Critical Temperature of Lequid-gas Phase Transition for Hot Nuclear Matter and Three-body Force Effect

  • The finite temperature Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (FTBHF) approach is extended by introducing a microscopic three-body force. Within the extended approach, the three-body force effects on the equation of state of hot nuclear matter and its temperature dependence have been investigated. The critical properties of the liquid-gas phase transition of hot nuclear matter have been calculated. It is shown that the three-body force provides a repulsive contribution to the equation of state of hot nuclear matter. The repulsive effect of the three-body force becomes more pronounced as the density and temperature increase and consequently inclusion of the three-body force contribution in the calculation reduces the predicted critical temperature from about 16MeV to about 13MeV. By separating the contribution originated from the 2σ-exchange process coupled to the virtual excitation of a nucleon-antinucleon pair from the full three-body force, the connection between the three-body force effect and the relativistic correction from the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock has been explored. It turns out that the contribution of the 2σ-NN part is more repulsive than that of the full three-body force and the calculated critical temperature is about 11MeV if only the 2σ-NN component of the three-body force is included which is lower than the value obtained in the case of including the full three-body force and is close to the value predicted by the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (DBHF) approach. Our result provides a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between the values of critical temperature predicted from the FTBHF approach including the three-body force and the DBHF approach.
  • 加载中
  • [1] . Friedman B, Pandharipande V R. Nucl. Phys., 1981, A361:5022. Bertsch G, Siemens P J. Phys. Lett., 1983, B126: 93. Pethick C J, Ravenhall D G. Nucl. Phys., 1987, A471: 194. Satpathy L, Mishra M, Nayak R. Phys. Rev., 1989, C39:1625. Baldo M, Giansiracuso G, Lombardo U et al. Nucl. Phys.,1995, A583: 589c6. Bonche P, Levit S, Vautherin D. Nucl. Phys., 1984, A427:278; 1985, A436: 2567. Pochodzalla J, Mohlenkemp T, Rubehn T et al. Phys. Rev.Lett., 1995, 75: 10408. Natowitz J B, Wada R, Hagel K et al. Phys. Rev., 2002,C65: 034618; Lopez O. Nucl. Phys., 2001, A685: 2469. Gupta S D, Mekjian A Z, Tsang M B. Adv. Nucl. Phys.,2001, 26: 9110. Prakash M, Bombaci I, Prakash M et al. Phys. Rep., 1997,280: 111. Strobel K, Sohaab C, Weigel M K. Astron. Astrophys.,1999, 350: 49712. Jaqaman H R, Mekjian A Z, Zamick L. Phys. Rev., 1983,C27: 2782; 1984, C29: 206713. Lattimer J M, Pethick C J, Ravenhall D G et al. Nucl.Phys., 1985, A432: 64614. SU R K, YANG S D, Kuo T T S. Phys. Rev., 1987, C35:1539; SONG H Q, SU R K. Phys. Rev., 1991, C44: 250515. Catalano D, Giansiracusa G, Lombardo U. Nucl. Phys.,2001, A681: 39016. Glendenning N K. Nucl. Phys., 1987, A469: 60017. M#252;ller H, Serot B D. Phys. Rev., 1995, C52: 207218. Haar B ter, Malfliet R. Phys. Rep., 1987, 149: 20719. Huber H, Weber F, Weigel M K. Phys. Rev., 1998, C57:348420. ZUO W, Lejeune A, Lombardo U et al. Nucl. Phys., 2002,A706: 418; ZUO W, Lombardo U. High Energy Phys. andNucl. Phys., 2002, 26: 1134(in Chinese)(左维,Lombardo U.高能物理与核物理,2002, 26: 1134)21. Brockmann R, Malfliet R. Phys. Rev., 1990, C42: 196522. Fuchs C. Lect. Notes Phys., 2004, 641: 11923. Grang#233; P, Lejeune A, Martzolff M et al. Phys. Rev., 1989,C40: 104024. Lejeune A, Grang′e P, Martzolff M et al. Nucl. Phys., 1986,A453: 18925. Baldo M. Nuclear Methods and the Nuclear Equation ofState. Ed Baldo M. Singapore: World Scientific, 1999. 126. Bombaci I, Kuo T T S, Lombardo U. Phys. Rep., 1994,242: 16527. Wiringa R B, Stoks V G J, Schiavilla R. Phys. Rev., 1995,C51: 2828. Jeukenne J P, Lejeune A, Mahaux C. Phys. Rep., 1976,C25: 8329. SONG H Q, Baldo M, Giansiracusa G et al. Phys. Rev.Lett., 1998, 81: 158430. Baldo M, Bombaci I, Ferreira L S et al. Phys. Rev., 1991,C43: 260531. Baldo M, Bombaci I, Burgio G F. Astron. Astrophys., 1997,328: 27432. ZUO W, Bombaci I, Lombardo U. Phys. Rev., 1999, C60:02460533. Brown G E, Weise W, Baym G et al. Comments Nucl.Phys., 1987, 17: 39
  • 加载中

Get Citation
ZUO Wei, LU Guang-Cheng, LI Zeng-Hua and LUO Pei-Yan. Critical Temperature of Lequid-gas Phase Transition for Hot Nuclear Matter and Three-body Force Effect[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2005, 29(11): 1061-1066.
ZUO Wei, LU Guang-Cheng, LI Zeng-Hua and LUO Pei-Yan. Critical Temperature of Lequid-gas Phase Transition for Hot Nuclear Matter and Three-body Force Effect[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2005, 29(11): 1061-1066. shu
Milestone
Received: 2005-02-22
Revised: 1900-01-01
Article Metric

Article Views(3628)
PDF Downloads(650)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Critical Temperature of Lequid-gas Phase Transition for Hot Nuclear Matter and Three-body Force Effect

    Corresponding author: ZUO Wei,
  • Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract: The finite temperature Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (FTBHF) approach is extended by introducing a microscopic three-body force. Within the extended approach, the three-body force effects on the equation of state of hot nuclear matter and its temperature dependence have been investigated. The critical properties of the liquid-gas phase transition of hot nuclear matter have been calculated. It is shown that the three-body force provides a repulsive contribution to the equation of state of hot nuclear matter. The repulsive effect of the three-body force becomes more pronounced as the density and temperature increase and consequently inclusion of the three-body force contribution in the calculation reduces the predicted critical temperature from about 16MeV to about 13MeV. By separating the contribution originated from the 2σ-exchange process coupled to the virtual excitation of a nucleon-antinucleon pair from the full three-body force, the connection between the three-body force effect and the relativistic correction from the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock has been explored. It turns out that the contribution of the 2σ-NN part is more repulsive than that of the full three-body force and the calculated critical temperature is about 11MeV if only the 2σ-NN component of the three-body force is included which is lower than the value obtained in the case of including the full three-body force and is close to the value predicted by the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (DBHF) approach. Our result provides a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between the values of critical temperature predicted from the FTBHF approach including the three-body force and the DBHF approach.

    HTML

Reference (1)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return