-
In rare semi-leptonic B-meson decays, there is a series of long-standing deviations between standard model (SM) predictions and the LHCb measurements [1–6]. In particular, the ratios
RK(∗) , which are defined asRK(∗)≡B(B→K(∗)μ+μ−)B(B→K(∗)e+e−),
(1) are predicted to be
RSMK(∗)=1.00±0.01 in the region1.1≤q2≤6GeV2 , withq2 as the dilepton invariant mass squared, within the SM [7–10], whereas the LHCb measurements in both 2017 [3] and 2019 [4] exhibited a deviation at the∼2.5σ level. Strikingly, the latest update of the LHCb measurement [5], withRK(1.1≤q2≤6GeV2)=0.846+0.042+0.013−0.039−0.012,
(2) has pushed the deviation to reach the level of
3.1σ owing to the reduced experimental uncertainties. This strongly hints at new physics (NP) beyond the SM that violates lepton-flavor universality (LFU).RK(∗) anomalies have prompted many NP proposals under extensive and intensive investigations (see, for example, the recent reviews [11, 12] and references therein). In particular, the two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) extended with right-handed neutrinos [13–16] is an interesting NP candidate because it can connect the intriguing LFU violation with neutrino masses – another big mystery in contemporary particle physics. Thus far, either Dirac [13] or Majorana [14–16] neutrinos have been considered to addressRK(∗) anomalies. In these scenarios, the dominant NP contribution toRK(∗) anomalies is assisted by the right-handed neutrinos running in the box diagrams that are most relevant for theb→sμ+μ− transition, and the resulting LFU-violating Wilson coefficients are predicted in the directionCNP9μ=−CNP10μ , which implies a left-handed NP effect in the muon sector and is persistently favored by updated global fits following Eq. (2) [17–29]. However, as noted in Ref. [15], the LFU-conserving Wilson coefficientCNP10ℓ,Z resulting from Z-penguin diagrams could contribute as much as the LFU-violating ones. Even though the LFU-conserving contributionCNP10ℓ,Z cannot explainRK(∗) anomalies alone, its comparable contribution can affect howRK(∗) anomalies are numerically addressed in the directionCNP9μ=−CNP10μ . Therefore, theoretical NP models with comparableCNP9μ=−CNP10μ andCNP10ℓ,Z should match a two-parameter global fit following Eq. (2) [24], which have unfortunately been neglected in Refs. [13, 14, 30].Many previous studies have focused on heavy Majorana neutrinos for the
RK(∗) resolution. Nevertheless, as found in Ref. [14], the solution ofRK(∗) anomalies in the directionCNP9μ=−CNP10μ is insensitive to Majorana neutrino masses below the electroweak scale. This implies that the difference between heavy and light Majorana neutrinos cannot be simply distinguished by theRK(∗) resolution. Besides Majorana neutrinos, topics with Dirac neutrinos have also received increasing attention in recent years, especially in connection with the phenomenologies [31–36] of big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) and cosmic microwave background (CMB), as well as the baryon asymmetry of the Universe [37, 38]. Dirac neutrino effects in theb→sμ+μ− process have been found, as noted in Ref. [13]. However, it was found that becauseO(1) Dirac neutrino Yukawa couplings are generically required to explainRK(∗) anomalies, thermalized right-handed Dirac neutrinos with such large couplings in the early Universe would cause an undesired shift in the effective neutrino number,ΔNeff=Neff−NSMeff , at the BBN and CMB epochs, where the SM prediction readsNSMeff= 3.044– 3.045 [39–45]. Nevertheless, the above conclusion depends crucially on how many right-handed Dirac neutrinos are thermalized in the early Universe and the decoupling temperature of thermalized neutrinos, which can result in different levels of theΔNeff shift.In addition to the extensive investigations of the heavy nature of Majorana neutrinos used to address
RK(∗) anomalies, it is also interesting to consider situations in which eV-scale Majorana neutrinos are included. In this paper, we consider NP effects onRK(∗) anomalies from either an eV-scale right-handed Majorana or a right-handed Dirac neutrino. Although the NP effects arising from these two cases are indistinguishable in terms of theRK(∗) resolution alone, their impacts on the early Universe are different in generating an observableΔNeff shift owing to the spinor nature of the neutrinos involved, that is, the Majorana spinor for the former and the Weyl spinor for the latter. Therefore, it becomes possible to distinguish these two solutions via the observation of differentΔNeff shifts in the cosmic regime.Noticeably, the extra radiation that generates a significant
ΔNeff shift is one of the simplest candidates to mitigate Hubble (H0 ) tension (see, for example, Refs. [46–50] for the latest reviews), which signifies a notorious discrepancy between the local measurements of the present-day Hubble parameter from the SH0ES collaboration [51–53] (based on the publication years, the three references are dubbed R18, R19, and R20) and the Planck CMB inferred value under the standard ΛCDM baseline [54],H0=(67.4±0.5)km⋅s−1⋅Mpc−1.
(3) The
H0 tension is further worsened by the updated SH0ES measurements (R21) [55], withH0=(73.04±1.04)km⋅s−1⋅Mpc−1,
(4) enhancing the deviation from the Planck 2018 data to
5σ . A plethora of investigations have introduced a shift in the effective neutrino number,ΔNeff≃1.0 , to addressH0 tension [56–59]. As illustrated in Ref. [58], an extra freeNeff beyond the original six ΛCDM parameters can cause a genuine shift in the central value ofH0 from Planck measurements, andH0 tension can be relieved withNeff≈3.95 . Here,Neff serves as an NP source to shift the ΛCDM predictions inferred from CMB, BAO, and Pantheon Supernovae Type-Ia data so that they are in agreement with the localH0 measurements. As opposed to estimatingNeff simply by combining the high-redshift measurements with localH0 data (like in many other studies), the data-analyzing method proposed in Ref. [58] opens a new avenue to easeH0 tension. However, such a large shift is disfavored by high-ℓ Planck CMB polarization measurements [54, 60–62]. More recent analyses have instead showed that a shift of0.2<ΔNeff<0.6 is able to easeH0 tension. For instance, Ref. [63] points out two possible regimes with/without BBN data,3.22<Neff<3.49(68%CL)for CMB+BAO+Pantheon+R19,
(5) 3.16<Neff<3.40(68%CL)for CMB+BAO+Pantheon+R19+BBN,
(6) in which the SH0ES 2019 measurements (R19) [52] are included. These patterns are also consistent with that observed in Ref. [64], where an additional electron-type lepton asymmetry
ξe in the neutrino sector is introduced, givingNeff=3.46±0.13(68%CL),ξe=0.04for\; CMB+BAO+Pantheon+R19+BBN,
(7) with a larger central value of
Neff than from Eq. (6). Intriguingly, the introduction of lepton asymmetry is also supported by the very recently probed anomaly in the helium-4 abundance [65], which results in [65–67]Neff=3.22+0.33−0.30,ξe=0.05±0.03.
