Erratum and Addendum: Analytical formula for the cross section of hadron production from e+e− collisions around the narrow charmouinum resonances (Chin. Phys. C, 48(11): 113104 (2024))

Yanan Wang; Yadi Wang; Ping Wang

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/adb709

Chinese Physics C> 2025, Vol. 49> Issue(3) : 039001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/adb709

Erratum and Addendum: Analytical formula for the cross section of hadron production from e⁺e⁻ collisions around the narrow charmouinum resonances (Chin. Phys. C, 48(11): 113104 (2024))

1.
North China Electric Power Unversity, Beijing 102206, China
2.
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

[1]	Huixiao Duan , Fan Zhang , Kailei Wang , Jun Su . Nuclear temperature of spectator source extracted by neutron spectra in ¹²⁴Sn,¹⁰⁷Sn + ¹²⁰Sn collisions at 600 MeV/nucleon. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10.
[2]	Xin Zhang , Yu Zhang , Xiaofeng Luo , Nu Xu . UrQMD Simulations of Higher-order Cumulants in Au+Au Collisions at High Baryon Density. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-6. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae0995
[3]	Jialin He , Xinye Peng , Zhongbao Yin , Liang Zheng . Extracting the kinetic freeze-out properties of high energy pp collisions at the LHC with event shape classifiers. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-16.
[4]	. ³H and ³He nuclei production in a combined thermal and coalescence framework for heavy-ion collisions in the few-GeV energy regime. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(1): 014104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae099a
[5]	G.R. Boroun . Non-linear corrections to the derivative of nuclear reduced cross-section at small x at a future electron-ion collider. Chinese Physics C, 2026, 50(2): 1-10.
[6]	Siyu Tang , Zuman Zhang , Chao Zhang , Liang Zheng , Renzhuo Wan . Investigating the transverse-momentum- and pseudorapidity-dependent flow vector decorrelation in p–Pb collisions with a multi-phase transport model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adef1b
[7]	Zhi-Lei Ma , Zhun Lu , Hao Liu , Li Zhang . Inelastic heavy quarkonium photoproduction in p-p and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 103103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade1ca
[8]	Shuo Yang , Yi-Hang Wang , Peng-Bo Zhao , Ji-Long Ma . Search for heavy vector-like B quark via pair production in fully hadronic channels at CLIC. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 113101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf183
[9]	Yiming Gao , Yoshiki K. Tanaka , Vasyl Drozd , Hiroyuki Ekawa , Samuel Escrig , Yan He , Ayumi Kasagi , Enqiang Liu , Manami Nakagawa , Christophe Rappold , Takehiko R. Saito , Ryohei Sekiya , He Wang , Ayari Yanai , Xiaohong Zhou . Feasibility study of measuring interaction cross sections of hypernuclei produced in projectile fragmentation reactions with WASA-FRS setup. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf4b2
[10]	Hanmei Cao , Fanglei Zou , Xiaojun Sun , Jingshang Zhang . Effects of energy levels on the double-differential cross sections of outgoing charged particles for the n+¹⁹F reaction below 20 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124107. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adf49f
[11]	Qing Wu , Wei-Feng Li , Zhong-Ming Niu , Hao-Zhao Liang , Min Shi . Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 114103. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade954
[12]	Muhammad Farhan Taseer , Subhash Singha . Impact of particle production mechanisms on pseudorapidity distribution and directed flow in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at ${ \sqrt{{\boldsymbol s}_{\boldsymbol{ NN}}}}$ = 19.6 GeV using AMPT model. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(10): 104101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ade660
[13]	Yu-Bin Zhang , Li-Ye Xiao , Xian-Hui Zhong . Possible explanations of the observed Λ_c resonances. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(11): 112001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/aded00
[14]	Wei-Xi Kong , Ben-Wei Zhang . Fox-Wolfram moment of jet production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(9): 094101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/add5d8
[15]	Ning Wang . Refinement of an analytical capture cross section formula. Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49(12): 124106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adfe53
[16]	ZHANG Zhou-Li , HE Yuan , ZHANG Bin , LI De-Run , SHI Ai-Min , PAN Gang , DU Xiao-Nan , SUN Lie-Peng . Study of influence of radial matcher section end shape on RFQ cavity frequency. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(7): 077007. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/7/077007
[17]	WU Zhong-Li . ANALYSIS OF THE MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTION WIDTH OF THE PREOJECTILE-LIKE-FRAGMENT FROM HEAVY ION COLLISIONS. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(8): 752-754.

Access

Figures(1)

Get Citation

Yanan Wang, Yadi Wang and Ping Wang. Erratum and Addendum: Analytical formula for the cross section of hadron 2 production from e⁺e⁻ collisions around the narrow charmouinum resonances (Chin. Phys. C, 48(11): 113104 (2024))[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/adb709

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2025-02-17

Article Metric

Article Views(1069)
PDF Downloads(15)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Erratum and Addendum: Analytical formula for the cross section of hadron production from e⁺e⁻ collisions around the narrow charmouinum resonances (Chin. Phys. C, 48(11): 113104 (2024))

1. North China Electric Power Unversity, Beijing 102206, China
2. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received Date: 2025-02-17
Available Online: 2025-03-15

Abstract:

HTML

This paper was published online on 8 August 2024 with a typo sign in Eq. (3), plots in Fig. 5 being mistaken, and the acknowledgement of an author being missed. The function $F(x, s)$ in Eq. (3) in the published version of the journal should be corrected as:

$ \begin{aligned}[b] F(x, s)=\;&t x^{t-1}(1+\delta)-t(1-\frac{x}{2}) \\ + &\frac{t^2}{8}\left[4(2-x)\ln\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1+3(1-x)^2}{x}\ln(1-x) -6+x\right]. \end{aligned} $

(1)

The parameters have the same meaning with those in the published version. The other formulas or conclusions remain unaffected. The plots for the comparison with $n=2$ for a bayron pair in Fig. 5 in publied version are corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

Figure 1. (color online) Difference between DTFI and AAF with $n=2$ in different assumptions of $\mathcal{C}$, $\mathcal{F}$ and $\Phi$. The color in each box stands for the largest differnce between $3.67$ GeV to $3.70$ GeV.