-
In ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions (HIC) at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), strongly coupled QCD matter known as quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is created, which exhibits many intriguing properties. QCD partons produced from early stage collisions may traverse through QGP, and its interactions with other partons in the QGP may lead to the attenuation of its energy, that is, jet quenching [1–6]. Among the convincing evidence of jet quenching effects is the strong suppression of inclusive hadron spectra at high transverse momentum (
pT ) [2]. Abundant experimental data from the RHIC and LHC on identified-hadron yields help us better understand the processes of jet-medium interactions and are well described within the next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD (pQCD) improved parton model incorporated with the higher-twist approach [6–11, 13]. Studies on the medium modification effect on different final-state hadron production in various collision systems are therefore essential for constraining our understanding of hadron suppression patterns [14–17].Suppression represented by the nuclear modification factor
RAA of different final-state hadrons,π0 , η, and ϕ, at largepT [18–20] provides useful information in many respects, such as extracting the jet transport coefficientˆq [21]. Moreover, the particle ratiosη/π0 ,ρ0/π0 , andϕ/π0 can help better understand energy-loss patterns. In our previous research on the production of different final-state hadrons in HIC [14–17], we concluded that the leading hadron productions in HIC are the combined results of three factors: the initial hard parton-jet spectrum, the parton energy loss mechanism, and parton fragmentation functions (FFs) to the hadron in vacuum. For instance, the derived yield ratiosη/π0 andρ0/π0 in p+p and A+A collisions coincide at largepT . This is due to the fact thatη, π0, ρ0 are all dominated by quark fragmentation contributions at very largepT in p+p collisions, and the jet quenching effect will enhance the quark fragmentation contribution fraction (with a relatively weakpT andzh dependence on their quark FFs, wherezh denotes the momentum fraction of the hadron h fragmented from a scattered quark or gluon). Therefore, at very largepT in A+A collisions, the relative contribution of quark and gluon fragmentations is small, and the particle ratiosη/π0, ρ0/π0 in A+A collisions will mainly be determined by the ratios of quark FFs to the different final-state hadrons, which is the same as that in p+p collisions. For the mesons ϕ and ω, gluon fragmentation contributions dominate at largepT in p+p collisions, and the particle ratiosϕ/π0 andω/π0 in A+A collisions vary from those in p+p collisions. The magnitude of this variation can help expose the difference between quark and gluon energy loss. Hence, in this study, we choose theπ0, η , and ϕ mesons as benchmarks to display final-state hadron yields in HIC. To achieve this, it is important to first investigate the amount of this variation in different nuclear-nuclear collision systems, which will introduce different energy densities and path lengths in the QGP medium. The emergence of experimental measurements in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV can facilitate such investigations [23] because they are conducted at similar colliding energies with Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV but have an intermediate-size collision system between previous proton-proton (p+p), p+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions [27, 28].The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The theoretical framework for leading hadron production in p+p collisions is presented in Sec. II, and the p+p spectra of charged hadron,
π0 , η, and ϕ production are plotted. In Sec. III, we deliberate on the nuclear modifications of leading hadron yields due to the jet quenching effect in A+A collisions. We subsequently investigate the nuclear modification factorRAA of charged hadrons andπ0 , η, and ϕ mesons as well as their yield ratios in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV. In Sec. IV, the scaled ratios of different final-state hadron production in the Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV system over those in the Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV system, denoted asRXePb , is demonstrated. A brief summary is given in Sec. V. -
Within the pQCD improved parton model at NLO [13], the inclusive cross section of single hadron production in p+p collisions is determined by two factors: the initial hard parton-jet spectrum
Fq,g(pT/zh) and the parton FFs to final-state hadrons in vacuum,Dq,g→h(zh,Q2) .1pTdσhdpT=∫Fq(pTzh)⋅Dq→h(zh,Q2)dzhz2h+∫Fg(pTzh)⋅Dg→h(zh,Q2)dzhz2h.