(8) Note that all the central values of
Neff obtained above are larger than the previous CMB+BBN result [68],Neff=2.843±0.154 . Therefore, it can be inferred from Eqs. (5)–(8) that an increasedNeff will be helpful to mitigateH0 tension, though an updated analysis of the combined dataset from CMB+BAO+Pantheon+R21+BBN is currently not available. Other possible patterns, such as the extra radiation in the presence of additional non-free-streaming degrees of freedom (d.o.f) [69, 70], also found that comparableNeff values are favored to easeH0 tension. Recently, the mitigation ofH0 tension withΔNeff≃O(0.5) has been studied in several explicit models [62, 71–73].The results above suggest that a full resolution of
H0 tension could be a result of multidisciplinary interplay, in which the extra radiation serves a fractional but important role. In relating the observed anomalies in the particle physics domain, it is compelling to consider the situation where the underlying mechanism for theΔNeff shift is naturally provided by theRK(∗) resolution via an eV-scale right-handed Majorana or a right-handed Dirac neutrino, which motivates our present study. In this paper, we show that such a connection can indeed be realized in a flavor-specific 2HDM framework, where only one right-handed Majorana or Dirac neutrino has significant interactions with the extra Higgs bosons present in the model.The paper is organized as follows. We begin in Sec. II with a description of the framework, dubbed
tν 2HDM, and then consider in Sec. III the most relevant constraints from low-energy flavor physics, the perturbative unitarity condition, and LHC direct searches. In Sec. IV, we discuss the NP contributions toRK(∗) anomalies and the mitigation ofH0 tension. Then, we present in Sec. V our detailed numerical analyses of the viable parameter space for theRK(∗) resolution, as well as the correlation betweenRK(∗) anomalies andH0 tension. Conclusions are presented in Sec. VI. -
The 2HDM is a simple extension of the SM achieved by adding a second Higgs doublet to the SM particle content [74, 75]. Any specific 2HDM framework is characterized by its Yukawa interactions and scalar potential, both of which can be specified by either symmetry backgrounds or purely phenomenological considerations. For our purpose in addressing
RK(∗) anomalies with a link toH0 tension, we follow a data-driven approach. -
The two Higgs doublets
H1,2 in the model are constructed in the so-called Higgs basis [75, 76] asH1=(G+(v+ϕ1+iG0)/√2),H2=(H+(ϕ2+iA)/√2),
(9) where the vacuum expectation value
v≃246 GeV is responsible for generating the fermion and gauge-boson masses, andG+,0 are the Goldstone bosons. Here, we assume a CP-conserving Higgs potential [75]. Then,H+ and A are the physical charged and neutral pseudo-scalar Higgs bosons, respectively, whereas the neutral scalarsϕ1,2 are the superposition of the two mass eigenstatesH0 and h, which can generally be written asϕ1=hcosθ+H0sinθ,ϕ2=−hsinθ+H0cosθ,
(10) with the mixing angle θ determined completely by the parameters in the Higgs potential. Given that
cosθ≈1 is favored by current LHC data on various SM-like Higgs signals (see, for example, Refs. [77, 78] for recent global fits of the 2HDMs), which corresponds to the so-called alignment limit, we consider the case whereH1 is the SM Higgs doublet such that h corresponds to the observed Higgs boson [79, 80], whereasH2 is the NP doublet withH0 corresponding to the extra physical neutral scalar.In the alignment limit, the Higgs potential
V(H1,H2) can be readily constructed in terms of the free potential parameters governing the Higgs mass spectrum. In principle, these free parameters receive various theoretical and phenomenological constraints, such as vacuum stability, perturbative unitarity, electroweak precision tests, and collider direct detection [77, 78]. Nevertheless, the mass spectrum of the physical statesH+ ,H0 , and A is still undetermined by current LHC direct searches. In particular, a quasi-degenerate Higgs mass spectrum,mS≡mH0≃mA≃mH+,
(11) still remains a possible regime and is covered here.
-
To address
RK(∗) anomalies with a link toH0 tension, we consider the following Yukawa interactions:LY=LSMY(H1)+LY(H2),
(12) LY(H2)=−XuˉQL˜H2uR−XνˉEL˜H2νR+h.c.,
(13) where
LSMY(H1) denotes the SM Yukawa Lagrangian associated with the Higgs doubletH1 , whereasLY(H2) encodes the NP interactions related to the second Higgs doubletH2 , with˜H2=iσ2H∗2 , andσ2 as the second Pauli matrix. The left-handed fermion doubletsˉQL andˉEL are specified asˉQL≡(ˉuL,ˉdLV†),ˉEL≡(ˉνLU†,ˉeL),
(14) respectively, where all the chiral fermions
fL,R (f=u,d,e,ν ) are physical fields, with V and U representing the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) and Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrices, respectively. For the Yukawa matricesXu,ν , we propose the following phenomenologically viable structure:Xu,ij=κtδi3δj3,Xν,ij=κνδi2δjs,
(15) where
κt,ν are the only nonzero real effective couplings, and the flavor index s characterizes the one-flavor right-handed neutrino that couples to the muon lepton in the charged scalar current. It should be noted that the explicit right-handed neutrino flavor is irrelevant here and will simply be denoted as˜νR hereafter.Our proposal of Eq. (15) comes from various data-driven considerations. In the quark sector, Eq. (13) together with Eq. (15) would induce only neutral scalar currents associated with the top quark, and the charged scalar interactions,
ˉdL,iV∗kiXu,kjuR,jH−+h.c.,
(16) have only significant effects on the third generation of quarks owing to the hierarchical structure of the CKM matrix. These patterns comply with the current observation that only significant NP contributions are allowed in the third generation and the flavor-changing neutral scalar currents are severely constrained by experimental data [81–83]. In the lepton sector, however, Eqs. (13) and (15) would indicate that there are only neutral scalar currents in the neutrino sector, whereas the charged scalar interaction is only stimulated by the one-flavor right-handed neutrino
˜νR that has a significant coupling to the muon lepton, namely,κνˉμL˜νRH−+h.c.
(17) Such particular patterns closely follow the tight bounds from the charged lepton-flavor violating processes
ℓi→ℓjγ mediated by the right-handed neutrino at the loop level [14] and the muon decayμ→eνˉν mediated by the charged Higgs at the tree level. Furthermore, the reason for allowing only one rather than two or three flavors of right-handed neutrinos to interact with the muon lepton comes from the observation that if more than one right-handed neutrino has significant couplings to account forRK(∗) anomalies, the resulting parameter space will readily force them to establish thermal equilibrium in the early Universe and thus generate an unacceptably largeΔNeff shift [13, 32], as confirmed later in this paper. Finally, it should be emphasized that, because we are interested in the connection betweenRK(∗) anomalies andH0 tension via a minimal setup, other couplings not considered inXu,ν do not necessarily need to vanish, but rather they signify the meaning of phenomenological smallness in their own right. Furthermore, we are not concerned with the symmetry underlying such a flavor-specific Yukawa structure given by Eq. (15), though interesting possibilities, such as Branco-Grimus-Lavoura-based scenarios [84] and mass-powered-like textures [85], may deserve further exploitation.The above considerations result in our flavor-specific 2HDM framework that points toward significant NP effects associated with the top quark t and one-flavor right-handed neutrino
˜νR and will therefore be dubbed thetν 2HDM hereafter. As mentioned in Sec. I, the neutrino nature, being of the Majorana or Dirac type, is unspecified by theRK(∗) resolution alone. However, when˜νR is an eV-scale Majorana neutrino, its impact on theΔNeff shift will be different from that with a Dirac neutrino, especially when the shift is linked to the mitigation ofH0 tension. Furthermore, if˜νR is of the Majorana type, it can be embedded into the seesaw mechanism (see, for example, Refs. [86, 87] for recent comprehensive reviews), where two more right-handed Majorana neutrinos are introduced with the presence of a Majorana mass term,12¯(νR)cMRνR+h.c.,
(18) where
(νR)c=C¯νRT , andC=iγ2γ0 is the charge conjugation matrix. Then, the active neutrino masses are generated via the seesaw formula,mν,ij≃−v2MR,kYν,ikYν,jk,
(19) in the basis where the symmetric matrix
MR is already diagonal. Here,Yν is the neutrino Yukawa matrix fromLSMY(H1) in Eq. (12), that is,YνˉEL˜H1νR+h.c.,
(20) encoding active-sterile neutrino mass mixing and mixing-induced interactions via [88]
W∗ν,ij≃vMR,jYν,ij.
