 M=0.90013 M=0.87991
      bp 33 5.18747 5.16108 4.98508 4.83975 4.67719 4.57212
      rp 3 2.99499 2.97975 2.87814 2.79423 2.70038 2.63972
      rh 2 1.99666 1.9865 1.91876 1.86282 1.80025 1.75981

      Table 2.  Values of relevant physical quantities in the Schwarzschild spacetime under different values of mass.

      From Table 1, it can be found that all related physical quantities rp, bp and rh show a decreasing trend with the increase of specific magnetic charge g/M. In the Schwarzschild spacetime (g=0), the values of rp, bp and rh are larger than those of Bardeen case (g0). In Table 2, the shadow radius bp of the Schwarzschild black hole is consistent with that of the Bardeen black hole, but the corresponding photon sphere and event horizon radius of the Schwarzschild black hole are slightly larger than those in the Bardeen spacetime. In other words, although the shadow radii observed in these two spacetime are equal, the observed luminosity and appearance could be different, as the geometric structure of the Schwarzschild and Bardeen spacetime are different.

      With the help of introducing parameter u0=1/r, we can rewrite the equation of motion for photons, and use it to depict the trajectory of light ray:

      V(u0)=du0dφ=1b2u20(12Mu20(g2+1u20)3/2).

      (12)

      It is worth noting that the geometry of geodesics depends entirely on Eq. (12), which is a function of the impact parameter b. In the case of b<bp, the light ray is always trapped by the black hole and cannot reach infinite distance. In the case of b>bp, the light ray will be deflected at the radial position u0 where V(u0)=0, and then move away from the black hole to reach infinite distance. When b=bp, the photons are in a state of rotation around the black hole, neither falling into the black hole nor escaping. In the following sections, we further study the shadow of a black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretion flow.

    III.   IMAGE OF THE BARDEEN BLACK HOLE WITH SPHERICAL ACCRETION
    • From equation (12), we find that the trajectory of a light ray changes as we change the value of specific magnetic charge g/M and impact parameter b. Therefore, we simply describe the path of light rays under the relevant physical parameters, as shown in Fig. 1. In The red, green lines and black lines correspond to b=bp, b>bp and b<bp, respectively. When the value of specific magnetic charge g/M increases, the radius of the photon sphere rp decreases, as well as the event horizon rh. Furthermore, the deflection rate of light rays is different under the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M. This means that the light density obtained by distant observers is different, which naturally leads to a different observed intensity cast by the black hole shadow. When the value of bp is equal to that in Fig. 1, the trajectory of light near the black hole in the Schwarzschild spacetime is shown in Fig. 2. We found that the light trajectories and deflections near the black hole are different from the Bardeen case, which means that the appearance of magnetic charge g will lead to different observed intensity in these two spacetimes, even though the observed shadow radii are equal.

      Figure 1.  (color online) Trajectories of light rays for different values of specific magnetic charge g/M in the polar coordinates (r,φ), where M=1. Here, the black hole is shown as a black disk, and the red dotted line represents the position of the photon sphere.

      Figure 2.  (color online) Trajectories of light rays for the case g=0 (the Schwarzschild spacetime) for different values of M in polar coordinates (r,φ). Here, the black hole is shown as a black disk, and the red dotted line represents the position of the photon sphere.

    • A.   Shadow and photon sphere with static spherical accretion flow

    • For the distant observer, we want to study the observed luminosity of the black hole shadow, in which the accretion flow around the black hole is the only light source. We introduce two simple relativistic spherical accretion models, namely, static spherical accretion and infalling spherical accretion. In the background of the black hole being wrapped by static spherical accretion flow, we can integrate the specific emissivity along the photon path γi, and so obtain the specific intensity Iobs for the distant observer (usually measured in ergs−1cm−2str−1Hz−1). That is [8, 50]

      Iobs(ν0)=γigs3j(νe)dlprop,

      (13)

      and

      gs=νoνe.

