Erratum and Addendum: Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect (Chin. Phys. C, 49(11): 114103 (2025))

Figures(1)

Get Citation
Qing Wu, Wei-Feng Li, Zhong-Ming Niu, Hao-Zhao Liang and Min Shi. Erratum and Addendum: Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect (Chin. Phys. C, 49(11): 114103 (2025))[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae23a6
Qing Wu, Wei-Feng Li, Zhong-Ming Niu, Hao-Zhao Liang and Min Shi. Erratum and Addendum: Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect (Chin. Phys. C, 49(11): 114103 (2025))[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ae23a6 shu
Milestone
Received: 2025-05-15
Article Metric

Article Views(54)
PDF Downloads(1)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Erratum and Addendum: Improvement of nuclear semi-empirical mass formula by including shell effect (Chin. Phys. C, 49(11): 114103 (2025))

  • 1. School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
  • 2. Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • 3. Quark Nuclear Science Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • 4. School of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China

Abstract: 

    HTML

  • This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

    Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.

  • This paper was published online on 28 June 2025, and there is a numerical error in Fig. 1 of the published version. This correction only resulted in minor changes to the last decimal places of the root mean square (rms) deviation of the BWK formula, and through rigorous verification, such discrepancies will not have any impact on the key conclusions of the paper. The Fig. 1 in the published version is corrected as Fig. 1 in this erratum.

    Figure 1.  Differences between the experimental binding energies and predictions calculated using the BWK* and BWK formulas, respectively. The dashed lines denote the traditional magic numbers.

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return