(21) An important observation arises if one of the sterile neutrino eigenstates is at the eV-scale, for example,
MR,1≃O(eV) . To avoid the constraints on active-sterile neutrino mixing [89], particularly for an eV-scale sterile neutrino [90], the first column ofYν must be strongly suppressed. Otherwise,Wν,i1 would be enhanced by a factor ofv/MR,1≃1011 . In the asymptotically safe limit,Yν,i1=0 , the active neutrino mass matrix from Eq. (19) would be of rank two, making the lightest active neutrino massless. Therefore, if the eV-scale˜νR belongs to the lightest sterile neutrino in the seesaw mechanism, the lightest active neutrino in the3ν oscillation paradigm [91] is essentially massless. Further constraints onWν,ij are not discussed in the following because the NP effects under consideration in this paper do not rely on the neutrino Yukawa matrixYν . If˜νR is of the Dirac type, however, the Dirac neutrino mass may also be generated via Eq. (20) but with the absence of the Majorana mass term given by Eq. (18). In either case, Eq. (13) will encode all the NP interactions concerned in this paper.In the following sections, we consider important constraints from flavor and collider physics, as well as perturbative unitarity on the
tν 2HDM framework, which is only characterized by the three free parametersκt, κν, mS, and show the viable parameter space in addressingRK(∗) anomalies. We further show that the resulting favored parameter space induces the shiftΔNeff≃1.0 in the Dirac neutrino case andΔNeff≃0.5 in the Majorana case. -
The
tν 2HDM framework indicates significant NP effects associated with the third generation of quarks and the muon lepton. In this section, we discuss the most relevant constraints on the model from low-energy flavor physics, the perturbative unitarity condition, and LHC direct searches. -
In the framework of low-energy effective field theory, the effective Hamiltonian governing the radiative
b→sγ decay at the scaleμb≃O(mb) reads asHeff(b→sγ)=−4GF√2V∗tsVtb[6∑i=1Ci(μb)Oi+C(′)7γ(μb)O(′)7γ+C(′)8g(μb)O(′)8g],
(22) where
GF=1/(√2v2) is the Fermi constant, and the terms proportional toV∗usVub are neglected in view of|V∗usVub/V∗tsVtb|<0.02 . The explicit expressions of the current-current (O1,2 ) and QCD-penguin (O3−6 ) operators can be found in, for example, Refs. [92–95], whereas the magnetic dipole operators are defined, respectively, byO(′)7γ≡e16π2mb(ˉsσμνPR(L)b)Fμν,O(′)8g≡gs16π2mb(ˉsσμνTaPR(L)b)Gaμν,
(23) where
PR,L=(1±γ5)/2 are the right- and left-handed chirality projectors.In the
tν 2HDM framework, the NP contributions to the Wilson coefficientsC1−6 are absent, and their contributions to the primed dipole coefficientsC′7γ,8g are suppressed by the ratioms/mb . As a consequence, the dominant NP influence on theb→sγ transition stems from the unprimedC7γ andC8g . After a direct evaluation of the one-loop penguin diagrams with the charged Higgs running in the loop, as shown in Fig. 1, we can obtain the NP Wilson coefficients at the matching scaleμS≃O(mS) [93–95],Figure 1. Relevant NP photon- (the first two) and gluon-penguin (the last) diagrams contributing to the inclusive radiative
ˉB→Xsγ decay.CNP7γ(μS)=√2κ2t4GFm2SENP7γ,CNP8g(μS)=√2κ2t4GFm2SENP8g,
(24) where the scalar functions are defined, respectively, by
ENP7γ=−7+12zt+3z2t−8z3t+6zt(3zt−2)lnzt72(1−zt)4,
(25) ENP8g=−2−3zt+6z2t−z3t−6ztlnzt24(1−zt)4,
(26) with
zt≡m2t/m2S , andmt is the top-quark¯MS mass.To evaluate the NP contributions to the branching ratio
B(ˉB→Xsγ) , we must run the Wilson coefficients from the matching scaleμS down to the low-energy scaleμb [96, 97]. Generically, the Wilson coefficientC7γ(μb) can be divided into two parts,C7γ(μb)=CSM7γ(μb)+CNP7γ(μb),
(27) which contributes to
B(ˉB→Xsγ) with a photon-energy cutoffEγ<1.6 GeV via [96, 97]B(ˉB→Xsγ)Eγ<1.6GeV=R|C7γ(μb)|2.
(28) Here, the overall factor reads numerically as
R=2.47×10−3 , and we neglect the small non-perturbative effect. The SM contributionCSM7γ(μb) has been calculated up to the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD [98–100], and the resulting numerical value reads as [101, 102]CSM7γ(μb)=−0.371±0.009,
(29) whereas the NP part
CNP7γ(μb) is given byCNP7γ(μb)=κ7CNP7γ(μS)+κ8CNP8g(μS),
(30) where
CNP7γ(μS) andCNP8g(μS) are already given by Eq. (24), and the magic numbers are evaluated to beκ7=0.457 andκ8=0.125 at the NP scaleμS∼O(1)TeV .By comparing the theoretical prediction given by Eq. (28) with the current world-averaged experimental data [103],
B(ˉB→Xsγ)expEγ<1.6GeV=(3.32±0.15)×10−4,
(31) we can set bounds on the NP Wilson coefficients presented in Eq. (24), and the allowed parameter space
(κt,mS) can therefore be extracted. In Sec. V, we apply theB(ˉB→Xsγ) constraint within a1σ uncertainty. -
Next, we turn our attention to the mass differences
ΔMd,s describing the strength ofB0d,s−ˉB0d,s mixings. The theoretical description ofB0d,s−ˉB0d,s mixings can be realized in terms of the low-energy effective HamiltonianHΔB=2eff=G2F16π2m2W(V∗tbVtq)2[5∑i=1Ciq(μb)Qiq+3∑i=1˜Ciq(μb)˜Qiq]+h.c.,
(32) where
mW is the W-boson mass, andq=d(s) for the neutralBd(s) meson. The explicit expressions of the four-quark operators can be found in, for example, Refs. [104, 105].In both the SM and
tν 2HDM framework, the only significant Wilson coefficient responsible for neutral B-meson mixing originates fromC1q(μb) , which corresponds to the four-quark operatorQ1q=(ˉbαγμPLqα)(ˉbβγμPLqβ),
(33) where the Greek letters α and β denote the quark color indices. The mass difference of neutral B-meson mixing can be expressed in terms of the off-diagonal matrix element,
ΔMq=2|Mq12| , with the latter given by [104, 105][Mq12]∗=⟨ˉB0q|HΔB=2eff|B0q⟩=G2F16π2m2W(V∗tbVtq)2C1q(μb)⟨ˉB0q|Q1q|B0q⟩.