      (14)

      It is worth mentioning that we focus on the case where the emitter is fixed in the rest frame. In the above equation, gs is the redshift factor and νe is the photon frequency at the emitter. In addition, j(νe) is the emissivity per-unit volume at the emitter, dlprop is the infinitesimal proper length, and ν0 is the observed photon frequency, respectively. In the spacetime (1), the redshift factor gs=A(r)1/2. For the specific emissivity j(νe), we consider that the emission is monochromatic with emission frequency νf and the emission radial profile is 1/r2, that is,

      j(νe)δ(νeνf)r2,

      (15)

      where δ is the delta function. In addition, we can obtain the proper length dlprop as

      dlprop=1A(r)+r2(dφdr)2dr.

      (16)

      Then, the expression of the observed specific intensity can be rewritten as

      Iobs(νo)=γi(A(r))3/2r21A(r)+r2(dφdr)2dr.

      (17)

      In Eq. (17), the total observed intensity Iobs(νo) as a function of impact parameter b. In addition, the change of a relevant physical quantity will directly affect the specific intensity observed by a distant observer. Taking the value of specific magnetic charge g/M=0.1,0.475,0.75 as examples, we give the trend of observed intensity with impact parameter b for the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M in Fig. 3.

      Figure 3.  (color online) Observed specific intensity of the black hole surrounded by static spherical accretion flow. Here, the black, green and red lines correspond to g/M=0, g/M=0.475 and g/M=0.75, respectively, and M=1.

      It is clear that the observed intensity increases slowly with the increase of b (b<bp), but increases rapidly near the photon sphere (b=bp) until it reaches a peak at the position of the photon sphere. After that, the observed intensity decreases with the increase of b (b>bp) until at infinity Iobs(νo)0. In addition, the larger the value of specific magnetic charge g/M, the stronger the specific intensity observed. For the case g/M=0 (the Schwarzschild spacetime), the peak of observed intensity is clearly smaller than when g/M=0.45 (or g/M=0.75). In other words, the observed intensity of the Bardeen black hole is stronger than that of the Schwarzschild spacetime, and higher values of specific magnetic charge g/M will enhance the light density, so that the observer can obtain more luminosity. The two-dimensional intensity map in celestial coordinates casted by the black hole is shown in Fig. 4.

      Figure 4.  (color online) Image of the black hole shadow with the static spherical accretion for different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, in which g/M=0 (left panel), g/M=0.475(mid panel) and g/M=0.75 (right panel). Here, we take M=1.

      In Fig. 4, there exists a bright ring with the strongest luminosity, which is the position of photon sphere. As a tiny fraction of the radiation can escape from the black hole, the inner region of the photon sphere is not completely black, and there is small observed luminosity near the photon sphere. Clearly, the maximum luminosity of the shadow image is enhanced with the increase of specific magnetic charge g/M, while the size of the shadow and the radius of photon sphere is decreased.

    • B.   The shadow and photon sphere with infalling spherical accretion flow

    • In the background of a black hole surrounded by infalling spherical accretion, radiating gas moves towards the black hole along the radial direction. Indeed, the infalling spherical accretion is closer to the real situation than the static spherical accretion model. Equation (17) is still suitable in the infalling accretion model, but the redshift factor is different from the static case. In the infalling accretion model, the redshift factor is related to the velocity of the accretion flow, namely

      gi=Kρuρ0Kσuσe,

      (18)

      and

      Kμ=˙xμ,

      (19)

      in which Kμ is the four-velocity of the photon and uμ0=(1,0,0,0) is the four-velocity of the static observer. Moreover, the four-velocity of the infalling accretion corresponds to uμe, which is

      ute=A(r)1,ure=1A(r)A(r)B(r),uθe=uφe=0.

      (20)

      Here, Kt is a constant of motion. For the photon, Kr can be obtained by the equation KμKμ=0, and consequently

      Kt=1b,KrKt=±B(r)(1A(r)b2r2),

      (21)

      in which the sign + or corresponds to the photon approaching or going away from the black hole. Hence, the redshift factor of the infalling accretion is

      gi=(ute+(KrKe)ure)1.

      (22)

      On the other hand, the form of the proper distance should be rewritten as

      dlprop=Kμuμedλ=Ktgi|Kr|dr.