(1) where
Fq,g(pT/zh) is the convolution of initial parton distribution functions (PDFs) and partonic scattering cross sections, in whichzh is the momentum fraction carried by the final hadron of its parent parton at the fragmentation scale Q. In this study, the factorization, renormalization, and fragmentation scales are taken to be equal and proportional to the final-statepT of the leading hadron. CT14 parametrization [39] is employed for proton PDFs. KKP FFs [33] are utilized for bothπ0 and charged hadron production, AESSS FFs [35] are used for η mesons, and NLO Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolved FFs parametrized at the initial energy scaleQ20=1.5 GeV2 by a broken SU(3) model are used for ϕ mesons [29–31].Note that KKP parametrizations are chosen because, during our calculations, we find that the NLO theoretical results of
π0 production using the AKK08 [32], KKP [33], or KRE [34] FFs cannot simultaneously describe the experimental data from relatively low collision energies, such as 200 GeV, at the RHIC to very high collisions energies, such as 13 TeV, at the LHC. This predicament is also pointed out in Refs. [36–38], and the same occurs in the charged hadron and η calculations. However, when we focus on LHC energies, KKP parametrizations can effectively describe the experimental data for charged hadron production. KKP parametrizations are also able to describeπ0 production at all collision energies within a margin of error with a re-scale factor K. The same method is applied to AESSS parametrizations in η FFs to provide decent p+p baselines at all collision energies with a K factor.In Fig. 1, we present the numerical results of the final-state yields of charged hadrons,
π0, η , and ϕ at 2.76 TeV to 13 TeV and their comparison with all available experimental data [27, 41–50]. For charged hadron production, our calculation results agree well with experimental data [27, 45, 46] at all available energies in the margin of error when we fix the scales atμ=μf=μr=1.0 pT . For theπ0 yields [41–44], we utilize KKP parametrizations of FFs in vacuum withKπ0=0.5 and scales ofμ=1.0 pT . For the η yields [41–44], AESSS FFs with the rescale factorKη=0.6 are utilized when fixingμ=1.0 pT . ϕ production withμ=1.0 pT also gives a decent description of the ALICE measurements [47–50] as the collision energy reaches13 TeV. -
To facilitate the parton energy loss mechanism of final-state hadron production in HIC, we factorize the process into two steps. A fast parton first loses energy owing to multiple scatterings with other partons in the hot and dense medium. It then fragments into final-state hadrons in vacuum. The total energy loss is carried away by radiated gluons and embodied in medium-modified quark FFs with the higher-twist approach [6–11],
˜Dhq(zh,Q2)=Dhq(zh,Q2)+αs(Q2)2π∫Q20dℓ2Tℓ2T×∫1zhdzz[Δγq→qg(z,x,xL,ℓ2T)Dhq(zhz,Q2)+Δγq→gq(z,x,xL,ℓ2T)Dhg(zhz,Q2)].
(2) where
ℓT is the transverse momentum of the radiated gluons. Gluon radiation is then induced by the scattering of the quark with another gluon carrying a finite momentum fraction x.xL denotes the longitudinal momentum fraction, z is the momentum fraction carried by the final quark, andΔγq→qg(z,x,xL,ℓ2T) andΔγq→gq(z,x,xL,ℓ2T)=Δγq→qg(1−z,x,xL,ℓ2T) are the medium modified splitting functions [6, 7, 10, 11] which depend on the twist-four quark-gluon correlations inside the mediumTAqg(x,xL) ,Δγq→qg(z,x,xL,ℓ2T)=[1+z2(1−z)+TAqg(x,xL)+δ(1−z)× ΔTAqg(x,xL)]2παsCAℓ2TNcfAq(x);
(3) Δγq→gq(z,x,xL,ℓ2T)=Δγq→qg(1−z,x,xL,ℓ2T).
(4) where
αs is the strong coupling constant,fAq(x) is the initial hard parton-jet spectrum, andTAqg(x,xL)fAq(x)=N2c−14παsCR1+z2∫dy−2sin2[y−ℓ2T4Ez(1−z)]×[ˆqR(E,xL,y)+c(x,xL)ˆqR(E,0,y)].
(5) is proportional to jet transport parameter
ˆqR(E,y) when assumingx≫xL,xT [6–12]. The medium-modified FFs are averaged over the initial production position and jet propagation direction as follows [8, 9] :⟨˜Dha(zh,Q2,E,b)⟩=1∫d2rtA(|→r|)tB(|→b−→r|)
×∫dϕ2πd2rtA(|→r|)tB(|→b−→r|)טDha(zh,Q2,E,r,ϕ,b).