(34) Here, the hadronic matrix element
⟨ˉB0q|Q1q|B0q⟩ encodes the non-perturbative QCD effect, whereas the perturbative contribution is absorbed into the short-distance Wilson coefficientC1q(μb) . Normalizing NP to the SM contribution, we can parameterize the theoretical prediction ofΔMq asΔMq=ΔMSMq|1+ΔNPq|,
(35) where
ΔMSMq denotes the SM contribution. For the NP scale ofO(1)TeV considered in this paper, the correctionΔNPq is given byΔNPq=U(0)(μW,μt)U(0)(μt,μS)CNP1q(μS)CSM1q(μW),
(36) where
U(0)(μi,μj) represents the leading-order QCD evolution function from the high-scaleμj to low-scaleμi [104], andCSM1q(μW) is the SM Wilson coefficient evaluated atμW≃O(mW) . Here, we take into account the threshold effect when evolving across the top-quark mass scaleμt≃O(mt) [104]. The NP contributionCNP1q(μS) is obtained by evaluating the box diagrams shown in Fig. 2, leading toCNP1q(μS)=CH−H1q(μS)+CH−G1q(μS)+CH−W1q(μS),
(37) in which the different parts are given, respectively, as
CH−H1q(μS)=κ4t8G2Fm4SI(zt,zW),
(38) CH−G1q(μS)=κ2t√2GFm2SJ(zt,zW),
(39) CH−W1q(μS)=2√2κ2tm2WGFm4SK(zt,zW),
(40) where
zW≡m2W/m2S , and we introduce the following scalar functions:I(zt,zW)=1−z2t+2ztlnztzW(1−zt)3,
(41) J(zt,zW)=−z2tzW(1−zt)(zt−zW)+ztzWln(zt/zW)(1−zW)(zt−zW)2−ztlnztzW(1−zW)(1−zt)2,
(42) K(zt,zW)=ztzW(1−zt)(zt−zW)−ztln(zt/zW)(1−zW)(zt−zW)2+ztlnztzW(1−zW)(1−zt)2.
(43) The current world-averaged experimental measurements are [106]
ΔMexpd=0.5065±0.0019ps−1,ΔMexps=17.765±0.006ps−1,
(44) both of which carry considerably smaller uncertainties than those of the corresponding theoretical predictions [107–110]. In particular, based on the bag parameters calculated in full four-flavor lattice QCD for the first time, the HPQCD collaboration found that [108]
ΔMSMd=0.555+0.040−0.062ps−1,ΔMSMs=17.59+0.85−1.45ps−1,
(45) in which the central value of
ΔMSMd is larger than the experimental data. This in turn implies a discrepancy for the ratioΔMd/ΔMs at∼1.7σ . However, an earlier computation based on the most accurate numerical inputs at that time found that [107]ΔMSMs=(20.01±1.25)ps−1,
(46) the central value of which is
∼1.8σ above the experimental one given by Eq. (44). Such a difference has profound implications for NP models that predict sizable positive contributions toB0s−ˉB0s mixing [107]. While the discrepancies observed inΔMd,s are not yet conclusive owing to the large theoretical uncertainties, it is interesting to note that an excess over the SM predictions cannot be reconciled with theRK(∗) resolution in thetν 2HDM framework because NP effects onΔMd,s are always positive, as shown from Eq. (37). Therefore, if confirmed with more precise experimental measurements and theoretical predictions, the discrepancy will entail additional NP sources beyond the minimal setup considered in this study.In view of the above observations, we apply in this study the HPQCD results for
ΔMd,s given by Eq. (45) as constraints but vary the uncertainties within3σ conservatively. We would like to emphasize again that the constraining power fromΔMd,s can be highly efficient only when the theoretical uncertainties from, for example, B-meson decay constants, bag parameters, and CKM elements are significantly reduced [107]. -
Besides the B-meson observables discussed above, the
tν 2HDM also has an impact on K-meson observables, such as the branching ratios of theKS,L→μ+μ− decays as well as the mass differenceΔMK and theϵK parameter ofK0 -ˉK0 mixing. However, because kaons are composed of two light quarks, that is, the up (down) and strange quarks, whereas NP interactions in the quark sector within our framework always connect with the top quark (see Eq. (15)), their leading contributions to K decays and mixing must first stem from one-loop diagrams with the top quark and charged Higgs running in the loop. This implies that the impact of NP on K-meson observables is suppressed by both the loop factor and these heavy particle masses, as well as the CKM entries involved.We explicitly evaluate the short-distance NP contributions to the branching ratios of the
KL,S→μ+μ− decays and find that they only result in a negligible effect on the branching ratios of theKL,S→μ+μ− decays, especially when the sign of the long-distance contribution is chosen to be destructive with the short-distance part [111–113]. We also check if the resulting parameter space of thetν 2HDM complies with the constraint fromK0−ˉK0 mixing. To this end, fixing the free parameters at a typical benchmark point(κt,mS)∼(1.0,1000GeV) , we numerically find a significantly weaker impact onK0−ˉK0 mixing compared with that obtained through a global fit study [81]. Thus, from these observations, we may safely conclude that K-meson observables do not place any significant constraints on thetν 2HDM compared with those obtained from B-meson observables.As a consequence, we do not show the constraints from K-meson observables in the numerical analysis below.
-
Let us now consider the constraints from the LFU ratios of the di-lepton decays of Z and W gauge bosons,
Γ(Z→μ+μ−)/Γ(Z→ℓ+ℓ−) andΓ(W→μˉν)/Γ(W→ℓˉν) , whereℓ=e or τ. For both of these two cases, by encoding one-loop NP corrections into the renormalized effective vertex in the on-shell scheme, we can readily derive the NP contributions to these LFU ratios.For Z-boson decays, the LFU ratio
RZμℓ can be parameterized asRZμℓ≡Γ(Z→μ+μ−)Γ(Z→ℓ+ℓ−)=RZ,SMμℓ[1+2Re(gSMV,Z⋅gμ,NP∗V,Z+gSMA,Z⋅gμ,NP∗A,Z)|gSMV,Z|2+|gSMA,Z|2],
(47) in the vanishing lepton mass limit. Here,
RZ,SMμℓ is the SM contribution, and the SM couplings are given bygSMV,Z=−1/2+2s2W andgSMA,Z=−1/2 , withs2W≡sin2θW≃0.23 [114]. It should be noted that the NP contribution to the electron/tauon mode is absent in view of the flavor-specific Yukawa structure given by Eq. (15). Given that the charged Higgs only couples to the left-handed muon (cf. Eq. (17)), whereas neutral scalars do not interact with the muon (cf. Eq. (13)), the NP contribution to the LFU ratio originates solely from theH+ -mediated loop diagram, as shown by the left Feynman diagram in Fig. 3. We explicitly arrive atgμ,NPV,Z=gμ,NPA,Z=−κ2νm2Zc2W576π2m2S,
(48) where
mZ is the Z-boson mass, andc2W=1−2s2W . Additionally, in the quasi-degenerate limit for the Higgs mass spectrum, as given by Eq. (11), the NP contributions to the decayZ→μ+μ− from the two neutral Higgs bosons H and A cancel out to a large extent, leaving the dominant NP effect from the left Feynman diagram shown in Fig. 3.For the W-boson decays, the NP effect arises from the right Feynman diagram shown in Fig. 3. The resulting expression for the LFU ratio
RWμℓ in the vanishing lepton mass limit can be analogously obtained by replacing Z with W in Eq. (47). The corresponding effective couplings are now given bygSMV,W=gSMA,W=1/2 , andgμ,NPV,W=gμ,NPA,W=κ2νm2W576π2m2S.
(49) Note that in deriving the above equation, we make use of the quasi-degenerate Higgs mass spectrum given by Eq. (11).
Then, by comparing the theoretical predictions with the experimental data [114, 115]
RZ,expμe=1.0001±0.0024,RW,expμe=0.993±0.020,
(50) RZ,expμτ=0.9981±0.0040,RW,expμτ=1.008±0.013,
(51) we can extract the bounds on the NP parameter space
(κν,mS) . To this end, we take the constraints as the experimental data within1σ uncertainties. -
In addition to the severe constraints from low-energy flavor physics, theoretical considerations, such as the bounded-from-below limit on the scalar potential and the perturbative unitarity condition of high-energy scattering amplitudes (see, for example, Ref. [75] and references therein), may also render tight bounds on NP parameter space. Here, we consider the vital requirement of perturbative unitarity for the Yukawa sector [116].