      (23)

      Considering that the specific emissivity has the same form as in the equation (15), the observed flux for the distant observer in the case of infalling spherical accretion model is

      Iobs(νio)γig3iKtdrr2|Kr|.

      (24)

      Based on the above equation, we can also investigate the shadow and observed luminosity of the Bardeen black hole surrounded by infalling spherical accretion. Similarly to before, the observed luminosity distribution under different values of the specific magnetic charge g/M is given in Fig. 5.

      Figure 5.  (color online) Observed specific intensity of the black hole surrounded by the infalling spherical accretion, in which the black, green and red lines correspond to g/M=0, g/M=0.475 and g/M=0.75, respectively. Here, we take M=1.

      We find that the maximum value of observed intensity is still at the position of photon sphere (bbp). In addition, the observed intensity increases with the increase of impact parameter b in the region of b<bp, and decreases with the increase of impact parameter b in the region b>bp. However, the peak value of the observed intensity is much smaller than that of the static model, and the difference in peak value is more obvious under the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M. In other words, the black hole shadow with infalling spherical accretion is darker than that in the static case. A two-dimensional image of the observed intensity is also shown in Fig. 6.

      Figure 6.  (color online) Image of the black hole shadow with infalling spherical accretion, for different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, in which g/M=0 (left panel), g/M=0.475 (mid panel) and g/M=0.75 (right panel). Here, we take M=1.

      We find that the central region inside the photon sphere in Fig. 6 is evidently darker than the corresponding region in Fig. 4, and the intensity of the bright ring is far less than that with static accretion. The obvious difference between these two models is due to the Doppler effect, as near the event horizon of the black hole, this effect is more obvious. In addition, we find that the radius of the shadow and the position of photon sphere remain unchanged in the different accretion processes. This suggests that the shadow is an inherent property of the spacetime, and the behavior of accretion flow around the black hole only affects the observed intensity.

    IV.   SHADOW AND RINGS WITH THIN DISK ACCRETION FLOW

      A.   Behavior of light ray trajectories

    • In this section, we study the shadow when a black hole is surrounded by thin disk accretion in the Bardeen black hole, where an optically and geometrically thin disk is placed on the equatorial plane of black hole. The trajectories of light rays near the black hole are the important basis for studying the shadow and observed features of black hole. In Ref. [54], Gralla et al. distinguish the trajectories of light rays near the black hole, and they propose the total number of orbits which is defined as

      n(b)=φ2π,

      (25)

      which is a function of impact parameter b. Using equation (25), the trajectories of the light ray are divided into three types, namely, direct, lensing and photon ring trajectories. That is, there are not only the photon rings but also lensing rings outside of the black hole shadow. In the case of n(b)<3/4, the light ray will intersect the equatorial plane only once, corresponding to the direct emissions. In the case of 3/4<n(b)<5/4, the light ray will cross the equatorial plane at least twice, corresponding to the lensing rings. In the case of n(b)>5/4, the light ray will intersect the equatorial plane at least three times, corresponding to the photon rings. For the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, the range of impact parameters corresponding to direct, lensing rings and photon rings in the Baedeen spacetime is shown in Table 3. Also, we show the relationship between the total number of orbits n(b) and impact parameter b in the Bardeen spacetime in Fig. 7.

      g/M Direct Lensing rings Photon rings
      0 b<5.0267 or b>6.1927 5.0267<b<5.1893 and 5.2305<b<6.1927 5.1893<b<5.2305
      0.1 b<5.0049 or b>6.1623 5.0049<b<5.179 and 5.2196<b<6.1623 5.179<b<5.2196
      0.475 b<4.7564 or b>6.0446 4.7564<b<4.9717 and 5.0276<b<6.0446 4.9717<b<5.0276
      0.75 b<4.0769 or b>5.8461 4.0769<b<4.5142 and 4.6561<b<5.8461 4.5142<b<4.6561

      Table 3.  Regions of direct, lensing rings and photon rings corresponding to impact parameters b under different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, where M=1.

      Figure 7.  (color online) Behavior of photons in the Bardeen black hole as a function of impact parameter b in case of M=1. The colors correspond to g/M=0 (black), g/M=0.475 (blue), and g/M=0.75(red), respectively.