(6) where the impact parameter b and nuclear thickness function
tA,B are provided by the Glauber Model [54]. Then, we assume the total energy loss is the energy carried away by the radiated gluon.ΔEE=2Ncαsπ∫dy−dzdℓ2T1+z2ℓ4T×(1−1−z2)ˆq(E,y)sin2[y−ℓ2T4Ez(1−z)],
(7) which is also proportional to the jet transport parameter
ˆqR(E,y) . The jet transport parameterˆqR(E,y) depends on the space-time evolution of the QCD medium, and in our study, it is described by a (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc [51–53]. To take the initial-state cold nuclear matter effects into consideration, EPPS16 NLO nuclear PDFs (nPDFs) [40] are employed. Therefore, leading hadron production in A+A collisions at NLO can be obtained in a similar way as in p+p collisions so that NLO partonic cross sections are convoluted with NLO nuclear PDFs and are then convoluted with the effective medium-modified fragmentaion functions˜Dhq(zh,Q2) .The nuclear modification factor
RAA for single hadron production is defined as the ratio of cross sections in A+A collisions over that in p+p collisions scaled by the averaged number of binary N+N collisions at a certain impact parameter b,RbAB(pT,y)=dσhAB/dydpT⟨NABbin(b)⟩dσhpp/dydpT .
(8) where
⟨NABbin(b)⟩ is calculated using the optical Glauber method with a deformed Fermi distribution [54, 55],R=1.1A1/3−0.656A−1/3 fm,
(9) ρA(r,θ)=ρ01+exp(r−RA(θ))/a,
(10) RA(θ)=R[1+β2Y20(θ)+β4Y40(θ)]
(11) in which for
129 Xe, A = 129, a = 0.68 fm,β2 = 0.162, andβ4 = -0.003, andY20 andY40 are spherical harmonics [54]. The theoretical results ofRAA forη, ρ0, ϕ, ω, K0S production in central Pb + Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV are in good agreement with experimental data [14–17].In the upper panel of Fig. 2, the nuclear modification factor
RAA of charged hadrons as a function ofpT in the most central (0%–5%) Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV is plotted withˆq0=0.7−1.5GeV2/fm , which is extracted from theχ2/d.o.f fit in the bottom panel. The theoretical plots ofˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm effectively describe both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data. The bottom panel of Fig. 2 shows theχ2/d.o.f fit of charged hadronsRAA to compare the theoretical results at various values ofˆq0 with both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV, and the best value of the jet transport coefficient isˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm . Within the uncertainty ofˆq0=0.7−1.5GeV2/fm , the theoretical results exhibit a relatively small deviation from experimental data and are thus considered to be in a reasonable range. It is noted that thisχ2 fit is performed at a fixed scale, μ = 1.0pT , and theoretical uncertainties in nPDFs and FFs as well as from scale variations are not considered. Systematic and statistical uncertainties provided by the LHC are treated equally in our calculations.Figure 2. (color online) Upper: Nuclear modification factor
RAA of charged hadrons as a function ofpT compared with both CMS [27] (blue stars) and ALICE [28] (green dots) data in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV. The best value ofˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm is shown by the red solid line. Bottom:χ2/d.o.f calculations between theoretical results and both CMS [27] and ALICE [28] data ofRAA for charged hadrons in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN=5.44 TeV.Now, we predict the
RAA ofπ0 (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function ofpT in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV withˆq0=0.7−1.5GeV2/fm . The results are given in Fig. 3. The trends in thepT dependence of different final-state hadron species are similar, and we can naturally predict the particle ratios in Xe+Xe collisions. In Fig. 4, the particle yield ratiosη/π0 (up) andϕ/π0 (down) as functions ofpT in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV with the p+p reference (red solid line) are demonstrated. In the upper panel, theη/π0 ratios in p+p collisions are almost independent ofpT and remain constant at∼ 0.5, which is exactly the case at 200 GeV and 2.76 TeV calculated in our previous study [14].Figure 3. (color online) Nuclear modification factor
RAA ofπ0 (upper), η (middle), and ϕ (bottom) as a function ofpT in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV.ˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm is represented by the red solid line.Figure 4. (color online) Particle yield ratios
η/π0 (up) andϕ/π0 (down) in 0%–5% Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).The particle ratios