Generally, the perturbative unitarity bounds can be derived using the so-called partial wave expansion approach [117]. For the case of
2→2 scattering processes in the high-energy massless limit, the partial wavesaJfi with fixed total angular momentum J are explicitly defined by [117]aJfi=132π∫1−1dcosθdJμiμf(θ)Tfi(√s,cosθ),
(52) where
dJμiμf(θ) are small Wigner d-functions, withμi=λi1−λi2 andμf=λf1−λf2 characterizing the total helicities of the initial and final states, respectively, andTfi(√s,cosθ) are the invariant scattering amplitudes(2π)4δ(4)((pi1+pi2)−(pf1+pf2))iTfi(√s,cosθ)=⟨f|S−1|i⟩ , which are related to the S matrix viaS=1+iT . Here, θ is the polar scattering angle in the center-of-mass frame, and√s is the center-of-mass energy. By focusing on the elastic channels, that is,|i⟩=|f⟩ , corresponding to forward scattering with the same spin and internal variables in the initial- and final-state configurations, and restricting the sum over the intermediate states only to two-particle states, we can obtain from the unitarity condition of the S matrix,S†S=1 , the following reliable bounds on the tree-level partial-wave scattering matrices [116]:|aJ,treeii|≤12,
(53) which give a reasonable indication of the range of validity of the perturbative expansion.
To extract the best perturbative unitarity bounds from Eq. (53), we must then identify the optimal elastic channels. To this end, we must first obtain concrete expressions for the scattering amplitudes
Tfi(√s,cosθ) , which depend on the definite Yukawa structure and scalar potential as well as the underlying symmetry properties of the model under consideration. UsingTfi(√s,cosθ) , it is then straightforward to obtain the perturbative unitarity bound for each entry of Eq. (53) by performing the convolution with the Wigner d-functions and integration over the polar angle θ (cf. Eq.(52)) and then finding the eigenvalues of the partial-wave matricesaJfi . For generic fermionic Yukawa interactions, owing to the presence of different spin states in the scattering processes, this can be most efficiently achieved in the Jacob-Wick formalism [117]. However, the traditional method for calculatingTfi(√s,cosθ) relies on computing all the matrix entries, which becomes very involved and highly inefficient when the transition matrix has large dimensions. Recently, it was noticed that the determination of perturbative unitarity bounds in this case can be simplified by decomposing each scattering amplitude with different J into a Lorentz part that depends only on the spin and helicity of the fields involved and a group-theoretical part that depends only on their symmetry quantum numbers [116]. The only complication in the method is then attributed to the calculation of the symmetry factors, while the Lorentz parts are universal for different group structures [116].To obtain the perturbative unitarity bounds on the Yukawa parameters
κν andκt of thetν 2HDM, we employ the results derived in Ref. [116]. For the lepton part, which is characterized by the SM gauge groupSU(2)L×U(1)Y , the most stringent bound originates from the P-wave amplitude, that is,J=1 , and imposes an upper limit on the muon-related couplingκν .κν<√4π×(√5−1)≈3.94.
(54) For the quark part, however, the constraints are different because quarks carry an additional color quantum number under the gauge group
SU(3)C . As a consequence, the tightest constraint on the top-related couplingκt stems from the S-wave amplitude withJ=0 , which leads toκt<√8π/3≈2.89,
(55) and hence a more stringent bound than on
κν . -
In the
tν 2HDM framework, as the quasi-degenerate mass regime in the alignment limit is considered, we can see that theH0 and A decay modesH0/A→AZ/H0Z ,H0/A→H±W∓ , andH0→AA,H+H− are all forbidden, and the tree-level triple couplingsH0/A−V−V (where V denotes one of the gauge vector bosonsW/Z/γ and gluons) andH0/A−Z(h)−h are absent. This implies that for the heavy scalars concerned in this paper, their dominant decay modes are the top-quark and neutrino pair, whereas the di-boson modes are suppressed by the loop factor and, more importantly, by the mass ratiomt/mS [118]. Therefore, the decay width of the neutral scalars is approximately given byΓS≈Γ(S→tˉt)+Γ(S→νˉν)=mS16π[3κ2t(1−4m2tm2S)nS+κ2ν],
(56) where
nS=3/2 forS=H0 , andnS=1/2 forS=A .Currently, LHC direct searches for neutral scalar productions have been performed by ATLAS with a center-of-mass energy
√s=8TeV [119] and the CMS collaboration with√s=13TeV [120] in the channelpp→S→tˉt . In particular, the CMS results set model-independent constraints on the coupling modifiersgSˉtt between the scalar S and the top quark:LˉttS=−gH0ˉttmtvˉttH0+igAˉttmtvˉtγ5tA.
(57) The exclusion limits on
gSˉtt can then be translated into the allowed regions of thetν 2HDM free parametersκt,ν andmS . To this end, we must notice that the exclusion limits set by the CMS collaboration are obtained by assuming a fixed decay widthΓS , withΓS/mS=[0.5,25]% . However, as inferred from Eq. (56), forκt,ν∼O(1) andmS≳ , a ratio of\Gamma_S/m_S\gtrsim (4\%-5\%) is obtained. As a consequence, we only apply the two benchmark points\Gamma_S/m_S=10\% and\Gamma_S/m_S=25\% , selected in Ref. [120], to obtain a rough constraint on\kappa_{t, \nu} for a fixed scalar mass.More significant constraints on the model parameters have arisen from LHC direct searches for the charged Higgs performed over the past few years. Both the ATLAS and CMS collaborations have covered several decay channels of the charged Higgs, which are dominated by the
\tau\nu [121, 122] andtb [123, 124] final states. Recently, it was noticed in Ref. [125] that the\mu \nu final state can also be an excellent complementary discovery channel of the charged Higgs. However, a comprehensive search for such a channel at the LHC is not yet available, and thus there is no significant bound on NP parameter space from the decay. Specific to thet\nu 2HDM framework, the decay modes of the charged Higgs are dominated by thetb and\mu\nu final states, and the\tau\nu mode is suppressed under the flavor-specific Yukawa structure of Eq. (15), with the total decay width given approximately by\begin{aligned}[b] \Gamma_{H^+}\approx & \Gamma (H^+\to t\bar b)+\Gamma (H^+\to \mu^+ \nu) \\ =&\frac{m_S}{16\pi} \left[3\kappa_t^2|V_{tb}|^2\left(1-\frac{m_t^2}{m_S^2}\right)^2+ \kappa_\nu^2 \right], \end{aligned}
(58) where we neglect the bottom-quark and muon masses.