      In Fig. 7, we find that the same value of b may correspond to different regions under different values of specific magnetic charge g/M, as seen in Table 3. In addition, the values of impact parameter b corresponding to the photon rings and lensing rings are smaller than those in the Schwarzschild spacetime (g0), but the specific magnetic charge g/M leads to the increase of the ratio of the region occupied by the photon rings and lensing rings. When the impact parameter b increases to a large enough value, the light ray trajectories are the direct case no matter what the value of g/M is. That means, both the specific magnetic charge g/M and impact parameter b will affect the observed characteristics of the Bardeen black hole. In order to more clearly distinguish the distribution of light ray trajectories near the black hole, we show the associated photon trajectories for the Bardeen black hole in polar coordinates (b,φ) in Fig. 8.

      Figure 8.  (color online) Selection of associated photon trajectories in polar coordinates (b,φ), in which the red, blue and green lines correspond to direct, lensing, and photon ring bands, respectively. The spacing in the impact parameter is 1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000 in the direct, lensing and photon rings, respectively. The black hole is shown as the black disk, and the dashed red line represents the photon ring. The black hole mass is taken as M=1.

    • B.   Transfer functions

    • We consider that a distant static observer is located at the north pole, and the thin disk accretion at the equatorial plane of the black hole. Moreover, the light emitted from the thin disk accretion is isotropic for the static observer. In view of this, the specific intensity and frequency of the emission are expressed as Iemν(r) and νem, so as the observed specific intensity and frequency are defined as Iobsν(r) and νobs. By considering that Iemν/ν3e is conserved along a ray from the Liouville theorem, we obtain a correlation between the observed specific intensity and the emissivity specific intensity [55],

      Iobsν=(A(r))3/2Iemν(r).

      (26)

      Thus, we can obtain the total observed and emitted intensity by integrating for the full frequency,

      IO=Iobsν(r)dνobs=(A(r))2Iemνdνem=(A(r))2Iemν(r),

      (27)

      and

      IE=Iemν(r)dνem.

      (28)

      It is worth mentioning that this only includes the intensity of light emitted from the accretion disk, and the absorption or reflection of light and other factors are not considered. When the trajectory of a light ray passes through the accretion disk on the equatorial plane, a certain luminosity will be obtained, and transmitted to the observer at infinity. As discussed earlier, the different values for the number of orbits n(b) define the number of times that the ray path pass through the equatorial plane of the black hole. In the case of 3/4<n(b)<5/4, the light ray will bend around the black hole and intersect with the back of the thin disk after the first intersection with the thin disk. In this way, the light ray will pass through the thin disk twice. When n(b)>5/4, the light passes through the back of the thin disk and then through the front of the thin disk again, as the light ray is more curved around the black hole, i.e., the light will pass through the thin disk at least three times. Hence, the sum of the intensity at each intersection is the total intensity that the observer can observe, which is

      IO(r)=n(A(r))2IE|r=rn(b).

      (29)

      Here, rn(b) is the transfer function, which represents the radial position of the nth intersection with the thin emission disk, which means that the relationship between radial coordinate r and impact parameter b can be expressed by the transfer function. In addition, dr/db corresponds to the slope of the transfer function, which is called the demagnification factor. Actually, the slope of the transfer function reflects the demagnified scale of the transfer function [54, 55]. In Fig. 9, graphs of the transfer functions are given under the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M.

      Figure 9.  (color online) Relationship between the first three transfer functions rn(b) and b in the Bardeen spacetime, in which the black, orange, and red lines correspond to the direct, lensing rings and photon rings, respectively. The black hole mass is taken as M=1.

      The black line corresponds to the first transfer function (n=1), and its slope (drdb|1) is a small fixed value. This first transfer function corresponds to the direct image of the thin emission disk, which is the redshift of the source profile. The orange line corresponds to the second transfer function (n=2), for which the slope (drdb|2) is a very large value. Therefore, the observer will obtain a highly demagnified image on the back of the thin disk, which corresponds to the lensing rings. The red line represents the third transfer function (n=3), whose slope (drdb|3) is close to infinity (drdd|3). The observer will see an extremely demagnified image of the front side of the disk. The third transfer function corresponds to the photon ring. As a result, the observed luminosity provided by the photon rings and lensing rings only accounts for a small proportion of the total observed flux, the direct emission is the main measure of observed intensity. In addition, the image provided by the later transfer functions are more demagnetized and negligible, so we only consider the first three transfer functions.