η/π0 (up) andϕ/π0 (down) as functions ofpT in Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV are plotted in Fig. 5 as a supplement. We find thatη/π0 in A+A collisions coincides with that in p+p collisions at largerpT , reaching a constant of 0.5 in Au+Au 200 GeV, Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV, Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, and Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions. This ratio is not affected by different choices ofˆq0 at higherpT . This is the result of the η andπ0 yields being dominated by quark fragmentation contributions at largepT in p+p collisions. The jet quenching effect will enhance the quark contribution fraction so that the ratio in A+A collisions remains the same as that in p+p collisions, which can be described by the ratio of the corresponding FFs in vacuum [14].Figure 5. (color online) Particle yield ratios
η/π0 (up) andϕ/π0 (down) in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV with p+p reference (red solid line).In the bottom panel of Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, the
ϕ/π0 ratio in p+p collisions is approximately constant at∼ 0.1 as the final-statepT increases. However, in A+A collisions, the ratioϕ/π0 slightly decreases with increasingpT , and the curves for A+A collisions are lower than those for p+p collisions. By comprehensively comparing the modifications ofϕ/π0 induced by the hot and dense medium created at different collision energies from relatively lower collision energies of 200 GeV in Au+Au collisions at the RHIC and 2.76 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC [16] to higher energies of 5.02 TeV in Pb+Pb collisions and 5.44 TeV in Xe+Xe collisions, the deviation between the two curves in p+p and A+A collisions is found to decrease with increasing collision energy in the intermediate and larger region ofpT . The mechanism behind these deviations is as follows: ϕ production at largepT is dominated by the gluon fragmentation contribution, whereasπ0 production is dominated by quarks in p+p collisions. The energy loss effect will depress the gluon contribution fraction and enhance the quark fraction owing to the larger energy loss of gluons than quarks [16]. -
Path-length dependence is a fundamental characteristic of the jet quenching theory, which describes how the energy loss depends on the length of a parton traversing the QCD medium. In October 2017,
129 Xe+129 Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV were measured by the LHC in addition to208 Pb +208 Pb collisions. At comparable collision energies (5.02 and 5.44 TeV), the system size was the main difference between Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions. It is interesting to directly compare the medium modifications of inclusive hadron production in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV and in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV systems. Because the p+p reference of the nuclear modification factors in both systems can be assumed to be approximately equal, a scaled ratio between the final-state hadron spectra in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions is proposed [27].RXePb(pT)=dNXeXe/dpTdNPbPb/dpTTPbPbTXeXe.
(12) where
dNPbPb,XeXe/dpT are the final-state hadron yields in Pb+Pb (Xe+Xe) collisions, which are scaled by the nuclear overlap functionTPbPb,XeXe=⟨Ncoll⟩/σpp obtained through the Glauber Model. The total cross sections areσpp5.44=(68.4±0.5) mb andσpp5.02=(67.6±0.6) mb. The radii of the207 Pb and129 Xe nuclei are≈ 6.62 and 5.36 fm, respectively [54]. With comparable collision energies (5.02 TeV and 5.44 TeV) and initial temperatures (502 MeV and 484 MeV, estimated by the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc), this observable has been proven by the CMS [27] to be able to experimentally expose the system size (path length) dependence of the jet quenching effect in hadron production in A+A collisions. We can see from Eq. (12) that to calculateRXePb(pT) , final-state leading hadron spectra in Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV are required.In Fig. 6, we plot
RAA distributions as a function of final-statepT for charged hadrons,π0 , η, and ϕ in Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV compared with LHC data [42, 46, 48, 56]. In the upper left plots, we present the case of charged hadrons; the theoretical plots within the uncertainty ofˆq0=1.2−2.0GeV2/fm can describe both ALICE [56] and CMS [46] data well, with a best value ofˆq0=1.5GeV2/fm . The same theoretical uncertainty inˆq0 is utilized to describe theRAA distributions ofπ0, η , and ϕ in the other plots of Fig. 6, where we find that the results ofπ0 and ϕ can describe ALICE data [42, 48]. This value is higher thanˆq0=1.0GeV2/fm in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV, correspondingˆq/T3 range with an initial temperatureT0 = 502 MeV at initial timeτ0=0.6 fm/c, and the central position is 1.6∼ 2.8 in Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN=5.02 TeV. This value in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN=5.44 TeV is 1.8∼ 2.6 with an initial temperatureT0 = 484 MeV. We note that the JET Collaboration found thatˆq/T3 has a dependence on the medium temperature T [21], and the baryon chemical potentialμB dependence ofˆq as well as jet properties such as the momentum of jet partons, mass, flavor, and the strong coupling constant is investigated in Refs. [25, 26]. Therefore, at different collision energies, initial temperatures, and nucleus radii, the extracted best value ofˆq0 is expected to differ. More experimental data will help us better constrain such an extraction, especially in Xe+Xe collisions.Figure 6. (color online) Nuclear modification factor
RAA of charged hadrons (upper left),π0 (upper right), η (bottom left), and ϕ (bottom right) as a function ofpT in 0%–5% Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV compared with CMS and ALICE data [42, 46, 48, 56].ˆq0=1.5GeV2/fm is represented by the red solid line.By comparing the results in Fig. 3 and Fig. 6, we find that the
RAA distributions of all four final-state hadrons in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions are slightly less suppressed than those in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV collisions, which agrees with the experimental observation of charged hadronRAA measurements by ALICE [28] and CMS [27].Now, we are able to demonstrate the scaled ratios
RXePb of charged hadrons,π0, η , and ϕ as functions ofpT in 0%–5%, the most central collisions in Fig. 7, with the experimental data points of charged hadron production provided by CMS [27], and the ratio of the p+p reference at 5.44 TeV over that at 5.02 TeV,(dσpp5.44dpT/dσpp5.02dpT) , is also plotted as the "scaled p+p reference" (dotted line), which represents contributions from the differences in collision energies. The scaled ratios of all four final-state hadrons are found at the best value ofˆq0 in both the Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb systems. The calculation results for charged hadrons agree with the experimental data within the margin of error. The predictions forπ0, η , and ϕ almost coincide with the charged hadron curve. The deviation ofRXePb from the p+p reference ratio suggests that production suppression in Xe+Xe collisions is smaller than that in Pb+Pb collisions and shows that a larger system size contributes more suppression to the nuclear modification factor, which is consistent with the comparison ofRAA in these two systems. We note that although cold nuclear matter (CNM) effects from nPDFs may impact particle yields at largepT in A+A collisions, their contributions toRXePb are negligible with the understanding that CNM effects largely cancel each other out where the scaled ratio is concerned.Figure 7. (color online) Scaled ratio
RXePb of charged hadron,π0, η , and ϕ production in 0%–5% central collisions compared with the CMS data on charged hadrons [27]. -
In this study, we predict
π0 , η, and ϕ yields in Xe+Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV within the NLO pQCD improved parton model by considering the jet quenching effect with the higher-twist approach. The jet transport coefficientˆq0 is extracted by fitting theRAA of charged hadron production with both ALICE and CMS data. The nuclear modification factors ofπ0 , η, and ϕ as functions ofpT are then predicted. Cases involving Pb+Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV are also provided for comparison. In all systems, we study from Au+Au at 200 GeV to Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV to Xe+Xe at 5.44 TeV. The curves ofη/π0 in p+p and A+A collisions coincide at a constant of 0.5 and show little dependence onpT ; however, the A+A curves ofϕ/π0 consistently deviate from their p+p references, and only the deviations exhibit a slight dependence on the collision energies. The nuclear modification factors ofπ0 , η, ϕ, and charged hadrons in Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV collisions are slightly less suppressed than those in Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV collisions. The theoretical results of the scaled ratioRXePb of final-stateπ0 , η, and ϕ coincide with the curve of charged hadron production, which can describe the CMS data within the margin of error, indicating that the path-length effect is independent of the species of final-state hadrons. -
We express our thanks to Dr. Xiang-Yu Wu for providing detailed profiles of the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model CLVisc and Dr. Man Xie and Guo-Yang Ma for helpful discussions.