To obtain the viable parameter space of
(\kappa_{t}, \kappa_\nu, m_S) , we apply the latest results from ATLAS [123] and CMS [124] with\sqrt{s}=13\, \mathrm{TeV} , where the model-independent exclusion limits on thetb -associated production cross section\sigma(pp\to H^\pm t b) times the branching fraction\mathcal{B}(H^\pm \to tb) are obtained for the charged-Higgs mass at[0.2,~ 2]\, \mathrm{TeV} and[0.2,~ 3]\, \mathrm{TeV} , respectively, although the constraints from the CMS results are weaker than those from the ATLAS searches. For the theoretical prediction in thet\nu 2HDM framework, we calculate the cross section\sigma(pp\to H^\pm t b) using the computer program\rm{MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO} [126], with the charged-Higgs decay width given by Eq. (58). -
The right-handed neutrino
\tilde{\nu}_R with its interaction specified by Eq. (17) contributes to theb\to s\ell^+\ell^- process mainly via the box diagram shown in Fig. 4(a). Its contribution can be described by the effective weak HamiltonianFigure 4. (a): NP box diagram contributing to the
b \to s \mu^+ \mu^- transition, where only one-flavor right-handed neutrino\tilde{\nu}_{R} participates non-negligibly in the loop. (b):\gamma/Z -mediated NP penguin diagrams contributing to theb\to s\ell^+\ell^- transition.\mathcal{H}_{\rm eff}^{\rm{NP}} = -\frac{ G_{\rm F}}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\alpha_e}{ \pi} V_{tb} V_{ts}^\ast \left( C_9 \mathcal{O}_{9} +C_{10} \mathcal{O}_{10} \right) + \text{h.c.},
(59) where
\alpha_e=e^2/(4\pi) is the fine-structure constant, and the two effective operators are defined, respectively, as\begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \mathcal{O}_9 \equiv (\bar{s} \gamma_\mu P_L b) (\bar{\ell} \gamma^\mu \ell), \qquad \mathcal{O}_{10} \equiv (\bar{s} \gamma_\mu P_L b) (\bar{\ell} \gamma^\mu \gamma_5 \ell), \end{array}
(60) with the corresponding LFU-violating Wilson coefficients
C_{9\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} andC_{10\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} given byC_{9\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} = \frac{- v^4 \left| \kappa_t \right|^2 \left| \kappa_\nu \right|^2}{64 s_W^2 m_W^2 m_{S}^2} \frac{1- z_t +z_t \ln z_t}{\left( 1- z_t \right)^2}.
(61) Note that we neglect the neutrino mass in the above formula, and our result is consistent with that obtained in Ref. [14] within the vanishing neutrino mass limit.
In addition to the LFU-violating contribution given by Eq. (61), the flavor-specific Yukawa texture characterized by Eq. (15) also renders a considerable LFU-conserving effect on the
b\to s \ell^+\ell^- transition via the\gamma/Z -penguin diagrams shown in Fig. 4(b). However, the resulting contributions toC_{9\ell}^ \rm{NP} from the γ- and Z-penguin diagrams are suppressed by the factors\alpha_e and1-4s^2_W , respectively. As a result, the dominant LFU-conserving contribution originates from the axial-vector part of the Z-boson couplings to fermions in the Z-penguin diagrams, with the final result given by{ C_{10\ell, Z}^ {\rm{NP}} }= \frac{\kappa_t^2 v^2}{16 s_W^2 m_W^2} \frac{z_t \left( 1-z_t +\ln z_t \right)}{(1-z_t)^2}.
(62) It can be seen from Eqs. (61) and (62) that for
\kappa_{t, \nu} \sim \mathcal{O}(1) andm_S \sim \mathcal{O}(1)\, \mathrm{TeV} , the LFU-violating coefficientsC_{9\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} numerically have the same order of magnitude as the LFU-conserving oneC_{10\ell, Z}^ \rm{NP} . Interestingly, this observation is also favored by the two-parameter fit for theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution [24],\begin{array}{*{20}{l}} C_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = - C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} =-0.53 \pm 0.10 , \qquad C_{10\ell, Z}^{\rm{NP}} = -0.24\pm 0.20, \end{array}
(63) obtained at the
1\sigma level. While a negative central value of the LFU-conserving coefficientC_{10\ell, Z}^{\rm{NP}} is, by itself, not helpful for explainingR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies, it can change the direction of the LFU-violating coefficientsC_{9\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}} and, in particular, liftC_{9\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}}(=-C_{10\mu}^{\mathrm{NP}}) to a larger negative value compared to the one-parameter fits obtained in Refs. [18–28]. Translated to the parameter space in thet\nu 2HDM framework, this requires larger\kappa_{t, \nu} and/or a lighter scalar massm_S to explain theR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies. -
As can be inferred from the previous studies in Refs. [13–16], an
\mathcal{O}(1) \kappa_\nu is generally required to explainR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies. Specific to thet\nu 2HDM framework, such a large coupling will readily help the right-handed neutrino\tilde \nu_R establish thermal equilibrium with the SM plasma via the Higgs doublet portalH_2 . When the temperature T drops below the muon mass, the effective four-fermion interaction governing the right-handed neutrino annihilation rate,\Gamma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}\equiv \Gamma (\tilde{\nu}_{R} \bar{\tilde\nu}_{R} \to\nu_L \bar{\nu}_L) , mediated by neutral scalars will determine the decoupling temperatureT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} of\tilde{\nu}_R . Because\tilde\nu_R is relativistic in the early Universe, its contribution to Hubble expansion can be parameterized by a shift in the effective neutrino number [31–35],\Delta N_{\rm eff} = N_{\tilde{\nu}} \frac{g_{\tilde{\nu}}} {2}\left( \frac{10.75}{g^s_\ast (T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec})} \right)^{4/3}.
(64) Here,
N_{\tilde{\nu}}=1 denotes the number of thermalized right-handed neutrino species, andg_{\tilde{\nu}} =2 takes into account the antiparticle state of the right-handed Dirac neutrino, andg_{\tilde{\nu}}=1 for the right-handed Majorana neutrino. The effective d.o.f for the SM entropy density,g^s_\ast (T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) , is evaluated at the decoupling temperatureT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} of\tilde{\nu}_R , which can be estimated via the instantaneous decoupling condition\Gamma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}\simeq H(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) , with the Hubble expansion rate given at the radiation-dominated epoch byH (T) = \sqrt{\frac{4\pi^3 g_\ast^\rho(T)}{45M_{P}^2}}\, T^2,
(65) where the effective d.o.f for the energy density is taken approximately as
g_*\equiv g_\ast^\rho \approx g_\ast^s , and the Planck mass is given byM_{P} =1.22\times 10^{19}\, \mathrm{GeV} .The annihilation rate of the process
\tilde{\nu}_{R} \bar{\tilde\nu}_{R} \to\nu_L \bar{\nu}_L has the structure\begin{array}{*{20}{l}} \Gamma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}= \dfrac{g_{\tilde{\nu}}}{2} \langle\sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} |v_{\tilde{\nu}_{R}}-v_{\bar{\tilde\nu}_{R}}|\rangle n_{\tilde\nu}, \end{array}
(66) where
|v_{\tilde{\nu}_{R}}-v_{\bar{\tilde\nu}_{R}}| is the relative velocity of the two incoming particles,g_{\tilde{\nu}}/2 is introduced to signify the symmetry factor due to the indistinguishability between the particle and antiparticle in the initial state, andn_{\tilde{\nu}} is the thermal particle number density of\tilde{\nu}_R , given byn_{\tilde\nu}=\frac{3\zeta(3)}{4\pi^2}T^3.
(67) Here, note that the spin d.o.f of the right-handed neutrino
\tilde{\nu}_R is equal to one for both the chiral Dirac and Majorana neutrinos. The thermal rate\langle\sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} |v_{\tilde{\nu}_{R}}-v_{\bar{\tilde\nu}_{R}}|\rangle in Eq. (66) is given by\begin{aligned}[b] \langle\sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} |v_{\tilde{\nu}_{R}}-v_{\bar{\tilde\nu}_{R}}|\rangle &\equiv \frac{\int {\rm d} n^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}(p_1) {\rm d} n^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}} (p_2)\, \sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} |v_{\tilde{\nu}_{R}}-v_{\bar{\tilde\nu}_{R}}|}{\int {\rm d} n^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}(p_1) {\rm d} n^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}(p_2)} \\ &=\frac{T}{32\pi^4 n_{\tilde\nu}^2}\int _{0}^\infty {\rm d} \hat s\, \sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}\, \hat{s}^{3/2}\, K_1(\sqrt{\hat s}/T), \end{aligned}
(68) where
K_1(x) is the modified Bessel function of order one, and the phase-space factor is defined by{\rm d}n^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}(p_i)=\frac{{\rm d}^3p_i }{(2\pi)^3} f^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}(p_i).