    • C.   Observed appearance of Bardeen black hole surrounded by thin disk accretion

    • With the help of this preparatory work, we can further study the specific intensity of emission. For the form of emission, we mainly consider three different models. In Model I, the peak of emission intensity is at the position of the innermost stable circular orbit (risco). There will be no emission inside the innermost stable circular orbit, but there exists a sharp downward trend outside the innermost stable circular track:

      IE(r1)={(1r(risco1))2,r>risco0,r<risco

      (30)

      In Model II, we assume that the position of the emission peak is located at the photon sphere (rp), and the emission is a decay function of the third power:

      IE(r2)={(1r(rp1))3,r>rp0,r<rp

      (31)

      In Model III, there is a gradual decay of the emission between the event horizon rh and the innermost stable circular orbit risco, such as

      IE(r3)={π2tan1(r(risco1))π2tan1(rph),r>rh0,r<rh

      (32)

      Taking the specific magnetic charge g/M=0.475 as an example, the results for the intensity of the emission and observation are shown in Fig. 10. The left column is the trend of emission profiles IE(r) with the increase of radius r, The middle column is the relationship between the observed intensity IO(r) and the impact parameter b. The right column is the two-dimensional density plot of observed intensities IO(r) in celestial coordinates. The first, second and third row correspond to the emission Models I, II and III, respectively. As can be clearly seen from Fig. 10, there is a disparity for both the central black area and observed intensity in the different emission models.

      Figure 10.  (color online) Observed appearance of the thin disk with different emission profiles near the black hole, viewed from a face-on orientation. The value of specific magnetic charge g/M=0.475, and M=1.

      In Model I where the emission starts at the position of the innermost stable circular orbit, although the photon rings can gain more brightness from the thin disk, they are highly demagnetized. As can be see from the middle column, the observed intensity in the photon ring region is very small and confined to a narrow region. Moreover, the two-dimensional density map also shows that there is an almost invisible thin line in the photon ring region. Therefore, the contribution of the photon ring to the total observed flux is negligible. For the lensing rings, the observed intensity is larger than that of the photon rings, but the area occupied by the lensing rings is also very narrow, which leads to a bright line in the area of the lensing rings in the two-dimensional density map. As the result, the observed intensity obtained by the observer at infinity is mainly provided by direct emission.

      In Model II where the emission starts at the photon sphere, the emission regions of the lensing rings and the photon rings overlap, which resulting in a bright band outside the shadow as shown in the two-dimensional density map. The contribution of the lensing rings to the total observed flux is higher than that of Model I, while the contribution of the photon ring is still negligible. That is to say, the observed intensity obtained by the distant observer will still be determined by direct emission.

      In Model III where the emission starts from the event horizon of black hole, the observed intensity increases with the increase of b from the outer edge of event horizon until it reaches to the peak near the lensing ring. The photon rings and lensing ring completely coincide and cannot be distinguished. In addition, the contribution of the lensing rings to the total observed flux is partially helpful while the photon ring makes a negligible contribution, but direct emission continues to dominate the total observed intensity.

      The profiles of emission and observed intensities when the specific magnetic charge g/M=0.75 are shown in Fig. 11. By comparing Fig. 10 with Fig. 11, it can be found that the observed intensity, range of the central dark area and size of the light band outside the shadow are all clearly different. As the value of specific magnetic charge g/M increases, the range of the central dark area and size of the light band outside the shadow decrease. Moreover, the observed intensity obtained by the distant observer also decreases. As the proportion of area for the photon rings and lensing rings increases with larger values of specific magnetic charge g/M, the proportion of area from direct emission decreases relatively, which naturally leads to the weakening of observed intensity determined by direct emission.