(69) Within the
t\nu 2HDM framework, the annihilation cross section\sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} is simply given by\sigma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}= \frac{\kappa_\nu^4 }{192\pi m_S^4}\hat{s},
(70) where
\sqrt{\hat s}=E_{\rm cm} is the center-of-mass energy. Finally, we obtain the annihilation rate of the process\tilde{\nu}_{R} \bar{\tilde\nu}_{R} \to\nu_L \bar{\nu}_L ,\Gamma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu} =\frac{g_{\tilde{\nu}}}{2}\frac{\kappa_\nu^4}{6\zeta (3) \pi^3} \frac{T^5}{m_S^4},
(71) which, together with the instantaneous decoupling condition
\Gamma_{2\tilde{\nu}\to 2\nu}\simeq H(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) and Eq. (65), leads to the decoupling temperature\begin{aligned}[b] \left(\frac{T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}}{\mathrm{MeV}}\right)\simeq & 4.25 \left(\frac{2}{g_{\tilde{\nu}}}\right)^{1/3} \left(\frac{g_*(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec})}{10.75}\right)^{1/6}\\&\times\left(\frac{3}{\kappa_{\nu}}\right)^{4/3}\left(\frac{m_S}{500\, \mathrm{GeV}}\right)^{4/3}. \end{aligned}
(72) It should be mentioned that, to obtain the analytic thermal rate, as given by Eq. (68), we use the Boltzmann distribution
f^{\rm eq}_{\tilde{\nu}}={\rm e}^{-E/T} . Because the dependence of the d.o.fg_*^s(T) on the decoupling temperatureT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} is weak below the muon mass scaleT<m_\mu [127], the effective neutrino number shift\Delta N_{\rm eff} will also have a weak dependence onT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} . Therefore, the approximation of adopting the Boltzmann distribution is sufficient to estimate the scale ofT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} from Eq. (72).From Eq. (72), one can see that the decoupling temperature
T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} will be solely determined by the free parameters\kappa_\nu andm_S after inserting the effective d.o.fg_*(T) as a function of the temperature [127]. This in turn implies that the effective d.o.fg_*^s(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) present in Eq. (64) and hence the effective neutrino number shift\Delta N_{\rm eff} are also determined by the two parameters\kappa_\nu andm_S . However, given that the parameter\kappa_t is severely constrained by low-energy flavor physics (especially by the mass differences\Delta M_q ), we know that\kappa_{\nu} becomes the key parameter for theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution. Therefore, we can expect a potential correlation between theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution and the mitigation ofH_0 tension achieved via the effective neutrino number shift given by Eq. (64) within thet\nu 2HDM framework proposed here. -
Let us begin with the exploration of the NP parameter space allowed by
R_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies. By fixing the quasi-degenerate Higgs mass atm_S = 500 ,700 ,900 , and1200~{\mathrm{GeV}} , we show in Fig. 5 the viable parameter regions in the(\kappa_\nu, \kappa_t) plane, under the perturbative unitarity bounds given in Eqs. (54) and (55). We also take into account all the relevant phenomenological constraints discussed in Sec. III. Explicitly, the regions above the various curves in Fig. 5 are already excluded by the branching ratio\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}\to X_s\gamma) (red), mass differences\Delta M_s (orange), and\Delta M_d (magenta), as well as by direct searches for the charged Higgs from ATLAS with13\, \mathrm{TeV} (blue). In the upper two plots, we also show the correlation between\kappa_t and\kappa_\nu inferred from the CMS direct searches for neutral scalars, with the two benchmark points of the decay width over mass ratio,\Gamma_S/m_S = 10\% (black dashed) and\Gamma_S/m_S = 25\% (black solid). Because the LFU ratios of the di-lepton decays ofZ/W gauge bosons do not impose any further significant constraints in the(\kappa_\nu, \kappa_t) plane under the perturbative unitarity bounds, they are not displayed in Fig. 5. Finally, the bands colored from dark to light green represent the regions allowed by theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution in the direction ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} at1-3\sigma , whereas the band in yellow denotes the1\sigma region ofC_{10\ell, Z}^{\rm NP} , as given in Eq. (63).Figure 5. (color online) Viable parameter space in the
(\kappa_\nu, \kappa_t) plane for theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution, with the Higgs mass fixed atm_S = 500 ,700 ,900 , and1200~ {\mathrm{GeV}} . The green and yellow bands represent the regions allowed by the two-parameter fits [24] in the direction ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} andC_{10\ell, Z}^{\rm NP} , as given by Eq. (63). We also take into account all the relevant constraints discussed in the previous two sections; see text for further details.From Fig. 5, it can be readily seen that the most stringent bound in the quark sector originates from the mass differences
\Delta M_q and, in particular, from\Delta M_d , which in turn requires\kappa_\nu\simeq 3 for theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution. However, as mentioned in Sec. III.A.2, the\Delta M_q constraints may not be so conclusive owing to the large theoretical uncertainties. It should also be pointed out that if the\Delta M_q discrepancies observed in Sec. III.A.2 are confirmed in the future, we will have to introduce extra NP sources beyond the minimalt\nu 2HDM setup considered here. In such a special case, the constraints from\Delta M_s (orange) and\Delta M_d (magenta) may become irrelevant. However, form_S = 500 andm_S = 700~ {\mathrm{GeV}} , the two black curves inferred from the CMS direct searches for neutral scalars should be interpreted as the maximal values of\kappa_t under the reference values of\kappa_\nu . For instance, with\kappa_\nu\approx2 ,\kappa_t>0.97 will be excluded by the limits set by the CMS direct searches for the processpp\to S\to t \bar t [120]. Furthermore, for the benchmark point\Gamma_S/m_S = 10\% andm_S=500~ \mathrm{GeV} , the constraint on\kappa_t from the CMS neutral-scalar searches is tighter than that from the charged-Higgs bound set by the ATLAS collaboration with13\, \mathrm{TeV} [123], whereas for\Gamma_S/m_S up to25\% andm_S=700~ \mathrm{GeV} , the upper limit on\kappa_t is still determined by the CMS neutral-scalar searches. However, we must note that the CMS constraints are no longer applicable form_S > 750~ \mathrm{GeV} [120].In the next subsection, we show that a large muon-related coupling
\kappa_\nu , as required by theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution, is necessary for generating a significant contribution to the\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift. In this respect, we conclude that thet\nu 2HDM framework provides us with an opportunity to correlate theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution with the mitigation ofH_0 tension. -
To visualize the potential correlation between the
R_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution and the mitigation ofH_0 tension achieved via the\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift, we start with Eq. (64), where the effective d.o.fg_*^s(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) is solely determined by the free parameters\kappa_\nu andm_S within our approximation. The LFU-violating Wilson coefficientsC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} in Eq. (61) can then be expressed in terms of\kappa_t ,m_S , and\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} . By fixing the scalar massm_S and varying the parameter\kappa_t from zero up to the values allowed by the\Delta M_q constraints, we can finally obtain the numerical dependence ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} on\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} , which is shown in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) form_S = 500 andm_S = 1000~ {\mathrm{GeV}} , respectively. The horizontal bands colored from dark to light green correspond to the global-fit results ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} at the1- 3\sigma level, as given in Eq. (63). The blue (red) region corresponds to the viable parameter space in the Dirac (Majorana) neutrino case, in which the peak ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} corresponds to the upper limit on\kappa_{\nu} , as required by the perturbative unitarity bound (see Eq. (54)).Figure 6. (color online) Induced ranges of
C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}}=-C_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} for given values of\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} , with the parameter\kappa_t varied from zero up to the values allowed by the\Delta M_q constraints, and the scalar mass fixed atm_S = 500~{\mathrm{GeV}} (a) andm_S = 1000~ {\mathrm{GeV}} (b). The regions in blue and red correspond to the Dirac and Majorana natures of the right-handed neutrino, respectively. The horizontal bands in green correspond to the global-fit results ofC_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}}(=-C_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}}) at the1- 3\sigma level, as given in Eq. (63).From Fig. 6, it can be clearly seen that the resolution of
R_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies at the1\sigma level requires the shift\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} \simeq 1.0 for a one-flavor right-handed Dirac neutrino and\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} \simeq 0.5 for a one-flavor right-handed Majorana neutrino, and any large or moderate deviation from the benchmark points of\Delta N_{\rm eff} , although able to easeH_0 tension, cannot simultaneously resolve theR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies. In both cases, after fixing the Higgs mass, a large effective\Delta N_{\rm eff} is always required by a value\kappa_\nu \simeq 3 that almost coincides with the perturbative unitarity limit, and varying the value of\kappa_t only influences the Wilson coefficientsC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} . Moreover, by comparing the two figures, we can find that increasing the Higgs mass will enlarge the viable space of\Delta N_{\rm eff} and simultaneously shrink the range ofC_{9\mu}^{\rm{NP}} = -C_{10\mu}^{\rm{NP}} . This indicates a preference of a lighter Higgs to addressR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies while easingH_0 tension. In addition, such a difference between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos is expected owing to the different spinor natures of the neutrinos involved, that is, the Weyl spinor for the former and the Majorana spinor for the latter case. In terms of the favored\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shifts inferred from Eqs. (5)–(8), we can then conclude that the eV-scale Majorana neutrino embedded in thet\nu 2HDM framework is able to addressR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies and simultaneously easeH_0 tension, whereas the case with the one-flavor Dirac neutrino generates too large a\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift.Finally, it can be demonstrated that, if more than one neutrino contributes to
R_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies via the box diagram shown in Fig. 4(a), the resulting\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift would be unacceptably large. As an example, let us consider the case in which there are two right-handed neutrinos with significant couplings to the muon lepton in Eq. (13). We must sum over the two flavors of\nu_R in Eq. (61), that is,|\kappa_\nu|^2\to |\kappa_{\nu, 1}|^2+|\kappa_{\nu, 2}|^2 . Assuming that\kappa_{\nu, 1}\sim \kappa_{\nu, 2} and applying our previous finding of\kappa_\nu\simeq 3 for theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution, as inferred from Fig. 5, we can see that\kappa_{\nu, 1}\sim \kappa_{\nu, 2}\sim \mathcal{O}(3/\sqrt{2}) are required in this case. This means that the muon-related couplings\kappa_\nu can be reduced by a factor of1/\sqrt{2} when explainingR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies with two right-handed neutrinos. However, such a parameter reduction cannot cause any significant increase in the decoupling temperature and, more importantly, any significant increase in the effective d.o.fg_*(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) in Eq. (72). This can be understood by the fact that enhancingT_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec} by a factor of2^{2/3} can only increaseg_*(T_{\tilde{\nu}, \rm dec}) by approximately10\% [127]. From Eq. (64), we can see that the\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift is basically determined by the number of thermalized right-handed neutrino species. As a consequence, the correlation shown in Fig. 6 indicates that theR_{K^{(\ast)}} resolution with more than one thermalized right-handed neutrino would introduce a large\Delta N_{\rm{eff}} shift beyond that favored by Eqs. (5)–(8). This is the reason why we only introduce the one-flavor thermalized right-handed neutrino\tilde{\nu}_R into the early Universe within our framework. -
The latest updated measurements from the LHCb [5] and SH0ES [55] collaborations have respectively strengthened the deviations of the LFU ratio
R_{K} in rare semi-leptonic B-meson decays and the present-dayH_0 parameter in the Universe. If confirmed with more precise experimental measurements and theoretical predictions, they could be tantalizing hints of NP beyond the SM. In this paper, we construct a simple flavor-specific 2HDM, dubbed thet\nu 2HDM, where significant NP effects arise only from the one-flavor right-handed neutrino and the top quark. Such a framework is only characterized by the three free parameters\kappa_t ,\kappa_\nu , andm_S in the alignment limit with a quasi-degenerate Higgs mass spectrum.The
t\nu 2HDM can explain the long-standingR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies via one eV-scale right-handed Majorana neutrino or one right-handed Dirac neutrino under the most relevant constraints from low-energy flavor physics, the perturbative unitarity condition, and LHC direct searches. However, in contrast with the three-flavor right-handed neutrino scenarios considered in Refs. [13–16], an intriguing prediction resulting from the parameter space for theR_{K^{(*)}} resolution with a one-flavor scenario points toward a moderate shift in the effective neutrino number,\Delta N_{\rm eff}=N_{\rm eff}-N_{\rm eff}^{\rm SM} , at the early BBN and late CMB epochs. It is then found that while the\Delta N_{\rm eff} shift predicted in the Dirac neutrino case is still at\Delta N_{\rm eff}\simeq 1.0 and hence disfavored by the CMB polarization measurements, the shift induced in the Majorana case is\Delta N_{\rm eff}\simeq 0.5 , which coincides with the ranges from Eqs. (5)–(8) favored to ease the notoriousH_0 tension [63–67]. There is also a potential correlation betweenR_{K^{(\ast)}} anomalies and theH_0 tension achieved via the\Delta N_{\rm eff} shift with the one-flavor eV-scale right-handed Majorana neutrino, and such a correlation can be tested in the future.In conclusion, the
t\nu 2HDM provides an interesting link betweenR_{K^{(*)}} anomalies andH_0 tension. In addition, a light right-handed Majorana neutrino embedded in the 2HDM infers a hierarchical Majorana neutrino pattern for the seesaw generation of the neutrino masses and, in particular, a nearly massless active neutrino.As a final comment, we discuss direct searches of right-handed neutrinos. These right-handed neutrinos, which are also called heavy neutral leptons with masses above the eV scale, are often proposed to explain several puzzles of fundamental physics, a foremost example being neutrino oscillations. These hypothetical particles can be of Majorana or Dirac nature. The present generation of experiments usually focuses on the following three aspects: neutrino masses, oscillation parameters, and neutrinoless double beta decay [128, 129]. Future precise measurements of these parameters may come from many types of experiments, such as short-baseline, fixed-target, and collider experiments. With the upcoming precision era of neutrino physics, these terrestrial experiments are expected to determine the exact mixing pattern and flavor structures of heavy neutral leptons [128]. In addition, specific to the
t\nu 2HDM, new interactions in the lepton sector can lead to the charged-Higgs decaying into right-handed neutrinos,H^+\to\mu^+\nu . These right-handed neutrinos can therefore be searched for at the LHC in terms of SM-like Yukawa interactions with extended neutrinos. However, such processes have not yet been observed at the LHC, and only some phenomenological studies exist in literature [125]. We expect that right-handed neutrinos will be detected via the channelH^+\to\mu^+\nu in future experiments, and the free parameters related to heavy neutral leptons will be determined by forthcoming neutrino experiments. -
We thank Biao-Feng Hou for providing us with the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO calculation and helpful discussions.
Linking RK(∗) anomalies to Hubble tension via a single right-handed neutrino
- Received Date: 2022-10-08
- Available Online: 2023-03-15
Abstract: Updated measurements from the LHCb and SH0ES collaborations have respectively strengthened the deviations of the ratio