      Figure 11.  (color online) Observed appearance of the thin disk with different emission profiles near the black hole, viewed from a face-on orientation. The value of specific magnetic charge g/M=0.75, and M=1.

      To distinguish the Bardeen black hole from the Schwarzschild black hole, here we have employed M= 0.87991 and plotted the shadows and light rings of the Schwarzschild black hole under the three models, as shown in Fig. 12. When M=0.87991 for the Schwarzschild black hole, the shadow radius bp is equal to that of the Bardeen black hole (i.e., g/M=0.75). In this case, if there is no matter, or only spherical accretions around the black hole, the size of shadow is exactly the same for the Bardeen and Schwarzschild black holes. However, by comparing Figs. 11 and 12, we find that with a thin disk the observed intensities (i.e., the middle columns for Figs. 11 and 12) for all three emission models are very different. For instance, the light rings observed in the Schwarzschild case are larger, due to the radius of the photon sphere and the event horizon of the Schwarzschild black hole being larger than those of the Bardeen spacetime. More importantly, the results show that for Model III the direct emission and rings all overlap for the Schwarzschild black hole, but are distinguishable in the Bardeen case. In addition, the intensities of direct emission and the rings are very different for these two black holes. From these facts, we can conclude that the shadows and rings could be an effective characteristic for distinguishing the Bardeen black hole from the Schwarzschild black hole, and that the magnetic charge g has a close correlation with the observed intensity.

      Figure 12.  (color online) Observed appearance of the thin disk with different emission profiles near a black hole in the Schwarzschild spacetime with M=0.95938, viewed from a face-on orientation.

    V.   CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS
    • It is commonly known that black holes are surrounded by accretion matter, and the distribution of accretion plays a key role in the imaging of black holes. In the context of the Bardeen spacetime, we have investigated the black hole shadow and observed luminosity under different accretion models. In particular, we pay close attention to the different observed characteristics for a distant observer when the related physical quantities have different values.

      When the black hole is surrounded by spherically symmetric accretion flow, we consider two behaviors of the accretion, i.e., the static and infalling accretion models. For the case of static spherically symmetric accretion, we find that the observed luminosity increases with the increase of the specific magnetic charge g/M, while the photon sphere and radius of the black hole decrease. In addition, the maximum observed luminosity always appears in the region of the photon sphere under the different values of specific magnetic charge g/M. From the observed intensity density map, one can see that the central region of the shadow is not completely dark, and the observed brightness of the central region increases slightly with the increase of g/M. In the infalling accretion model, the maximum observed luminosity is clearly lower than that of the static model, which is the most prominent difference between these two models. The Doppler effect for the infalling matter leads to this difference between the two kinds of spherical accretion. As a result, the observed image in the infalling accretion model is darker than the static one under the same state parameters. This change of observed intensity is more obvious when the specific magnetic charge g/M takes a larger value. The maximum observed luminosity with g/M=0.75 is about twice that of g/M=0 (Schwarzschild black hole). It must also be mentioned that in both spherical accretion models, there is a great difference in the observed luminosity, but the position of photon sphere and the shadow radius are unchanged under the same parameters, which means that the shadow is an inherent property of the spacetime and not affected by the accretion flow behavior.

      By considering the Bardeen black hole surrounded by a geometrically and optically thin disk accretion, we have distinguished the trajectory of light rays near black hole. Then, we take three different emission models for the thin disk accretion flow. For an observer at infinity (r0), there is not only a dark central area, but also the photon rings and lensing rings outside of black hole shadow. In the different emission models, the maximum observed luminosity and the size of central dark area are different. The thin disk serves as the only background light source. Light rays in the region of the photon rings can accretes through the thin disk more than three times, gaining extra brightness. However, the photon rings cannot be observed directly by the observer, as the photon ring region is very narrow and its image is extremely demagnetized. In addition, the image of the lensing ring region also experiences high demagnetization, such that the lensing rings can only provide a very small part of the total observed flux. Therefore, the observed intensity is dominated by direct emission in all three different emission models. Although these results are obtained with ideal models, it is very important to push forward the theoretical study of the black hole shadow as far as possible and lay the foundation for observed results.

Reference (82)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return